Skip to main content
Dryad

Rethinking thecodonty: The influence of two centuries of comparative dental anatomy on our understanding of tooth evolution

Mestriner, Gabriel123; Funston, Gregory453; Marsola, Júlio6; Nesbitt, Sterling7; Langer, Max1; Evans, David23; LeBlanc, Aaron8

Published Sep 17, 2025 on Dryad. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.9cnp5hqxs

Data files

Sep 17, 2025 version files 13.95 MB

Click names to download individual files

Abstract

"Thecodont" refers to teeth implanted in sockets within the jaw, a condition traditionally associated with living mammals and crocodylians, which also coincidentally have teeth attached by ligaments to the socket walls (gomphosis). For over a century, the bony periodontium of many other amniotes has been described as a single tissue, "bone of attachment”, causing confusion over dental tissue homology. Conventional definitions of “thecodonty” exclude species with fused teeth (“ankylothecodonts”), implying a fundamental difference between mammals, crocodylians, and most other vertebrates. However, the stereotypically “thecodont” attachment tissues have been discovered in all major amniote clades, showing that gomphosis and ankylosis likely stem from heterochronic changes in the timing and extent of cementum and alveolar bone mineralization. This challenges (1) previous hypotheses regarding the evolution of the amniote periodontium, (2) the “bone of attachment” paradigm, and (3) the significance of “thecodonty”. We suggest a new nomenclatural approach that incorporates recent histological and evolutionary research and divides thecodonty into anatomical categories to clarify their origin and evolution. We propose the terms anisothecodont and isothecodont to denote, respectively, asymmetric and symmetric implantation of teeth in their sockets. Regardless of the geometry of the connection, we propose using ankylosis and gomphosis to denote the mode of tooth attachment.