Skip to main content
Dryad

Data from: Reduced palatability, fast flight, and tails: Decoding the defence arsenal of Eudaminae skipper butterflies in a Neotropical locality

Linke, Daniel1; Hernandez Mejia, Jacqueline2; Eche Navarro, Valery N. P.2; Salinas Sánchez, Letty2; de Gusmão Ribeiro, Pedro1; Elias, Marianne3; Matos-Maraví, Pável1

Research facility: Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences
Published Jul 11, 2024; Updated Jul 19, 2024 on Dryad. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.37pvmcvtv

Data files

Jul 11, 2024 version files 322.33 MB
Jul 19, 2024 version files 26.94 GB

Click names to download individual files Select up to 11 GB of files for zip download

Abstract

Prey often rely on multiple defences against predators, such as flight speed, attack deflection from vital body parts, or unpleasant taste, but our understanding on how often and why they are co-exhibited remains limited. Eudaminae skipper butterflies use fast flight and mechanical defences (hindwing tails), but whether they use other defences like unpalatability (consumption deterrence), and how these defences interact, has not been assessed.

We tested the palatability of 12 abundant Eudaminae species in Peru, using training and feeding experiments with domestic chicks. Further, we approximated the difficulty of capture explained by flight speed and quantified by wing loading. We performed phylogenetic regressions to find any association between multiple defences, body size, and habitat preference.

We found a broad range of palatability in Eudaminae, within and among species. Contrary to current understanding, palatability was negatively correlated with wing loading, suggesting that faster butterflies tend to have lower palatability.

The relative length of hind wing tails did not explain the level of butterfly palatability, showing that attack deflection and consumption deterrence are not mutually exclusive. Habitat preference (open or forested environments) did not explain the level of palatability either, although butterflies with high wing loading tended to occupy semi-closed or closed habitats.

Finally, the level of unpalatability in Eudaminae is size dependent. Larger butterflies are less palatable, perhaps because of higher detectability/preference by predators. Altogether, our findings shed light on the contexts favouring the prevalence of single vs. multiple defensive strategies in prey.