Skip to main content
Dryad

Data for: Giant longirostrine crocodylians from the Early Miocene of Pakistan: new material and taxonomical review

Data files

May 14, 2025 version files 49.73 KB
May 14, 2025 version files 49.74 KB

Click names to download individual files

Abstract

This study, based on previously undescribed crocodile remains from the Early Miocene of the Bugti Hills (Balochistan, Pakistan), reveals the existence of at least three distinct species. It confirms the validity of the species initially identified as "Gavialis" pachyrhynchus, establishing it as the sister taxon to the massive Miocene crocodile Rhamphosuchus crassidens. Consequently, it is reclassified as Rhamphosuchus pachyrhynchus. Additionally, "Gharialis" curvirostris is now acknowledged as a valid species under the new genus name Pseudogavialis, closely related to Gavialis. Another set of remains represents a third species, although the poor preservation hinders precise identification. The phylogenetic relationships between Tomistoma and Gavialis are one of the most debated issues in crocodylian phylogeny. Molecular analyses suggest a sister-taxa relationship dating back to the Early Miocene, while morphological analyses place Gavialis at the base of the tree, diverging from thoracosaurs, with a Gavialoidea/Crocodyloidea split in the Cretaceous. The inclusion of newly described species in phylogenetic analyses yields variable outcomes, highlighting the sensitivity of results to the species considered. The insertion of Portugalosuchus azenhae, found as a thoracosaurine, aligns with traditional morphological findings, while the inclusion of Indo-Pakistani species of Rhamphosuchus supports the molecular hypothesis. Nevertheless, when the molecular result is found, a large number of morphologic gavialoids and thoracosaurines make the result strongly stratigraphically incongruent. The inclusion of fossil species in the phylogenetic analyses significantly impacts the understanding of crocodylian relationships. Even when molecular results align with morphological data, the persistent stratigraphic incongruence does not resolve the Gavialis-Tomistoma dilemma.