Skip to main content
Dryad

Data and code from: Moving towards better risk assessment for invertebrate conservation

Goodsell, Robert1; Tack, Ayco2; Ronquist, Fredrik1; van Dijk, Laura1; Iwaszkiewicz-Eggebrecht, Elzbieta1; Miraldo, Andreia1; Roslin, Tomas3; Vanhatalo, Jarno4

Research facility: Swedish Museum of Natural History
Published Jun 06, 2025 on Dryad. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.69p8cz987

Data files

Jun 06, 2025 version files 93.65 MB

Click names to download individual files

Abstract

Among the most widely used information underpinning international conservation efforts is the IUCN Red List of endangered species. The Red List designates species extinction risk based on geographic range, population size, or declines in either. However, the Red-List has poor representation of invertebrates, which comprise the majority of animal diversity, and it has frequently been questioned whether Red List criteria are appropriate for these organisms. Due to their small size, difficulty in identification, and general rarity, many invertebrates are hard to study, making the Red List criteria difficult to apply. Here we discuss these criticisms in the context of empirical evidence from one of the largest terrestrial arthropod surveys to date, documenting the abundance and distribution of over 13,000 species in Sweden. Using simple empirical examples from these data, we argue that even the most ambitious monitoring efforts are unlikely to produce enough observations to reliably estimate population sizes and ranges for more than a fraction of species. Thus, there is likely to be substantial uncertainty in classifying most species according to current criteria. In response, we discuss the introduction of potential new IUCN criteria to more accurately capture the conservation needs of invertebrates, and to increase the representation of invertebrates on the IUCN Red List.