Data from: Mechanical ventilation and indoor air quality in recently constructed homes in cool and humid climates of the U.S.
Data files
Dec 02, 2025 version files 38.50 MB
-
DeltaQ.zip
2.95 KB
-
Home_Characteristics.zip
81.63 KB
-
IAQ_Activity_Monitoring.zip
29.52 MB
-
IAQ_Sample.zip
17.88 KB
-
Infiltration_Airflow.zip
8.16 MB
-
Occupant_Activity.zip
244.52 KB
-
Occupant_Survey.zip
438.63 KB
-
README.md
18.41 KB
-
WHMV_Config.zip
18.68 KB
Abstract
This dataset was collected as part of the Building America Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality (BAVIAQ) field study. The BAVIAQ study aimed to measure indoor air quality (IAQ) parameters, characterize ventilation equipment and other house and household characteristics, and actions that impact IAQ, with a focus on the role of whole-house mechanical ventilation (WHMV). This dataset was obtained from visits and monitoring in 32 single-family homes constructed since 2013 in the cool and humid climate of Illinois. A total of 41 weeks of data were collected. These included one week of data collection in each home under the “as-found” condition of no WHMV, and a second week of data collection in nine homes, during which an exhaust fan was operated to provide WHMV. The dataset includes time-resolved measurements of CO2, PM2.5, formaldehyde, and radon at one or multiple indoor locations, and time-integrated samples of gravimetric PM2.5, NO2, NOx, and formaldehyde collected both indoors and outdoors. Occupants’ activities, including ventilation equipment usage, cooking, window opening, and other usage related to IAQ, were also monitored. Participants also provided household characteristics, practices influencing ventilation and pollutant sources, and self-reported satisfaction with air quality, thermal comfort, and other environmental factors. Building performance metrics were documented, including envelope and duct leakage, mechanical ventilation airflow rates, WHMV system type, controls, operational status, labeling, and compliance with ASHRAE 62.2–2010. The dataset can be used to support research on IAQ impacts of WHMV systems, building performance, occupant behavior, and pollutant exposure in recently constructed, energy-efficient homes. It enables paired-condition comparisons, facilitates evaluation of ventilation standard compliance, and provides a foundation for examining the effectiveness of WHMV in reducing indoor pollutant levels.
Dataset DOI: 10.5061/dryad.4mw6m90qj
Description of the data and file structure
What is in the dataset?
The dataset contains the most relevant information collected about the houses and household, their mechanical equipment, results of the participant survey, results of air leakage and airflow measurements at the homes, pollutant concentrations measured by time-integrated passive samplers inside and outside of the home, usage of cooktop and oven, external door and window open state, and time-series or air pollutants and environmental indicators measured within and outside of the houses.
Files and variables
Infiltration_Airflow
This folder (Infiltration_Airflow.zip) contains time-resolved data of the calculated natural infiltration airflow during the measured week for each test home. The natural infiltration airflow was estimated using the single zone models described in the ASHRAE Fundamentals Handbook assuming no substantial window or door opening. Briefly, the total natural infiltration airflow is the sum of two independent vectors: stack flow(Qs) and wind flow (Qw). The stack flow is calculated using indoor and outdoor temperature difference and stack coefficient and pressure coefficient from air leakage test (DeltaQ); the wind flow is calculated using outdoor wind speed and coefficient from air leakage test. There is one csv file for each measured home. There is also a specific readme file in the folder (Natural Infiltration - README) for more details. Missing data resulting from either an invalid flow measurement or unavailability of outdoor weather data were filled with “NA”.
Column naming and explanations:
- WS Windspeed m/s; NOAA (10 m above ground)
- TOUT Outdoor temperature from NOAA / Fahrenheit
- TIN Indoor temperature from TRH_GRL / Fahrenheit
- T_diff TIN -TOUT / Converted to Celsius before substraction
- T_n T_diff n
- Qs cCsT_n
- GU_m.s G*WS
- Qw cCw(s*U) 2n
- Q sqrt(Qs2+Qw2) in m3
- QCFM_Inf Q in CFM
There is also a coefficient summary file summarize all the coefficient for each house used for the calculation:
Coefficient and explanations:
- G Windspeed multiplier
- c Flow coefficient; DeltaQ
- n Pressure exponent; DeltaQ
- Cs Stack cofficient
- Cw Wind coefficient
- S Shelter factor
DeltaQ
This folder (DeltaQ.zip) contains data about the DeltaQ test results for each home. There is one csv file containing the results for all 32 homes. Three homes (518, 536,544) did not get valid results for both pressurization and depressurization tests, the C values were imputed using n=0.65.
The csv file includes the following columns.
- Average_Baseline_Pa: the average baseline pressure difference between the Ductblaster fan (Pa)
- Pressurization_C, Pressurization_n: the flow constant (c, n) estimated from the pressurization test
- Pressurization_Q50: Air leakage presented in air change per hour at 50 pa difference when pressurizing the house envelope (CFM)
- Depressurization_C, Depressurization_n: the flow constant (c, n) estimated from the depressurization test
- Depressurization_Q50: Air tightness presented in air change per hour at 50 pa difference when depressurizing the house envelope (CFM)
- Supply_DuctLeakage_CFM, Return_DuctLeakage_CFM: initial estimated supply and return duct leakage (CFM)
- Supply_DuctPressure: supply duct pressure during the DeltaQ test (Pa)
- Return_DuctPressure: return duct pressure during the DeltaQ test (Pa)
- Pressurization_ACH50: Air tightness presented in air change per hour at 50 pa difference when pressurizing the house envelope
- Depressurization_ACH50: Air tightness presented in air change per hour at 50 pa difference when depressurizing the house envelope
- ACH50: Averaged envelope air tightness presented in air change per hour at 50 pa difference by considering both pressurization and depressurization
- Total_DuctLeakage: total duct leakage by summing up both supply and return duct leakage (CFM)
- Review note: researcher review note for each DeltaQ test
Home_characteristics
This folder (Home_Characteristics.zip) contains data about the house, including basic characteristics, air leakage test results, and measured airflow rates of mechanical ventilation equipment. There is one EXCEL file containing TWO spreadsheets:
The home characters spreadsheet includes data for all homes. Each home data were in a column with each measured/estimateda parameter as a row. For the parameter that is not applicable to the test house, the cell is filled with “NA”. For the parameter that was not checked or measured by the field team, the cell is filled with “Not checked” or “Not measured” or “NM”. In some cases, the field team cannot determine the condition after field check, the cell is filled with “Unclear” or “cannot determined”.
Parameter description spreadsheet explains parameters in the homes characters spreadsheet one by one with the same order as the home characters spreadsheet (Column B). And the input abbreviations and general notes (Column C). If a cell in Column C was left blank, it means that there is nothing special to note for data input for the parameter in the row.
IAQ_Activity_Monitoring
This folder (IAQ_Activity_Monitoring.zip) contains time-resolved indoor and outdoor air quality data, including PM2.5 as measured by MetOne photometry (PM), Radon (Rn), indoor PM (PM1, PM25, PM10) concentrations measured by an IQair Air Visual Pro (AVP) low-cost sensor, carbon dioxide (CO2), formaldehyde (FRM), temperature (T), and relative humidity (RH) in different rooms. Data also included T and RH measured at the supply air register, attic and basement (AS, ATT, BS).
This folder also contains time series data of cooktop burners and oven monitored using iButton temperature sensors (IBU), other cooking devices monitored using AC power logger (PTR), whole house mechanical ventilation system, kitchen range hood and bathroom fan on/off monitored using either an anemometer (ANM) or a motor sensor (MTR), and open/close status of doors and windows monitored with state sensors (STA). There is one csv file of 1-minute time-series data for each measured week; two-week homes are marked as -ON and -OFF.
A specific read me file (IAQ_Activity_Monitoring_ReadMe) was included in the folder for data header definitions and data issues.
Most instruments had internal logging and special software to download data from the field instruments and convert the data files to csv format. One-minute resolution time-series data files were created for each house using a python script that pulled data from multiple csv files, aligned data by time, executed unit conversions, and interpolate data that were measured at different time resolutions. Visual review was conducted on the compiled files to check for translation or writing errors, indications of instrument malfunction, mislabeled units or unit conversion errors, mislabeled location, and time stamp errors. Missing data resulting from either instrument failure or invalid readings identified by researchers were filled with “NA” in each csv file.
IAQ_Sample
This folder (IAQ_Sample.zip) contains the results of time-integrated air quality samples, including passive measurements of formaldehyde, nitrogen dioxide and nitrogen oxides, and PM2.5 gravimetric filter measurements. There are three csv files containing each type of measurement.
Ogawa samplers
The passive Ogawa samplers were collected from test homes with gas cooking appliances. The csv file contains the exposure information, laboratory extract results from Ogawa samplers and the final calculated NO2, NO and NOx concentration in ppb and µg/m3. The spreadsheet contains the following columns.
Sampled home ID and Exposure information:
- Week: Measured week for each home, 1– for one week homes, week1 and week2 for two-week homes and on/off indicate the WHMV system status during that week
- Deployment Location: The samplers deployment location in each test homes. IN1–central location (living room); IN1D–Duplicates in the central location; OUT–outdoors; BLANK–field blank
- Start Time & Date and Stop Time & Date: the start and end times of the sampler deployment, recorded by the field team
- Elapsed Time (days) and Elapsed Time (min): the elapsed time calculated from start and end times in days and minutes
Environmental Data during exposure:
- Avg. RH% and Avg. Temp C: average relative humidity and indoor temperature during the exposure time in % and Celsius.
- PT: Water vapor pressure at exposure, calculated based on average indoor temperature (mm Hg)
- P: Water vapor coefficient calculated based on PT
- AlphaNO2 and AlphaNO: NO2 and NO adjust constants calculated based on Temperature, RH and PT.
IC Data from lab extraction and analysis:
- NO2 pad-Nitrite Conc: Raw NO2 pad concentration from IC extraction (ug/mL)
- NOx pad-Nitrite Conc: Raw NOx pad concentration from IC extraction (ug/mL)
- NO2 pad-Nitrite Conc. Blank Corrected: NO2 pad concentration from IC extraction corrected by the field blank (ug/mL)
- NOx pad-Nitrite Conc. Blank Corrected: NOx pad concentration from IC extraction corrected by the field blank (ug/mL)
Final calculated NO2/NO/NOx concentration:
- NO2/NO/NOx Blank Corrected: NO2/NO/NOx mass loaded on the pad, calculated from previous two columns (ng)
- NO2/NO/NOx: measured air NO2/NO/NOx concentration in ppb of each sample (ppb)
Notes: Notes from field team and researchers during the deployment and analysis. The cell is left blank if everything looks normal.
UMEx samplers
The UMEx passive samplers were collected from all test homes. The CSV file contains the exposure information and extract results for UMEx samplers. Samples were exposed for the full duration of sampling at test houses indoors and outdoors with field blanks deployed in a few homes. The exposure duration and extracts analysis results were listed. The final formaldehyde concentrations were calculated, as shown in the unit of parts per billion. The spreadsheet contains the following columns.
Sampled home ID and Exposure information:
- Week: Measured week for each home, 1– for one week homes, week1 and week2 for two-week homes and on/off indicate the WHMV system status during that week
- Deployment Location: The samplers deployment location in each test homes. IN1–central location (living room); IN1D–Duplicates in the central location; OUT–outdoors; BLANK–field blank
- Start Time & Date and Stop Time & Date: the start and end times of the sampler deployment, recorded by the field team
- Elapsed Time (days) and Elapsed Time (min): the elapsed time calculated from start and end times in days and minutes
- Volume: total volume of air passing through the sampler during the exposure time (L)
- Extraction Date: the date that the sample was analyzed in the laboratory
Lab analysis and results:
- Formaldehyde (ng): Total Formaldehyde mass loaded on the sampler during exposure time (ng)
- Blank (ng): Formaldehyde mass loaded on the field blank sample. If no field sample was deployed for this home, a study average value of 195 ng was used.
- Formaldehyde (ug/m3): Calculated Formaldehyde air concentration in each home in ug/m3
- Formaldehyde (ppb): Calculated Formaldehyde air concentration in each home in ppb
Notes: Notes from field team and researchers during the deployment and analysis. The cell is left blank if everything looks normal.
PEM samples
The PEM sampler collected gravimetric PM2.5 mass on a PTFE filter through a pump that continuously ran indoors (IN) and outdoors (OUT) at each test home. The gravimetric PM2.5 concentration was calculated using total volume of the air passing through the filter during the elapsed time and the mass load, as shown in the unit of microgram per cubic meter. Invalid measurements due to instrumentation or analysis were filled with “NA”. The spreadsheet contains the following columns.
Sampled home ID and Exposure information:
- Week: Measured week for each home, 1– for one week homes, week1 and week2 for two-week homes and on/off indicate the WHMV system status during that week. cross-cal# means the sample was used in a lab space for instrument cross calibration.
- Deployment Location: The samplers deployment location in each test homes. IN1–central location (living room); IN1D–Duplicates in the central location; OUT–outdoors; BLANK–field blank
- Start Time & Date and Stop Time & Date: the start and end times of the sampler deployment, recorded by the field team
- Elapsed Time (days) and Elapsed Time (min): the elapsed time calculated from start and end times in days and minutes
- Avg, Flow (LPM): The average flow rate of the pump extracting air for the PEM sampler (LPM) measured at Pre-deployment and post-deployment.
- Volume: total volume of air passing through the sampler during the exposure time (L)
Lab analysis and results:
- Mass Loading (ug): The mass load of PM2.5 on the filter, which was calculated based on the pre- and post weight of the PTFE filters.
- Conc (ug/m3) No Blank used: The calculated PM2.5 concentration for each sample, with no field blank subtracted from the value (ug/m3).
- Notes: Notes from field team and researchers during the deployment and analysis. The cell is left blank if everything looks normal.
Occupant_Activity
This folder (Occupant_Activity.zip) contains tabulated information provided by study participants from their daily activity logs. The PDF file is an example of the format of activity log used in the field study. A researcher manually transcribed the handwritten logs into a CSV file for each measured week in each home. There are a total of 32 CSV files named by home_ID + total days of record in the folder.
The activity logs were in hourly blocks, the blocks were filled with “X” or number of hours that an activity happened in this hour. If nothing happened in this hour, the block was left blank, without any “NA” filled. If other activities that were not listed in the logs happened, occupants were asked to fill in “other_event” rows and indicate in the “note”. The customized codes are summarized in ICRT_activity_logs_code.csv.
Occupant_Survey
This folder (Occupant_Survey.zip) contains survey results about the occupants, their general activities related to ventilation and IAQ satisfaction, completed by study participants. There is one csv file containing data transcribed by a researcher. In the csv file, each row represents the response from a home. Each column represents a survey question. The pdf file contains questions of the occupant surveys.
In some homes, the occupants did not complete the survey, the survey questions that were left blank were filled with “-99”. For the survey questions that are not available for the test house and household, the results are filled with “NA”. Human identification information have been masked.
WHMV_Config
This section (WHMV_Config.zip) provides detailed information about the Whole-House Mechanical Ventilation (WHMV) systems in each study home. The data were extracted from the Home_Characteristics spreadsheet, reviewed by researchers and field teams, and supplemented with additional information as needed. If discrepancies exist between the HomeCharacteristics table and the spreadsheets in this section, the information presented here should be considered authoritative. The folder has one excel file and one txt readme file contains some analysis notes.
The accompanying Excel file contains two worksheets:
Week 1 (AS-IS WHMV): documents the WHMV system condition observed when researchers first arrived at each home.
Week 2 (≥100% 62.2–2010): documents the WHMV condition in homes that underwent a second week of monitoring, during which multiple bathroom fans were operated continuously by the researcher to meet the WHMV requirements of ASHRAE 62.2–2010 and 62.2–2013.
Columns explanation:
- Ventilation Type (Field config): the WHMV type initially configured by the field team.
- Ventilation Type (Revised): the WHMV type revised, homes with bathroom fans that had a rated sound level <1 sones were considered as potential WHMV equipment to meet 62.2. Those homes were re-listed as EXH.
- Control Type: WHMV control type.
- Label At Controller: Label condition and whether it met 62.2 labeling requirements.
- WHMV operating on arrival: Whether WHMV was operating at the field team’s first arrival.
- 62.2-2010 min airflow (CFM): 62.2-2010 continuous ventilation minimum required airflow for each house.
- WHMV airflow (cfm) as found: the measured WHMV airflow at the field team’s first arrival.
- WHMV runtime (min/hr) as found: the WHMV runtime at the field team’s first arrival.
- Calculated WHMV airflow (cfm): effective WHMV airflow calculated from airflow and runtime
- Ratio: AS-FOUND ventilation rate 62.2-2010: ratio of WHMV airflow to 62.2-2010 requirement, shown in percentage.
- WHMV indoor/outdoor exhaust/intake location: WHMV exhaust and intake locations
- 2-week study: whether the house was undergone for a 2nd week study
Human subjects data
This study was reviewed and approved by the Central Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the U.S. Department of Energy. All participants provided written informed consent, which included permission to publish their de-identified data in the public domain for research and educational use. To protect participant privacy, all personally identifiable information (PII)—including names, addresses, precise geolocation, and contact information—has been removed or anonymized. Each home was assigned a randomly generated study ID that does not correspond to any internal or field-collected identifier. Time stamps were generalized as needed to prevent potential re-identification, and no free-text responses or media content are included. The dataset has been reviewed to ensure that the risk of re-identification is minimal, in compliance with established data protection standards.
Overview of the data collection
The basic structure of the study was to characterize the mechanical ventilation equipment functionality in each house through observations and performance measurements, monitor ventilation equipment usage, and measure air quality parameters indoors and outdoors over weeklong periods. Data were also collected by asking occupants to provide information about the household, their practices related to ventilation and pollutant sources and controls, and their satisfaction with air quality, thermal comfort, and other environmental factors in the home. Homes were monitored for one week with their WHMV operating as-found. In a subset of homes, the WHMV was configured by the research team to meet the ASHRAE 62.2–2013 continuous ventilation requirement and monitored for a second week. Due to limitations in finding homes with operable WHMV, local exhaust fans were utilized to meet ASHRAE 62.2.
Each study home was visited by a two-person field team at the start and end of each monitoring period. House and ventilation equipment characterization typically occurred during the first visit and included documenting the system configuration and as-found operational status. Observational data collected during the field team visits included ventilation equipment model numbers, filter ratings, filter location, type of cooking appliance, and other details. During this visit, the field team installed instrumentation to measure indoor and outdoor air quality parameters, operation of ventilation equipment, and the central forced air (CFA) system, use of the main cooking appliance, and the open-closed position of selected doors and windows. Two-week homes were visited between the weeks to collect and redeploy passive samplers, download data from some instruments, and change the WHMV equipment to meet ASHRAE 62.2. Air leakage of the building envelope and air distribution ducts of the CFA heating and cooling system typically occurred during the final visit. The team also asked the participant if they thought their home had a WHMV system and, if so, did they knew how to operate it.
Participants were asked to partake in normal household activities, with the exception that windows and doors should not be used for natural ventilation, and no smoking of any kind should be done inside the home during the data collection period. Participants were asked to complete an activity log for each day of the monitoring period, designed to record actual occupancy as well as routine and intermittent activities that could affect IAQ.
The study was reviewed and approved by the Central Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the U.S. Department of Energy.
Eligibility and recruitment
The study aimed to collect data in a sample of otherwise similar newly constructed single-family detached or attached homes being monitored with their WHMV in its as-found condition, and a subgroup of homes being monitored for a second week with their WHMV operating at the ASHRAE 62.2 2013 continuous ventilation requirement. The minimum eligibility criteria were that the home had to be constructed in 2013 or later and completed at least one year before data collection to reduce the potential impact of all materials in the home being very new (and potentially still in an initially higher emitting regime for formaldehyde) and occupants being too recently introduced to the house and its ventilation equipment. The goal was to study homes that were built to recent standards and with relatively new equipment.
The main outreach method for recruitment was through semi-regular advertisements on the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign’s faculty and staff weekly e-newsletter. A phone interview was conducted to screen homes for eligibility. To participate, they must have been newly constructed (2013 or later), single-family detached or attached homes, located in Illinois, be owner-occupied, and non-smoking. If a home was eligible, questions about the building characteristics and ventilation systems were asked over the phone. Participants were instructed that they would need to avoid opening exterior doors and windows during the monitoring period. All homes would participate for a minimum of one week with the WHMV system left in its current operating state (as-is). A subset of homes that had a venting range hood and multiple bathroom exhaust fans, of which the airflows could meet the ASHRAE 62.2-2013 continuous ventilation requirement, were invited to participate in an additional week of monitoring. During the second week, the bathroom exhaust fans were operated to meet the 62.2 airflow requirement, and the participants were informed not to modify them during the remaining monitoring period.
Additional recruitment was done through mail postcards in the Champaign and Urbana areas. Eligible homes were identified using a mix of local online data sources, including building permits (https://data.ccrpc.org/dataset/building-permits), property tax records (https://champaignil.devnetwedge.com/), and real-estate websites. Word of mouth from existing participants enrolled in the study also played a role in recruiting new homes.
Measuring and monitoring airflows and air leakage
Airflows were measured for WHMV systems, bathroom and kitchen exhaust fans, and clothes dryers. To determine inputs and coefficients for the natural infiltration model, a Delta-Q test was conducted in each home to measure building envelope and duct leakage, and to determine envelope leakage flow coefficient (c) and exponent (n).
Forced air heating and cooling system operation was monitored by deploying anemometers and TRH sensors at supply air registers. Exhaust fans were monitored by anemometers or motor on/off loggers. Cooking appliance usage was monitored by temperature sensors on the cooktop surface. Patio door, garage to house door, and main bedroom door status were recorded. Portable air cleaners, humidifiers, and other devices related to IAQ were monitored by plug load power meters.
Air quality measurements
Air quality measurements were conducted at both on-site outdoor and indoor locations. The devices used in this study for indoor and outdoor air quality measurements and their accuracy, deployment location are shown below.
| Measurement Device | Parameters | Accuracy(a) | Res. | Sampling locations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Met OneE-Sampler | Estimated PM2.5 by photometry; | Photometry: ± 10% to the gravimetric method, typical when K-factored to local particulate type (b). | 5min | Outdoor |
| Met One BT-645 Photometer | Estimated PM2.5 by photometry | ±5% traceable standard with 0.6 µm PSL, autozeroing function enabled to check baseline hourly(c) | 1 min | Indoor central |
| AirVisual Pro | Estimated PM2.5 by photometry, CO2, T, RH | CO2: ±50ppm or 2% of reading(d) | 10 sec–5min | Indoor central; Master BR; Office, secondary bedroom, or family room |
| Ogawa Passive Samplers | NO2 and NOx | Based on field validation(e): 7 d relative deviation of 3±2% NO2 at 11-37 ppb; 4±3% NOX at 16-85 ppb; 10±9% (NOX-NO2) at 4-56 ppb | 1 wk | Outdoor; indoor central |
| Graywolf FM-801 | HCHO | ±4 ppb <40 ppb, ±10% of reading ≥40 ppb | 30 min | Indoor central; Master BR |
| SKC UMEx-100 Passive | HCHO | ±25%, exceeds OSHA requirements | 1 wk | Outdoor; Indoor |
| Onset HOBO UX100-003, | T, RH | ±0.21 °C from 0 to 50 °C | 1 min | Outdoor, Indoor: master bedroom, master and secondary bathroom (U23); Laundry room (UX100-011); Central location, attic, basement (UX100-003); |
| RadStar RS300 | Radonshort-termrm | <10% deviation from 0.5 to 150 pCi/L | 60 min | Indoor: central and/or basement |
| AccuStar Alpha Track | Radon, long-term | General within ±15% to ±30% when deployed in the field for periods ≥3 months | 3–6 months | Indoor: central and/or basement |
| PEM Sampler | PM2.5 by gravimetric mass | Balance accuracy: 0.1µg | 1 wk | Indoor |
a. Based on manufacturer specifications unless otherwise noted.
b. We did not evaluate the K-factor for the device; thus, outdoor PM concentrations measured by MetOne need to be compared with local monitors and gravimetric mass results before using them for analysis
c. Cross checks between the indoor and outdoor MetOne units in the previous study showed close agreement. Therefore, no adjustment was applied to the indoor MetOne data in this dataset.
d. Co-location between AVP units found a good correlation in CO2 measurements.
e. Based on field validation in California reported by Singer et al. 2004.
f. The collected mass on a filter was determined as the difference in post and pre-exposure weights, and air concentrations were calculated using the sample volume calculated by the elapsed exposure time and sample airflow. See Quality Assurance sections for details
Participant survey and daily activity log
Before the field team visited the homes, participants were provided with and asked to respond to an online questionnaire that asked how they feel about their home environment and about the factors that can affect their IAQ. They were also asked about activities and product use and for information related to the home and household, including basic demographic and health-related questions. During the first visit, the field team provided participants with a printed activity log for each day of the monitoring period, designed to capture actual occupancy and routine and intermittent activities that could affect IAQ. This included prolonged opening of windows and doors, house cleaning, cooking, and burning candles. The log also had the occupant report periods of poor outdoor air quality, for example, from a nearby forest fire.
Acknowledgements
ICRT performed this work under contract to the Illinois Applied Research Institute, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (UIUC). ICRT moved from UIUC to the Champaign County Regional Planning Commission in July 2023. We acknowledge the contributions of former ICRT staff members J.S. (field work and instrumentation management) and S.G. (project management), who left before this date. We thank the residents who welcomed us into their homes during this project, and for working with us during the early days of the pandemic when home visits were more challenging to execute. We thank the UIUC School of Architecture and its students for producing floor plans at each site and the following for their contributions. E.W., co-conceived of the study, arranged funding, and managed the Building America program through which the study was implemented; L.B. helped administer the study for the Building America program; and both provided helpful input throughout the study development and data collection phases. R.M. program director for the Residential Energy Services Network, queried the rated homes database and provided records to assist with participant recruitment. Y.W. and A. J. helped to develop the dataset.
