Skip to main content
Dryad

Data and code from: Food resources are more important than nesting resources for explaining wild bee diversity in urban gardens

Data files

Aug 21, 2026 version files 80.20 KB

Click names to download individual files

Abstract

Wild bees are declining worldwide, with urbanisation as one major driver. Urban environments can filter for wild bees with specific functional traits and resource requirements. Nevertheless, cities can support many wild bee species, especially in urban gardens. Yet, we do not know how specific habitat features influence bee species persistence and community composition in gardens, which prevents implementing appropriate conservation measures.

We investigated how local and landscape garden features affect the taxonomic and functional diversity of wild bees and their community composition, and which garden features associate with wild bee functional guilds in urban community gardens.

Over two years, we surveyed community gardens in Munich and Berlin (Germany), assessed bees using flower observations and pan traps, and measured local and landscape garden features (food and nesting resources, habitat availability incl. urbanisation).

We found 168 wild bee species, ~1/3 of Germany's bee species. Floral richness was the main driver of bee taxonomic and functional diversity. Urbanisation, floral resources and open ground within gardens significantly affected bee community composition. Finally, we found associations between garden features and bee functional guilds. For example, the abundance of parasitic bees increased with floral richness, that of ground nesters with open ground and that of late-emerging species with urbanisation.

Urban gardens are important wild bee habitats in cities and spaces for conservation action. Diversifying available resources may support high bee diversity, and considering species functional traits and species requirements may further improve urban gardens and other urban ecosystems as bee habitats.