Data from: Sexually selected weapons can wear out, decreasing their effectiveness in combat
Data files
Jun 13, 2024 version files 68.62 KB
-
Data.S1.xlsx
16.64 KB
-
Data.S2.xlsx
14.59 KB
-
Data.S3.xlsx
30.69 KB
-
README.md
6.70 KB
Abstract
Sexual selection has resulted in some of the most elaborate traits seen in animals, many of which are used as weapons. These weapons can be incredibly diverse, even within species. Such morphological variation has largely been attributed to the environment in which individuals are reared and their genetics. However, variation in weapon form could also be the result of a weapon wearing out from usage. This mechanism has received relatively little attention. In this study, we demonstrate that sexually selected weapons can wear out from repeated use, providing experimental evidence that weapon usage can contribute to the diversity of weapon shapes observed within species. In a second experiment, we demonstrate that having a worn-out weapon decreases an individual’s fighting ability. This finding illustrates that the shape of a weapon can have an important role in determining contest outcomes. Overall, these results suggest that individuals are limited in the number of times they can effectively use their weapons, which may be one factor (amongst others) influencing how frequently an animal engages in a fight.
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.37pvmcvtn
There are three datasets (Data.S1.xlsx, Data.S2.xlsx, and Data.S3.xlsx) and one R code (R.code.R) file associate with this manuscript.
Description of the data and file structure
Data.S1
| ID | Identification number |
|---|---|
| PW | Pronotal width in mm |
| Season | whether the individual was collected early in a season (June/July) or late in a season (August) |
| Radius.1 | first measurement for radius of the curvature of the tibial spine tip in mm |
| Radius.2 | second measurement for radius of the curvature of the tibial spine tip in mm |
| Radius.3 | third measurement for radius of the curvature of the tibial spine tip in mm |
| Radius | average radius of the curvature of the tibial spine tip in mm |
| Wing.punctures | whether the forewings have fighting-related punctures on their wings (1=Yes, 0=No) |
Data.S2
| ID | Identification number |
|---|---|
| PW | Pronotal width in mm |
| Strikes | number of simulated strikes |
| Radius.1 | first measurement for radius of the curvature of the tibial spine tip in mm |
| Radius.2 | second measurement for radius of the curvature of the tibial spine tip in mm |
| Radius.3 | third measurement for radius of the curvature of the tibial spine tip in mm |
| Radius | average radius of the curvature of the tibial spine tip in mm |
Data.S3
| Focal.ID | Identification number for focal male |
|---|---|
| Focal.mass | Mass of focal male in grams |
| Focal.FW | Femur width of the focal males right hind leg in mm |
| Focal.Radius.1 | first measurement for radius of the curvature of the focal tibial spine tip in mm |
| Focal.Radius.2 | second measurement for radius of the curvature of the focal tibial spine tip in mm |
| Focal.Radius.3 | third measurement for radius of the curvature of the focal tibial spine tip in mm |
| Focal.Radius | average radius of the curvature of the focal tibial spine tip in mm |
| Treatment | Treatment that the focal male was randomly assigned |
| Rival.ID | Identification number for rival male |
| Rival.mass | Mass of rival male in grams |
| Rival.FW | Femur width of the rival males right hind leg in mm |
| Rival.Radius.1 | first measurement for radius of the curvature of the rival tibial spine tip in mm |
| Rival.Radius.2 | second measurement for radius of the curvature of the rival tibial spine tip in mm |
| Rival.Radius.3 | third measurement for radius of the curvature of the rival tibial spine tip in mm |
| Rival.Radius | average radius of the curvature of the rival tibial spine tip in mm |
| Relative.difference.mass | Relative difference in mass between focal and rival male |
| Size.similarity.mass | Absolute values of the relative difference in mass between focal and rival male |
| Relative.difference.FW | Relative difference in femur width between focal and rival male |
| Size.similarity.FW | Absolute values of the relative difference in femur width between focal and rival male |
| Relative.difference.radius | Relative difference in the radius of the curvature of the tibial spine between focal and rival male |
| Size.similarity.radius | Absolute values of the relative difference in the radius of the curvature of the tibial spine between focal and rival male |
| Interaction.binary | Whether or not there were any fighting interactions (1=Yes, 0=No) |
| Rival.Interactions | Total number of fighting interactions the rival engaged in |
| Focal.Interactions | Total number of fighting interactions the focal engaged in |
| Focal.Win | Whether the focal male was dominant (1=Yes, 0=No). Empty cell indicates there was no clear winner. |
| Clear.Focal.Strike | Whether the focal male clearly used their tibial spine to strike its rival (1=Yes, 0=No) |
| Time | Time, in hours, that the behavioral trial started |
| Temperature | Air temperature in C at the start of the behavioral trial |
- McEvoy, Isaac; Daniels, Lana; Emberts, Zachary (2024). Sexually selected weapons can wear out, decreasing their effectiveness in combat. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2024.1090
- McEvoy, Isaac; Daniels, Lana; Emberts, Zachary (2024). Data from: Sexually selected weapons can wear out, decreasing their effectiveness in combat. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11528424
