Skip to main content
Dryad

Data and code to compare acoustic ARU and point count data for shorebird species presence across Alaska's North Slope

Data files

Jan 21, 2026 version files 485.33 MB

Click names to download individual files

Abstract

The rapid decline of global bird populations demands effective monitoring approaches, particularly for shorebirds, which are experiencing alarming population decreases. Most shorebird surveys rely on traditional visual survey methods, but face significant challenges in remote locations like the Arctic, where high costs and logistical constraints limit survey effort and duration. We compared visual area search surveys and acoustic recording units (ARUs) for monitoring shorebird species in two large regions of Alaska's Arctic Coastal Plain in 2022-2023. We deployed ARUs at 129 sites (54 in Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, ANWR, 75 in Teshekpuk Lake Special Area, TESH; ~11,000-18,000 hours of acoustic recordings) where visual surveys were also conducted (~83-113 hours in total), and examined differences in species richness, encounter rates, and predicted distribution patterns for 12 shorebird species or species groups. ARUs detected 50% higher species richness in ANWR and 33% at TESH (approximately 2 additional species per plot); the odds of encountering a species were more than twice as high with ARUs compared to visual surveys (95%CI = 1.64-5.57). Species accumulation curves demonstrated that ARUs required fewer plots to detect the maximum number of species. Habitat models based on ARU data produced similar predicted distributions to visual survey data but enabled modeling for additional species due to higher encounter rates. Different survey methods showed consistent spatial patterns between sites, with both methods detecting higher species richness and encounter rates in TESH than in ANWR. Our findings demonstrate that ARUs can effectively monitor shorebird communities in the Arctic, offering advantages in temporal coverage and synchronous data collection across large spatial extents. The performance of ARUs for detecting most shorebird species over long periods supports their integration into conservation monitoring programs, particularly in remote regions where traditional monitoring approaches are challenging to implement and sustain.