Summer but not spring resource supplementation improves bumblebee colony survival
Data files
Nov 07, 2025 version files 193.57 KB
-
Habitat_proportion_data_by_cluster.xlsx
15.56 KB
-
Overall_colony_data.xlsx
39.52 KB
-
Overall_weekly_data.xlsx
128.14 KB
-
README.md
10.34 KB
Abstract
Global agricultural expansion has led to the deterioration of many key foraging habitats for bees, but the impacts of nutritional stress caused by temporal gaps in food availability can be hard to isolate from other agricultural stressors. For bumblebee colonies (Bombus spp.), which have an annual lifecycle culminating in a summer reproductive period, this issue is further complicated by potential variation in vulnerability over the colony lifecycle. Isolating the effects of nutritional stress on bumblebee colonies could therefore direct agricultural interventions that seek to mitigate against further decline. We assayed whether available food resources are limiting colony productivity and survival by supplementing post-worker emergence Bombus terrestris colonies with ad libitum food during mid-spring or early summer on 20 farms across south-east England (“earlier” vs “later” treatments). In mid-spring, forage is potentially more abundant, but colonies are at an earlier developmental stage, while in early summer, colonies are more established, and forage is potentially sparser. Later-supplemented colonies survived for significantly longer than both unsupplemented controls and earlier-supplemented colonies. We found no detectable effects of supplementary feeding on reproductive output, which was minimal overall. Colonies in areas dominated by non-flowering arable crops failed soonest and had fewer workers irrespective of the feeding regime, and colonies experiencing higher weekly precipitation produced fewer workers. Our findings suggest that B. terrestris colonies became food-limited towards the end of their colony cycle in early summer. We suggest ecological intensification through planting native wildflower species may be more effective if it targets this flowering period, particularly within heavily arable areas, and that a staggered patchwork of mowing or grazing could be important in ensuring seasonal resource continuity.
Dataset DOI: 10.5061/dryad.6djh9w1g5
Description of the data and file structure
Over the course of April-August 2024, we placed 60 hand-reared bumblebee colonies on 20 farms around SE England, with 3 colonies on each farm. We initiated a staggered feeding experiment in order to identify periods of lower pollinator resource availability and greater vulnerability. One colony at each site was given excess pollen and sugar syrup for 3 weeks from April-May, another for 3 weeks from May-June (no overlap), with the remaining colony at each site acting as a negative control and not receiving any food. Throughout the experimental period, we visited each site and colony weekly at night, collecting data including but not limited to the number of alive and dead workers; queen status (alive/dead/absent); presence of invasive/usurping queens; and number of reproductive individuals. The weekly data recorded is available in 'Overall weekly data', and the performance of each colony (e.g., time survived, peak worker number, sum of reproductive individuals produced) is available in 'Overall colony data'. 'Habitat proportion data by cluster' entails the proportion of land-use and habitat category (e.g., non-flowering arable land, land under countryside stewardship schemes, impervious surfaces) within a 500m radius of each farm site, split into one of four general habitat classifications (e.g,. non-flowering arable heavy; pasture mixed)
Files and variables
Where appropriate, missing values for all files are NA
File: Habitat_proportion_data_by_cluster.xlsx
Description: Custom habitat and land-use classification; proportion of each within 500m of the farm site
Variables
- Cluster: method to group farms into similar land-types
- Farm: site identifier, remaining abbreviated for purposes of privacy
- NFA: proportion of non-flowering arable land within 500m of site
- FA: proportion of flowering arable land within 500m of site
- UKA: proportion of unknown arable land within 500m of site
- TOTPAS: proportion of pasture/grassland within 500m of site
- FC: proportion of forest cover within 500m of site
- HR: proportion of hedgerow within 500m of site
- CSS: proportion of land under countryside stewardship schemes within 500m of site
- ORC: proportion of orchard cover within 500m of site
- IMP: proportion of impervious surface within 500m of site
- GAR: proportion of garden cover within 500m of site
- WAT: proportion of water cover within 500m of site
File: Overall_colony_data.xlsx
Description: Synthesised data for each individual colony over the experimental period
Variables
- site: site identifier, remaining abbreviated for purposes of privacy
- site.num: site number by order of visit
- farm_clus: farm cluster by order of visit
- colony: colony ID by queen rearing number
- treatment: supplemental feeding treatment
- workinit: number of workers at time of field placement
- workpeak: peak worker count after placement
- q.status: queen status at point of colony removal
- q.status2: binary count of queen status at point of colony removal
- q.mori: week of experiment in which the queen died or was removed
- mori.week: week of experiment in which the colony was declared moribund and removed
- totmal: total number of males produced by colony
- totgyn: total number of gynes produced by colony
- totrep: total number of reproductives (males and gynes) produced
- repem: week of the experiment in which the colony's first reproductive was detected
- repbin: binary count whether the colony produced a reproductive or not
- initprecip: precipitation (mm) in the first week of placement at site
- meanprecip: mean weekly precipitation (mm) at site
- mori.precip: precipitation (mm) at each site in the week prior to colony moribundity
- c.status: binary count of colony status at the end of the experiment
- NFAC: proportion of non-flowering arable (conventionally farmed) land within 500m of site
- NFAR: proportion of non-flowering arable (regeneratively farmed) land within 500m of site
- NFAO: proportion of non-flowering arable (organically farmed) land within 500m of site
- NFA: proportion of non-flowering arable land within 500m of site
- FAC: proportion of flowering arable (conventionally farmed) land within 500m of site
- FAR: proportion of flowering arable (regeneratively farmed) land within 500m of site
- FAO: proportion of flowering arable (organically farmed) land within 500m of site
- FA: proportion of total flowering arable land within 500m of site
- UKA: proportion of unknown arable land within 500m of site
- ORC: proportion of orchard cover within 500m of site
- PC: Proportion of pasture (conventional) cover within a 500m radius
- PR: Proportion of pasture (regenerative) cover within a 500m radius
- PO: Proportion of pasture (organic) cover within a 500m radius
- GC: Proportion of grassland (conventional) cover within a 500m radius
- GR: Proportion of grassland (regenerative) cover within a 500m radius
- GO: Proportion of grassland (organic) cover within a 500m radius
- UKP: Proportion of unknown pasture/grassland cover within a 500m radius
- TOTPAS: proportion of total pasture/grassland within 500m of site
- AB1: Proportion of Countryside Stewardship Scheme (CSS) AB1 cover within a 500m radius
- AB8: Proportion of CSS AB8 cover within a 500m radius
- AB9: Proportion of CSS AB9 cover within a 500m radius
- AB11: Proportion of CSS AB11 cover within a 500m radius
- AB16: Proportion of CSS AB16 cover within a 500m radius
- HabRes: Proportion of habitat restoration scheme cover within a 500m radius
- UKM: Proportion of unknown CSS cover within a 500m radius
- CSS: proportion of land under countryside stewardship schemes within 500m of site
- FC: proportion of forest cover within 500m of site
- HR: proportion of hedgerow within 500m of site
- IMP: proportion of impervious surface within 500m of site
- GAR: proportion of garden cover within 500m of site
- WAT: proportion of water cover within 500m of site
- PC1: value of the first land-use principal component for that site
- PC2: value of the second land-use principal component for that site
- pca_clus: 1 of the 4 land-use clusters that the site was placed into following Ward's method of cluster analysis
File: Overall_weekly_data.xlsx
Description: Week-by-week data recorded for each colony visit and assessment
Variables
- week: week of experiment
- date: date of visit (nightwork often crossed midnight so the same date isn't indicative of the same night visit)
- site: site identifier, remaining abbreviated for purposes of privacy
- site.num: site number by order of visit
- farm_clus: farm cluster by order of visit
- colony: colony ID by queen rearing number
- time: time of visit
- treatment: supplemental feeding treatment
- status: status of the queen at the visit
- W1: first worker count
- W2: second worker count
- W3: third worker count
- Wmean: mean of the 3 worker counts
- Wdead: number of dead workers present in colony
- usurp: status of usurping Bombus terrestris queens
- para: status of parasitic Bombus vestalis queens
- wcover: degree of brood wax cover
- egg: number of egg cells
- larval: number of larval and pupal cells
- disL: number of discarded larvae present
- mal: number of males present
- gyn: number of gynes present
- gynP: number of gyne pupae identified
- precip: precipitation (mm) in the week prior to visit
- removed: binary count of whether the colony was declared moribund and removed
- NFAC: proportion of non-flowering arable (conventionally farmed) land within 500m of site
- NFAR: proportion of non-flowering arable (regeneratively farmed) land within 500m of site
- NFAO: proportion of non-flowering arable (organically farmed) land within 500m of site
- NFA: proportion of total non-flowering arable land within 500m of site
- FAC: proportion of flowering arable (conventionally farmed) land within 500m of site
- FAR: proportion of flowering arable (regeneratively farmed) land within 500m of site
- FAO: proportion of flowering arable (organically farmed) land within 500m of site
- FA: proportion of total flowering arable land within 500m of site
- UKA: proportion of unknown arable land within 500m of site
- ORC: proportion of orchard cover within 500m of site
- PC: Proportion of pasture (conventional) cover within a 500m radius
- PR: Proportion of pasture (regenerative) cover within a 500m radius
- PO: Proportion of pasture (organic) cover within a 500m radius
- GC: Proportion of grassland (conventional) cover within a 500m radius
- GR: Proportion of grassland (regenerative) cover within a 500m radius
- GO: Proportion of grassland (organic) cover within a 500m radius
- UKP: Proportion of unknown pasture/grassland cover within a 500m radius
- TOTPAS: proportion of pasture/grassland within 500m of site
- AB1: Proportion of Countryside Stewardship Scheme (CSS) AB1 cover within a 500m radius
- AB8: Proportion of CSS AB8 cover within a 500m radius
- AB9: Proportion of CSS AB9 cover within a 500m radius
- AB11: Proportion of CSS AB11 cover within a 500m radius
- AB16: Proportion of CSS AB16 cover within a 500m radius
- HabRes: Proportion of habitat restoration scheme cover within a 500m radius
- UKM: Proportion of unknown CSS cover within a 500m radius
- CSS: proportion of land under countryside stewardship schemes within 500m of site
- FC: proportion of forest cover within 500m of site
- HR: proportion of hedgerow within 500m of site
- IMP: proportion of impervious surface within 500m of site
- GAR: proportion of garden cover within 500m of site
- WAT: proportion of water cover within 500m of site
- PC1: value of the first land-use principal component for that site
- PC2: value of the second land-use principal component for that site
- pca_clus: 1 of the 4 land-use clusters that the site was placed into following Ward's method of cluster analysis
Code/software
Made and uploaded in Excel, but can also be viewed in Google Sheets
Access information
Other publicly accessible locations of the data:
- None
Data was derived from the following sources:
- NA
