Ecological specialization, clonal diversity and local adaptation explain the co-existence of sexual and asexual grass thrips
Data files
Jun 10, 2025 version files 145.75 KB
-
Ecological_specialisation.csv
14.02 KB
-
FS_plantcouv_publiJEB2025_FINAL-sub.csv
5.12 KB
-
Local_adaptation.csv
46.61 KB
-
MatK_JEB2025.fasta
73.50 KB
-
R_scripts_Ghali-etal2025JEB.R
4.56 KB
-
README.md
1.96 KB
Abstract
The maintenance of sex is difficult to explain in the face of the demographic advantages of asexuality, especially when sexual and asexual lineages co-occur and compete. Here, we test if niche divergence and host plant specialization can contribute to the maintenance of sympatric populations of two closely related, sexual and asexual Aptinothrips grass thrips species. In mesocosm experiments, ecological niche and host plant specialization were inferred from thrips performance on different grass species used as hosts in natural populations. Sexual and asexual thrips performed best on different grass species, indicating niche differentiation. The asexual species was also characterized by a broader ecological niche than the sexual one. However, niche differentiation is unlikely to explain the maintenance of the two species in sympatry, because the reproductive rate of asexual females generally exceeded that of sexual ones. Surprisingly, the asexual but not sexual species showed geographic variation in the ecological niche. This geographic variation likely stems from variation in clonal assemblages among locations because different asexual genotypes have different ecological niches. Across natural populations, the performance of asexual females on a specific grass species was furthermore positively correlated with the abundance of that grass species, consistent with adaptation to locally abundant grasses. Altogether, our results suggest that niche differentiation contributes little to the co-occurrence of sexual and asexual grass thrips and that asexuality facilitates adaptation to a diversity of co-occurring host plants.
Dataset DOI: 10.5061/dryad.2547d7x3k
Description of the data and file structure
Thrips offspring counts and information on clones are provided in the excel files. The R file contains the scripts to analyse this data.
### Files and variables
File: Local_adaptation.csv
**Description: offspring number per clonal lineage per species per host plant
Variables
- site:location
- Plant:plant species
- Rep:replicate number (per lineage, per plant)
- Offspring:offspring count
- Date:day sampled during fieldwork season
- long:longitude
- lat:latitude
- alt:altitude
- Festuca_rubra:coverage F. rubra
- Poa_trivilais:coverage P. trivialis
File: Ecological_specialisation.csv
Description:
Variables
- site:Location
- plant: plant species
- sp: thrips species
- rep: replicate
- fit: offspring number
- batch: batch
File: R_scripts.docx
Description: R scripts to run analyses
Code/software
R
File: MatK_JEB2025.fasta
**Description: sequencing data to identify the plant species. In standard Fasta format.
File: FS_plantcouv_publiJEB2025_FINAL-sub.csv
**Description: data for figure 3 (plant coverage)
Variables
- PLANT_ID: Unique identifier for each morphotype observed within a 1x1 m plot.
- SITE: Identifier of each individual sampling plot.
- LOC: Name or code of the locality in which the plots are situated.
- SP: Grass species assigned to each morphotype based on matK DNA sequencing.
- COUV: Number of 10x10 cm squares (out of 100) within the 1x1 m plot that are covered by the morphotype. This provides an estimate of absolute coverage.
- COUV/3: coverage of each morphotype per locality, calculated by averaging COUV values across the three plots within each locality (i.e., COUV divided by 3).
