Data from: Male size does not affect the strength of male mate choice for high-quality females in Drosophila melanogaster
Data files
Sep 22, 2023 version files 42.85 KB
-
bwFemaleSizes.csv
219 B
-
CourtshipEffort.csv
6.15 KB
-
CourtshipEffortJMPlog.rtf
1.32 KB
-
FemaleFecundity.csv
1.14 KB
-
FemaleFecundity.R
627 B
-
FemaleRemating.csv
879 B
-
FemaleRematingJMPlogs.rtf
3.46 KB
-
LFRematingP1.csv
955 B
-
LFRematingP1.R
608 B
-
MaleSizesFecundity.csv
242 B
-
MaleSizesLarvDensity.csv
230 B
-
MaleSizesMMCB1.csv
253 B
-
MaleSizesMMCB2.csv
241 B
-
MaleSizesRemating.csv
243 B
-
MaleSizesRematingbw.csv
181 B
-
MatingData.csv
3.66 KB
-
MatingData.R
1.28 KB
-
MatingDuration.csv
3.08 KB
-
MatingDurationJMPlog.rtf
1.36 KB
-
PreferenceIndex.csv
3.46 KB
-
PreferenceIndexJMPlogs.rtf
2.07 KB
-
README.md
11.20 KB
Abstract
Theory predicts that the strength of male mate choice should vary depending on male quality when higher-quality males receive greater fitness benefits from being choosy. This pattern extends to differences in male body size, with larger males often having stronger pre- and post-copulatory preferences than smaller males.We sought to determine whether large males and small males differ in the strength (or direction) of their preference for large, high-fecundity females using the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster. We measured male courtship preferences and mating duration to show that male body size had no impact on the strength of male mate choice; all males, regardless of their size, had equally strong preferences for large females. To understand the selective pressures shaping male mate choice in males of different sizes, we also measured the fitness benefits associated with preferring large females for both large and small males. Male body size did not affect the benefits that males received: large and small males were equally successful at mating with large females, received the same direct fitness benefits from mating with large females, and showed similar competitive fertilization success with large females. These findings provide insight into why the strength of male mate choice was not affected by male body size in this system. Our study highlights the importance of evaluating the benefits and costs of male mate choice across multiple males to predict when differences in male mate choice should occur.
Authors
Avigayil Lev and Alison Pischedda*
Department of Biology, Barnard College
*apischedda@barnard.edu
Description of the data and file structure
MaleSizesMMCB1.csv
Male size data for Block 1 of the Male Mate Choice Trials. Data are displayed in Figure S1a.
- “Sieve Hole Diameter” = sieve hole diameter (in ?m) for the 12 sieves used for size sorting
- “Total # Males” = the total number of males found within each sieve after size sorting
- “# Selected Males” = the number of males from each sieve selected for this experiment. Blank cells indicate that males were not selected from the corresponding sieves.
- “Selected Male Size” = whether the selected males were used as large or small males for this experiment. Blank cells indicate that males were not selected from the corresponding sieves.
MaleSizesMMCB2.csv
Male size data for Block 2 of the Male Mate Choice Trials. Data are displayed in Figure S1b.
- “Sieve Hole Diameter” = sieve hole diameter (in ?m) for the 12 sieves used for size sorting
- “Total # Males” = the total number of males found within each sieve after size sorting.
- “# Selected Males” = the number of males from each sieve selected for this experiment. Blank cells indicate that males were not selected from the corresponding sieves.
- “Selected Male Size” = whether the selected males were used as large or small males for this experiment. Blank cells indicate that males were not selected from the corresponding sieves.
MaleSizesFecundity.csv
Male size data for the Female Fecundity Experiment. Data are displayed in Figure S1c.
- “Sieve Hole Diameter” = sieve hole diameter (in ?m) for the 12 sieves used for size sorting
- “Total # Males” = the total number of males found within each sieve after size sorting
- “# Selected Males” = the number of males from each sieve selected for this experiment. Blank cells indicate that males were not selected from the corresponding sieves.
- “Selected Male Size” = whether the selected males were used as large or small males for this experiment. Blank cells indicate that males were not selected from the corresponding sieves.
MaleSizesRemating.csv
Male size data for the LHm males collected for the Remating Experiment. Data are displayed in Figure S1d.
- “Sieve Hole Diameter” = sieve hole diameter (in ?m) for the 12 sieves used for size sorting
- “Total # Males” = the total number of males found within each sieve after size sorting
- “# Selected Males” = the number of males from each sieve selected for this experiment. Blank cells indicate that males were not selected from the corresponding sieves.
- “Selected Male Size” = whether the selected males were used as large or small males for this experiment. Blank cells indicate that males were not selected from the corresponding sieves.
MaleSizesRematingbw.csv
Male size data for the LHm-bw competitor males used in the Remating Experiment. Data are displayed in Figure S1e.
- “Sieve Hole Diameter” = sieve hole diameter (in ?m) for the 12 sieves used for size sorting
- “Total # Males” = the total number of males found within each sieve after size sorting
- “# Selected Competitor Males” = the number of males from each sieve to be used as competitors for this experiment. Blank cells indicate that males were not selected from the corresponding sieves.
MaleSizesLarvDensity.csv
Male size data for a set of Large and Small LHm males created from the larval density manipulations used for our experiments.
- “Sieve Hole Diameter” = sieve hole diameter (in ?m) for the 18 sieves used for size sorting
- “Large Males” = the number of males from the Large treatment found within each sieve after size sorting
- “Small Males” = the number of males from the Small treatment found within each sieve after size sorting
bwFemaleSizes.csv
Female size data for a set of Large and Small LHm-bw females created from the larval density manipulations used for our experiments.
- “Sieve Hole Diameter” = sieve hole diameter (in ?m) for the 16 sieves used for size sorting
- “Large Females” = the number of females from the Large treatment found within each sieve after size sorting
- “Small Females” = the number of females from the Small treatment found within each sieve after size sorting
CourtshipEffort.csv
Courtship effort data from the Male Mate Choice Trials. Data are displayed in Figure 2a.
- “Block” = experimental block (“B1” = Block 1, “B2” = Block 2)
- “Set” = first or second set of observations that occurred within each block (“S1” = Set 1, “S2” = Set 2)
- “Observer” = observer who collected the courtship data
- “Male Size” = size of the courting male (“L” = large, “S” = small)
- “Courtship Effort” = raw courtship effort data
- “Log Courtship Effort” = log transformed courtship effort data
PreferenceIndex.csv
Preference index (PI) data from the Male Mate Choice Trials. Data are displayed in Figure 2b.
- “Block” = experimental block (“B1” = Block 1, “B2” = Block 2)
- “Set” = first or second set of observations that occurred within each block (“S1” = Set 1, “S2” = Set 2)
- “Observer” = observer who collected the courtship data
- “Male Size” = size of the courting male (“L” = large, “S” = small)
- “PI” = preference index data
MatingData.csv
Mating Success data, Size of female mated data, and courtship threshold to mate data from the Male Mate Choice Trials. Mating success and size of female mated data are reported in the manuscript text, courtship threshold to mate data are displayed in Figure 3a.
- “Block” = experimental block (“B1” = Block 1, “B2” = Block 2)
- “Set” = first or second set of observations that occurred within each block (“S1” = Set 1, “S2” = Set 2)
- “Observer” = observer who collected the courtship data
- “MaleSize” = size of the male (“L” = large, “S” = small)
- “MatingSuccess” = whether or not the male mated during the male mate choice trial (1 = male mated, 0 = male did not mate)
- “SizeFemMatedCAT” = for males that did mate, the size of the female mated. This is coded as a categorical variable (“L” = large, “S” = small) for the courtship threshold to mate analysis. If blank, the male did not mate.
- “SizeFemMatedBIN” = for males that did mate, the size of the female mated. This is coded as a binary variable (1 = large, 0 = small) for the size of female mated analysis. If blank, the male did not mate.
- “CourtshipThreshold” = courtship threshold data. If blank, the male did not mate.
MatingDuration.csv
Mating duration data from the Male Mate Choice Trials. Data are displayed in Figure 3b.
- “Block” = experimental block (“B1” = Block 1, “B2” = Block 2)
- “Set” = first or second set of observations that occurred within each block (“S1” = Set 1, “S2” = Set 2)
- “Observer” = observer who collected the courtship data
- “Male Size” = size of the male (“L” = large, “S” = small)
- “Female Size” = size of the female mated (“L” = large, “S” = small), if blank the male did not mate.
- “Mating Duration” = mating duration data in minutes. If blank the male did not mate.
FemaleFecundity.csv
Fecundity data from the Female Fecundity Experiment. Data are displayed in Figure 4.
- “MaleSize” = size of the male the female mated with (“L” = large, “S” = small)
- “FemaleSize” = size of the female (“L” = large, “S” = small)
- “Fecundity” = total number of offspring produced by the female. If blank, no fecundity data was recorded (either the male did not mate or the female died/was lost).
FemaleRemating.csv
Female remating data from the Female Remating Experiment. Data for small females are displayed in Figure 5b.
- “Male Size” = size of the experimental male that the female mated with first (“L” = large, “S” = small)
- “Female Size” = size of the female (“L” = large, “S” = small)
- “Remate?” = whether or not the female remated with the competitor male (“Y” = yes, “N” = no)
LFRematingP1.csv
P1 data for the large females that remated during the Female Remating Experiment. Data are displayed in Figure 5a.
- “MaleSize” = size of the experimental male that the female mated with first (“L” = large, “S” = small)
- “Female Size” = size of the female (“L” = large, “S” = small)
- “OLRE” = an observation-level random effect added to reduce overdispersion
- “RedOff” = the number of red-eyed offspring the female produced (i.e., offspring sired by the experimental male that mated the female first)
- “BwOff” = the number of brown-eyed offspring the female produced (i.e., offspring sired by the bw competitor male that mated the female second)
Sharing/Access information
Links to other publicly accessible locations of the data:
- N/A
Data was derived from the following sources:
- N/A
Code/Software
JMP logs for mating duration analysis
All analysis performed using JMP 17.
CourtshipEffortJMPlog.rtf
Output log containing the JMP script for the ANOVA used to analyze the courtship effort data in CourtshipEffort.csv
PreferenceIndexJMPlogs.rtf
Output logs containing the JMP scripts for the following analyses using the preference index data in PreferenceIndex.csv:
i) the Wilcoxon/Kruskal-Wallis tests testing for an effect of Observer and Block on preference index (PI)
ii) the Wilcoxon tests testing for an effect of observation Set within Block on PI
iii) the 1-way Wilcoxon tests testing whether PIs are significantly different from 0 for large and small males
iv) The Kruskal-Wallis test comparing PIs between large and small males
MatingDurationJMPlog.rtf
Output log containing the JMP script for the ANOVA used to analyze the mating duration data in MatingDuration.csv
FemaleRematingJMPlogs.rtf
Output logs containing the JMP scripts for the following analyses using the remating data in FemaleRemating.csv:
i) the Pearson’s Chi Square test comparing remating rates for large and small female
ii) the Pearson’s Chi Square test comparing remating rates for small females that mated with a large or small male first
R scripts for GLMs/GLMMs used to analyze mating success, size of female mated, courtship threshold to mate, fecundity, and P1 data
All analyses performed using R 4.2.2 and the following packages:
glmmTMB 1.1.5
Car 3.1-2
MatingData.R
R code for the following analyses:
- the binomial GLM used to analyze mating success data in MatingData.csv
- the binomial GLM used to analyze the data recording the size of the female mated in MatingData.csv
- the negative binomial GLMM used to analyze the courtship threshold to mate data in MatingData.csv
FemaleFecundity.R
R code for the negative binomial GML used to analyze the fecundity data in FemaleFecundity.csv
LFRematingP1.R
R code for the binomial GLMM used to analyze P1 data in LFRematingP1.csv
- Lev, Avigayil; Pischedda, Alison (2023). Male size does not affect the strength of male mate choice for high-quality females in Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.14206
