Lipidomic dataset of MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells treated with diacylglycerol acyltransferase (DGAT) inhibitors and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)
Data files
Feb 19, 2026 version files 331.56 KB
-
MDA231_DGATi_lipidomics_data_FINAL.csv
325.89 KB
-
README.md
5.66 KB
Abstract
Lipid droplets (LDs) are dynamic fat storage organelles involved in fatty acid metabolism. By storing polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) in the form of neutral lipids, LDs can either mitigate or exacerbate lipotoxic damage. However, their role in regulating cellular fatty acid distribution, membrane unsaturation, and ferroptosis susceptibility remains poorly understood. To explore how LD turnover modulates membrane lipid composition and ferroptosis sensitivity in cancer cells exposed to exogenous PUFAs, MDA-MB-231 human triple-negative breast cancer cells were supplemented with non-lethal concentrations of exogenous docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and treated with inhibitors of diacylglycerol acyltransferases (DGAT) 1 and 2. Untargeted lipidomic analysis revealed substantial lipidome remodeling with 302 significantly altered lipids in response to DGAT inhibition, DHA supplementation, or combined treatment.
Dataset DOI: 10.5061/dryad.2bvq83c4h
Description of the data and file structure
Human MDA-MB-231 cancer cells were treated with a mixture of DGAT1 and DGAT2 inhibitors, supplemented with exogenous DHA, harvested at three time points, and analyzed by LC/MS using the LIMex platform. Untargeted lipidomic analysis revealed substantial lipidome remodeling with 302 significantly altered lipids in response to DGAT inhibition, DHA supplementation, or combined treatment.
Files and variables
File: MDA231_DGATi_lipidomics_data_FINAL.csv
Description: The file shows lipidomic data from MDA-MB-231 cells treated with DGAT inhibitors, 20 μM T863 for DGAT1 and 20 μM PF-06424439 for DGAT2, and 25 μM DHA. Total cell lysates were collected at 1, 4, and 24 h following treatment.
Variables
- Sample numbers: 2_1, 3_1, ....
- Conditions: control (untreated cells), DGATi (DGAT inhibitors- treated cells), DHA (DHA-treated cells), DGATi+DHA (DGATi and DHA-treated cells).
- 0 h (before treatment), 1 h (1 h following treatment), 4 h (4 h following treatment), 24 h (24 h following treatment)
- Metabolite name (full)
- Lipid Class: Lipid class nomenclature
| Abbreviation | Lipid class | Example: chain summed | Example: chain separated |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acylcarnitine | CAR | CAR 18:1 | CAR 18:1 |
| Cholesteryl ester | CE | CE 18:1 | CE 18:1 |
| Cardiolipin | CL | CL 70:5 | CL 16:0_18:1_18:2_18:2 |
| Ceramide non-hydroxyfatty acid-dihydrosphingosine | Cer-NDS | Cer 44:0;2O | Cer 18:0;2O/26:0 |
| Ceramide non-hydroxyfatty acid-sphingosine | Cer-NS | Cer 42:1;2O | Cer 18:1;2O/24:0 |
| Cholesterol | Cholesterol | Cholesterol | Cholesterol |
| Coenzyme Q | CoQ | CoQ10 | CoQ10 |
| Diacylglycerol | DG | DG 38:4 | DG 18:0_20:4 |
| Free fatty acid | FA | FA 18:1 | FA 18:1 |
| Ganglioside GM3 | GM3 | GM3 36:1;2O | GM3 18:1;2O/18:0 |
| Dihexosylceramide | Hex2Cer | Hex2Cer 34:1;2O | Hex2Cer 18:1;2O/16:0 |
| Trihexosylceramide | Hex3Cer | Hex3Cer 34:1;2O | Hex3Cer 18:1;2O/16:0 |
| Hexosylceramide non-hydroxyfatty acid-dihydrosphingosine | HexCer-NDS | HexCer 40:0;2O | HexCer 18:0;2O/22:0 |
| Hexosylceramide non-hydroxyfatty acid-sphingosine | HexCer-NS | HexCer 38:1;2O | HexCer 18:1;2O/20:0 |
| Lysophophatidylcholine | LPC | LPC 18:1 | LPC 18:1 |
| Lysophosphatidylethanolamine | LPE | LPE 18:1 | LPE 18:1 |
| Monogalactosyldiacylglycerol | MGDG | MGDG 34:1 | MGDG 16:0_18:1 |
| N-acyl ethanolamines | NAE | NAE 20:4 | NAE 20:4 |
| Phosphatidylcholine | PC | PC 38:4 | PC 18:0_20:4 |
| Ether-linked phosphatidylcholine | EtherPC | PC O-38:4 | PC O-18:0_20:4 |
| Phosphatidylethanolamine | PE | PE 38:4 | PE 18:0_20:4 |
| Ether-linked phosphatidylethanolamine | EtherPE | PE O-38:4 | PE O-18:0_20:4 |
| Oxidized phosphatidylethanolamine | OxPE | PE 38:4;4O | PE 18:0_20:4;4O |
| Phosphatidylglycerol | PG | PG 38:4 | PG 18:0_20:4 |
| Phosphatidylinositol | PI | PI 38:4 | PI 18:0_20:4 |
| Ether-linked phosphatidylinositol | EtherPI | PI O-36:4 | PI O-16:0_20:4 |
| Phosphatidylserine | PS | PS 38:4 | PS 18:0_20:4 |
| Sphingomyelin | SM | SM 38:1;2O | SM 18:1;2O/20:0 |
| Sterol sulfate | SSulfate | ST 27:1;O;S | ST 27:1;O;S |
| Triacylglycerol | TG | TG 56:8 | TG 16:0_18:2_22:6 |
| Ether-linked triacylglycerol | EtherTG | TG O-56:7 | TG O-16:0_18:1_22:6 |
Units of measurement: AU/μg total protein
Sample Type:
Total cell lysates of MDA-MB-231 cells.
Cell Culture and Sample Preparation:
MDA-MB-231 cells were seeded in 6-well plates at 3 × 10^5 cells/well and left to attach for 24 h. After 24 h, the cells were treated with DGAT inhibitors and 25 μM DHA in RPMI-1640 media supplemented with 10% FBS. After 1, 4, and 24 h, cell lysates were collected. Total protein content was determined in each sample using the Pierce 660 nm Protein Assay Kit following the manufacturer’s instructions and used to normalize lipid signals.
Lipid Extraction for Mass Spectrometry:
Lipids were extracted using the LIMeX LC–MS workflow, including biphasic solvent system consisting of cold methanol, methyl tert-butyl ether, and 10% methanol. An aliquot of the upper organic phase was collected, evaporated, and resuspended in methanol containing the internal standard [12-[(cyclohexylamino)carbonyl]amino]-dodecanoic acid (CUDA).
LC-MS Data Acquisition and Lipid Annotation:
For untargeted lipidomics, the LC–MS systems consisted of a Vanquish UHPLC System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany) coupled to a Q Exactive Plus mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany). We separated the lipids on an ACQUITY Premier BEH C18 column (50 × 2.1 mm; 1.7 μm) with VanGuard FIT (5 × 2.1 mm; 1.7 μm) and detected them using positive and negative electrospray ionization (ESI). Raw data were processed using MS-DIAL 4.94 with an in-house retention time–m/z library and MS/MS libraries from public and commercial sources (MassBank, MoNA, NIST23). Metabolites were annotated according to the LIPID MAPS classification system and the shorthand notation for lipid structures. All analytes in MS-DIAL were manually curated.
Data Processing and Quality Control:
Data were filtered using blank samples, serial dilution samples, and quality control (QC) pool samples with a relative standard deviation (RSD) < 30%. Normalization was performed using the LOESS approach, based on QC pool samples injected regularly between every 10 actual samples. Samples were randomized across the platform run. Signal intensities were normalized to protein content (arb. units/µg protein). Outliers within biological triplicates were identified by calculating the coefficient of variation (CV); values with a CV greater than 30% were considered outliers and removed. Missing values were imputed by averaging the remaining two biological replicates. Lipids in individual samples that still exhibited a CV greater than 30% after this step were excluded from further analysis. Data are reported as signal intensities normalized to total protein levels [arb. units/μg protein].
