The combination of miniaturized GPS/VHF tags and soluble backpack harness as an effective method for tracking lightweight and elusive birds
Data files
May 26, 2025 version files 186.06 KB
-
Distance_Gamma2.csv
169.87 KB
-
Figure_3.csv
443 B
-
Figure_4.csv
1.14 KB
-
GLMM_Analysis.R
6.70 KB
-
README.md
6 KB
-
weight_changes_t_test.csv
1.90 KB
Abstract
The use of Global Positioning System (GPS) tags is increasingly widespread for wildlife tracking in many ecological studies. However, GPS tags are often too heavy for lightweight species or require recapturing the animal to download the data.
In this study, we designed a water-soluble backpack harness linked to a handmade GPS+VHF tag combination to obtain GPS data without the need to recapture the animal. Once the harness disintegrates after rainfall, the GPS+VHF tags can be located via radiotracking, and the dataset can be downloaded. Specifically, we (1) assessed the most effective way to attach the VHF tag to the GPS (to minimize data loss in terms of quantity and quality), (2) tested effects on wild birds, and (3) evaluated the efficiency of device retrieval by tagging Dupont's larks (Chersophilus duponti), a small (~40 g), elusive passerine.
Results showed that the VHF tag should be attached to the GPS at a 45º angle to avoid negative effects on GPS data. To reduce GPS location error, we recommend using data obtained with ≥5 satellites and, ideally, >7 satellites, for average errors less than 10 meters. All devices (100%) were detached from the birds and successfully retrieved. No adverse effects were detected in the birds after the tagging period, and all birds remained in their territories.
This methodology can be highly useful for studies involving lightweight and elusive fauna. Additionally, our system reduces stress on individuals by minimizing the number of captures required, while also lowering human resource costs, as a single person can carry out the entire process.
Dataset DOI: 10.5061/dryad.6m905qgbz
Description of the data and file structure
In the set of files, you will find the data matrix and the R script where the analytical process is detailed step by step with thorough explanations. Each column of the data matrix and each file used is referenced with the same name in the R scripts.
Files and variables
We have submitted our raw data on the field trials assessing the accuracy of the nanoFix® GEO-mini (Distance_Gamma2.csv), the evaluation of their effect on bird weight (weight_changes_t_test.csv), and the data used to produce Figures 3 (Figure_3) and 4 (Figure_4).
Descriptions
Distance_Gamma2.csv
- Tag:Identification code of each nanoFix® GEO-mini
- Code_test: Code for each field trial conducted
- Position: Classification for assessing the effect of attaching the VHF tag to the nanoFix® GEO-mini: without VHF tag attached, attached in an elevated position, attached in a position parallel to the nanoFix® GEO-mini.
- timestamp: Date and time data (excluding seconds) combined and used as a random factor.
- satellites: Number of satellites used by the nanoFix® GEO-mini to record each location.
- Distance: Distance (m) calculated between the actual field location of the nanoFix® GEO-mini (recorded using a handheld GPS) and the location registered by the nanoFix® GEO-mini.
- Accuracy: Location accuracy indicator provided in the data output by the manufacturer (Pathtrack).
weight_changes_t_test.csv
- Individual_code: Numeric identification code of each ringed bird.
- GPS_deployment: Whether the bird carried a device (Yes/No)
- Capture1: Date and time of the bird's first capture
- weight1: Bird's weight at first capture
- Capture 2: Date and time of the bird's second capture
- weight2: Timestamp of the bird’s recapture
- Time (days): Time elapsed (in days) between the two captures
- Weight_difference: Weight difference (g) between the two captures
- weight_change(%): Percentage change in weight between the two captures
- Mean: Average percentage of weight loss for the group of birds that carried a device and for those that did not.
- Average_date: Mean date between capture and recapture
- Average Day: Mean day between dates
- daily_weight_change: Daily weight loss or gain (g)
- daily weight change(%): Daily percentage of weight loss or gain (g)
- Average: Mean daily percentage weight loss
- SE: Standard error of the mean daily percentage weight loss
- Sex: Sex of each bird
- Days_with_device: Number of days the device was carried
Figure_3
- Num satélites: Number of satellites used to obtain each point in the field trials
- Without VHF: Number of locations recorded by the nanoFix® GEO-mini when no VHF tag was attached
- Raised: Number of locations recorded by the nanoFix® GEO-mini when a VHF tag was attached at a 45º elevated position
- Parallel: Number of locations recorded by the nanoFix® GEO-mini when a VHF tag was attached in a parallel position
- Without VHF(%): Percentage of locations recorded by the nanoFix® GEO-mini when no VHF tag was attached
- Raised(%): Percentage of locations recorded by the nanoFix® GEO-mini when a VHF tag was attached at a 45º elevated position
- Parallel(%): Percentage of locations recorded by the nanoFix® GEO-mini when a VHF tag was attached in a parallel position
Figure_4
- Satellites: Number of satellites used to record the locations
- Without VHF: Average number of locations recorded by the nanoFix® GEO-mini without any attached tag for a given number of satellites
- conf.low_WV: Lower confidence interval limit of the average number of locations recorded by the nanoFix® GEO-mini without any attached tag, for a given number of satellites
- conf.high_WV: Upper confidence interval limit of the average number of locations recorded by the nanoFix® GEO-mini without any attached tag, for a given number of satellites
- Raised: Average number of locations recorded by the nanoFix® GEO-mini with a VHF tag attached in a 45º elevated position, for a given number of satellites
- conf.low_R: Lower confidence interval limit of the average number of locations recorded by the nanoFix® GEO-mini with a VHF tag attached at a 45º elevated position, for a given number of satellites
- conf.high_R: Upper confidence interval limit of the average number of locations recorded by the nanoFix® GEO-mini with a VHF tag attached at a 45º elevated position, for a given number of satellites
- Parallel: Average number of locations recorded by the nanoFix® GEO-mini with a VHF tag attached in a parallel position, for a given number of satellites
- conf.low_P: Lower confidence interval limit of the average number of locations recorded by the nanoFix® GEO-mini with a VHF tag attached in a parallel position, for a given number of satellites
- conf.high_P: Upper confidence interval limit of the average number of locations recorded by the nanoFix® GEO-mini with a VHF tag attached in a parallel position, for a given number of satellites
- Parallel_LOW: Difference between the mean and the lower confidence for 'Parallel'
- Parallel_UP: Difference between the mean and the upper confidence for 'Parallel'
- Raised_LOW: Difference between the mean and the lower confidence for 'Raised'
- Raised_UP: Difference between the mean and the upper confidence for 'Raised'
- Without VHF_LOW: Difference between the mean and the lower confidence for 'Without VHF'
- Without VHF_UP: Difference between the mean and the upper confidence for 'Without VHF'
Code/Software: GLMM_Analysis
R is required to run GLMM_Analysis; the script was created using version 4.4.2 (2024-10-31 ucrt)
Annotations are provided throughout the script through 1) library loading, 2) dataset loading and cleaning, 3) analyses, and 4) figure creation.
