Skip to main content
Dryad

Data from: Sexual size dimorphism as a determinant of fighting performance dimorphism in Anolis lizards

Toyama, Ken1; Herrel, Anthony2; Mahler, Luke1

Published Nov 21, 2024 on Dryad. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.bcc2fqzpc

Data files

Nov 21, 2024 version files 94.09 KB

Click names to download individual files

Abstract

Rensch’s Rule describes a pattern of interspecific allometry in which sexual size dimorphism (SSD) increases with size among closely related species (i.e., among a group of related species, the largest ones tend to show more male-biased SSD). Sexual selection is often invoked to explain Rensch’s Rule, as larger male sizes are assumed to be favoured by sexual selection due to increased competitive ability they confer. Often the correlation between size and the trait under sexual selection is not well described. For example, a link between size and male fighting performance is often assumed, but rarely measured in studies of Rensch’s Rule. We studied a sexually selected performance trait, bite force in Anolis lizards, to determine whether patterns of SSD are linked to the allometry of performance dimorphism at the macroevolutionary level. Additionally, we tested whether allometric patterns of performance dimorphism differ between mainland and island species, as the latter have likely evolved under a stronger sexual selection regime. We found that SSD overwhelmingly explains the relationship between performance dimorphism and size in anoles, as expected under a sexual selection model for Rensch's Rule. However, the average value of performance dimorphism was higher in island than in mainland species, suggesting that these groups differ in performance dimorphism for reasons unrelated to size. Head size dimorphism was associated with residual performance dimorphism across all anoles, but did not fully explain the difference in performance dimorphism between island and mainland species. Together, these findings highlight the need to interpret Rensch’s Rule patterns of body size evolution cautiously, as allometric patterns of performance dimorphism and size dimorphism might not be equivalent.