Soil physical, biological, chemical, and carbon data and cover crop biomass data from Sac Valley almond orchard comparing multiple cover crop compositions with resident vegetation for effects on soil health and nematodes
Data files
Nov 13, 2025 version files 71.51 KB
-
README.md
8.52 KB
-
WEO_archival_12Nov2025.xlsx
62.99 KB
Abstract
Planted cover crops and naturally occurring resident vegetation in orchards and agricultural fields belong to multiple functional groups which differ in traits, growth dynamics, and ability to influence soil health and biology. These different vegetation mixes may influence soil food webs and ecosystems over a growing season as well as regulating nutrient cycling outcomes. This study characterized soil organisms and nutrients as well as physical and chemical indicators of soil health in an almond orchard with three vegetation mixes: winter resident vegetation (dominated by Vicia, Malva, and Hordeum weedy species), and two cover crops mixes, one functionally diverse (brassica, legume, cereals) and one functionally uniform (brassicas), all of which had been implemented for four years. While physical soil health indicators differed seasonally, only biological indicators differed among the vegetation. During the winter and early spring growth period, both cover crop mixes increased microbial biomass nitrogen compared to resident vegetation, while the uniform mix supported greater numbers of nematodes overall, regardless of trophic group. The diverse cover crop mix supported more complex nematode food webs, as measured by the Structure Footprint, while nematode communities overall were primarily influenced by cover crop biomass and microbial biomass nitrogen. Soil nutrients increased after vegetation termination by flail mowing in all treatments, and the resident vegetation had the largest increase in dissolved organic carbon between the Cover and Post-Cover time points. Nematode indicators of food web composition and function decreased after termination, including the Structure Index, Fungal Footprint and Bacterivore Footprint. In contrast, the relative abundance of herbivores increased over time and, at the Post- Cover time point, both the diverse mix and the uniform mix had a higher proportion of root herbivores than resident vegetation, although these were primarily in the genus Tylenchorhynchus and not considered economically damaging. Increased processing of resources through generalist root herbivore nematodes may have been due to nematodes feeding on the cover crops themselves or on almond roots that foraged into soils with more nutrients. These results suggest that cover cropping can influence soil food webs on multiple fronts including root herbivores and predators. Greater knowledge of how cover crops influence soil health and for how long, during a season, will allow for the more efficient use of cover crops in Mediterranean systems.
Dataset DOI: 10.5061/dryad.4mw6m90qg
Description of the data and file structure
Biomass, soils, and nematode data were collected from 3 treatments (diverse cover crop mix, uniform cover crops mix, and resident vegetation groundcover) in the alleys of an almond orchard to assess the impacts of the cover crop at 2 time points: spring (immediately before cover crop termination) and summer (~3 months after cover crop termination). More details are provided, including management specifics, in the published manuscript.
Files and variables
File: WEO_archival_12Nov2025.xlsx
Description: 5 tabs; 3 data tabs and 2 metadata tabs. Metadata tabs include a list of column names for the associated data tabs with units of each column and definitions of all abbreviations.
NA in all data columns indicated that data are not available for that sample.
Empty cells (in the "subtrt" column) indicates that there was no subtreatment for that trt (because resident vegetation was no planted, there was no early vs late treatment)
Variables
| variable | units |
|---|---|
| biomass | kg ha-1 |
| weeds | kg ha-1 |
| pH | |
| salts | 1:1 S Salts mmho/cm |
| SOM | LOI % |
| P | ppm |
| K | ppm |
| S | ppm |
| Zn | ppm |
| Fe | ppm |
| Mn | ppm |
| Cu | ppm |
| Ca | ppm |
| Mg | ppm |
| Na | ppm |
| CEC | Sum of Cations me 100g-1 |
| H_sat | % Saturation |
| K_sat | % Saturation |
| Ca_sat | % Saturation |
| Mg_sat | % Saturation |
| Na_sat | % Saturation |
| WENO3 | ppm |
| WEOC | ppm |
| WEON | ppm |
| WEOCN | ppm |
| WENH4 | ppm |
| resp | ppm 24 hrs-1 |
| agg_stab | % |
| WETN | ppm |
| SHI | |
| MAC | % |
| N_credit | ppm |
| N_res | ppm |
| BD | g cm3- |
| DOC | mg kg-1 dry soil |
| DON | mg kg-1 dry soil |
| MBC | mg kg-1 dry soil |
| MBN | mg kg-1 dry soil |
| moist_perc | % |
| infil | cm hr-1 |
| Nematode indicates or taxa name | units (if applicable) |
|---|---|
| Maturity Index [MEAN] | |
| Maturity Index 2-5 [MEAN] | |
| Sigma Maturity Index [MEAN] | |
| Plant Parasitic Index [MEAN] | |
| Channel Index [MEAN] | |
| Basal Index [MEAN] | |
| Enrichment Index [MEAN] | |
| Structure Index [MEAN] | |
| Total biomass, mg [MEAN] | |
| Composite footprint [MEAN] | |
| Enrichment footprint [MEAN] | |
| Structure footprint [MEAN] | |
| Herbivore footprint [MEAN] | |
| Fungivore footprint [MEAN] | |
| Bacterivore footprint [MEAN] | |
| Predator footprint [MEAN] | |
| Omnivore footprint [MEAN] | |
| Total number, ind [MEAN] | |
| Herbivores, % of total | |
| Fungivores, % of total | |
| Fungivores, % of free-living | |
| Bacterivores, % of total | |
| Bacterivores, % of free-living | |
| Predators, % of total | |
| Predators, % of free-living | |
| Omnivores, % of total | |
| Omnivores, % of free-living | |
| Sedentary parasites, % of herbivores | |
| Migratory endoparasites, % of herbivores | |
| Semi-endoparasites, % of herbivores | |
| Ectoparasites, % of herbivores | |
| Epidermal/root hair feeders, % of herbivores | |
| Algal/lichen/moss feeders, % of herbivores | |
| CP 1, % of free-living | |
| CP 2, % of free-living | |
| CP 3, % of free-living | |
| CP 4, % of free-living | |
| CP 5, % of free-living | |
| PP 2, % of herbivores | |
| PP 3, % of herbivores | |
| PP 4, % of herbivores | |
| PP 5, % of herbivores | |
| Panagrolaimus | per 200 mL fresh soil |
| Rhabditis | per 200 mL fresh soil |
| Cephalobus | per 200 mL fresh soil |
| Eucephalobus | per 200 mL fresh soil |
| Acrobeles | per 200 mL fresh soil |
| Acrobeloides | per 200 mL fresh soil |
| Plectus | per 200 mL fresh soil |
| Prismatolaimus | per 200 mL fresh soil |
| Xiphinema americanum | per 200 mL fresh soil |
| Heterodera | per 200 mL fresh soil |
| Diphtherophora | per 200 mL fresh soil |
| Discolaimus | per 200 mL fresh soil |
| Hemicycliophora | per 200 mL fresh soil |
| Trichodorus | per 200 mL fresh soil |
| Aphelenchoides | per 200 mL fresh soil |
| Aphelenchus | per 200 mL fresh soil |
| Dorylaimus | per 200 mL fresh soil |
| Qudsianematidae | per 200 mL fresh soil |
| Mononchidae | per 200 mL fresh soil |
| Microdorylaimus | per 200 mL fresh soil |
| Tylenchidae | per 200 mL fresh soil |
| Paratylenchus | per 200 mL fresh soil |
| Tylenchorhynchus | per 200 mL fresh soil |
| Pratylenchus | per 200 mL fresh soil |
| Meloidogyne | per 200 mL fresh soil |
| Tylenchulus | per 200 mL fresh soil |
| Total | per 200 mL fresh soil |
Code/software
Excel file, can open in various software
Access information
Other publicly accessible locations of the data:
- None
Data was derived from the following sources:
- None
