Mechanical properties and cuticle organisation in mandibles are related to the task specialisation in leafcutter ants (Atta laevigata, Attini, Formicidae)
Data files
Sep 15, 2025 version files 102.64 MB
-
Data.xlsx
216.74 KB
-
L01_circumferential_01.mss
4.35 MB
-
L01_circumferential_02.mss
2.81 MB
-
L01_circumferential_03.mss
4.27 MB
-
L01_longitudinal.mss
4.51 MB
-
L02_circumferential_01.mss
2.78 MB
-
L02_circumferential_02.mss
4.54 MB
-
L02_longitudinal.mss
2.79 MB
-
L03_circumferential_01.mss
3.22 MB
-
L03_circumferential_02.mss
4.64 MB
-
L03_longitudinal.mss
1.69 MB
-
L04_circumferential_01.mss
2.92 MB
-
L04_circumferential_02.mss
2.68 MB
-
L04_longitudinal.mss
2.85 MB
-
L05_circumferential_01.mss
3.10 MB
-
L05_circumferential_02.mss
5.47 MB
-
L05_longitudinal.mss
6.42 MB
-
README.md
4.01 KB
-
S01_circumferential_01.mss
4.31 MB
-
S01_circumferential_02.mss
3.69 MB
-
S01_longitudinal.mss
2.24 MB
-
S02_circumferential_01.mss
2.64 MB
-
S02_circumferential_02.mss
4.43 MB
-
S02_longitudinal.mss
2.13 MB
-
S03_circumferential_01.mss
5.41 MB
-
S03_longitudinal.mss
2.84 MB
-
S04_circumferential_01.mss
4.96 MB
-
S04_longitudinal.mss
3.26 MB
-
S05_circumferential_01.mss
4.56 MB
-
S05_longitudinal.mss
2.89 MB
Abstract
Leafcutter ants show a high degree of task division among the workers of different castes. For example, the smallest workers, the minims, care for the brood and the symbiotic fungus, whereas the larger mediae cut and transport plant material. This is reflected in the size and morphology of the mandibles, but also in their mechanical properties as mediae possess the hardest and stiffest cuticle and the minims - the softest and most flexible one. This is directly related to the content of the cross-linking transition metal zinc (Zn).
The cuticle microstructure, which can be more or less anisotropic depending of the orientation of cuticle layers, is known to determine the resistance to loads and stresses and thus contributes to the biomechanical behaviour of the structure. To study how the mandible tasks are related to the cuticular organisation, we here documented the microstructure of the mandibles from the mediae and the minims by scanning electron microscopy. Afterwards, the mechanical properties (Youngs’ modulus, E and hardness, H) of the exo-, meso- and endocuticle were identified by nanoindentation. Tests were performed along the longitudinal and the circumferential axes of the mandibles. We found, that the minims possess mandibles, which are more isotropic, whereas the mandibles of the mediae are rather anisotropic. This difference was never determined within one species before and is probably linked to the task of the individual ant. To gain insight into the origins of these properties, we characterized the elemental composition of the different cuticle layers along the circumferential axis, revealing that only the exocuticle of the mandible cutting edge contains Zn. All other mechanical property gradients thus must be the result of the chitin fibre bundle architecture or the properties of the protein matrix, which awaits further investigation.
Dataset DOI: 10.5061/dryad.9zw3r22r6
Description of the data and file structure
These files are the raw files from the nanoindentor. The Excel file is provided as an accessible version of the data.
Files and variables
File: Data.xlsx
Description: Data on each measurement point. One sheet contains the elemental data, each elemental content given in atomic %. One sheet contains the nanoindentation data, hardness and Young's modulus, each given in GPa. The ant castes, the testing direction, mandible side, mandible region of each test are given.
File: L01_circumferential_02.mss
Description: Tested in circumferential direction, large ant caste
File: L01_circumferential_01.mss
Description: Tested in circumferential direction, large ant caste
File: L02_circumferential_01.mss
Description: Tested in circumferential direction, large ant caste
File: L02_circumferential_02.mss
Description: Tested in circumferential direction, large ant caste
File: L01_circumferential_03.mss
Description: Tested in circumferential direction, large ant caste
File: L02_longitudinal.mss
Description: Tested in longitudinal direction, large ant caste
File: L01_longitudinal.mss
Description: Tested in longitudinal direction, large ant caste
File: L03_circumferential_01.mss
Description: Tested in circumferential direction, large ant caste
File: L03_longitudinal.mss
Description: Tested in longitudinal direction, large ant caste
File: L04_circumferential_02.mss
Description: Tested in circumferential direction, large ant caste
File: L04_circumferential_01.mss
Description: Tested in circumferential direction, large ant caste
File: L04_longitudinal.mss
Description: Tested in longitudinal direction, large ant caste
File: L05_circumferential_01.mss
Description: Tested in circumferential direction, large ant caste
File: L05_circumferential_02.mss
Description: Tested in circumferential direction, large ant caste
File: L03_circumferential_02.mss
Description: Tested in circumferential direction, large ant caste
File: S01_longitudinal.mss
Description: Tested in longitudinal direction, small ant caste
File: S01_circumferential_02.mss
Description: Tested in circumferential direction, small ant caste
File: L05_longitudinal.mss
Description: Tested in longitudinal direction, large ant caste
File: S01_circumferential_01.mss
Description: Tested in circumferential direction, small ant caste
File: S02_circumferential_01.mss
Description: Tested in circumferential direction, small ant caste
File: S02_circumferential_02.mss
Description: Tested in circumferential direction, small ant caste
File: S02_longitudinal.mss
Description: Tested in longitudinal direction, small ant caste
File: S03_circumferential_01.mss
Description: Tested in circumferential direction, small ant caste
File: S03_longitudinal.mss
Description: Tested in longitudinal direction, small ant caste
File: S04_longitudinal.mss
Description: Tested in longitudinal direction, small ant caste
File: S04_circumferential_01.mss
Description: Tested in circumferential direction, small ant caste
File: S05_longitudinal.mss
Description: Tested in longitudinal direction, small ant caste
File: S05_circumferential_01.mss
Description: Tested in circumferential direction, small ant caste
Code/software
Testworks 4, by MTS Systems, Excel
Access information
Other publicly accessible locations of the data:
- n/a
Data was derived from the following sources:
- n/a
Nanoindentation was performed with the same samples and at the same regions in circumferential direction (along the length of the mandible; terminology of testing direction after Li et al., 2019). They were attached to the sample holders following established protocols (Krings et al., 2022a, 2022b). Each region of interest was tested at room temperature with an SA2 nanoindenter (MTS Nano Instruments, Oak Ridge, USA) with a Berkovich diamond tip and a dynamic contact module (DCM) head was utilized. Nanoindentation tip calibration was performed with glass and the resulting force/displacement curves were stable in the depth from 150 to 1500 nm (which was the end of the test). The Young’s modulus (E) was calculated via the Oliver–Pharr method (Oliver & Pharr, 1992). Hardness (H) and E were determined from force-distance curves using the continuous stiffness mode (CSM). The Poisson’s ratio was set to 0.3 and the allowable drift rate to 0.1 nm/s. All tests were conducted under normal room conditions (relative humidity 28–30%, temperature 22–24 °C), with each indent and corresponding curve manually controlled. Due to the Pt sputter coating, E and H were determined at penetration depth ranging from 600 to 800 nm. Approximately 40 values were obtained from this indentation depth for each site, which were then averaged to calculate one mean H and one mean E value per indent.
