Refuge abandonment in a formerly harvested waterbird and the consequent formation of multi-species bird colonies
Data files
Sep 15, 2025 version files 88.12 KB
-
DRYAD-DATABASE.xls
33.79 KB
-
README.md
6.68 KB
-
S3A.xlsx
9.91 KB
-
S3B.xlsx
9.50 KB
-
S3C.xlsx
9.35 KB
-
TableS1(FigA_B).xlsx
9.91 KB
-
TableS2(Fig2).xlsx
8.97 KB
Abstract
The intense human persecution of wildlife in the past forced many animal populations to look for refuge in human-inaccessible habitats. With the decline of direct persecution and the changes in the attitude of modern urban societies towards wildlife during the last few decades, an ecological process of abandonment of refuge habitats has become pervasive, and many species make habitat choices deemed surprising presently, such as colonizing sites that are more accessible to humans. We tested this process in the Yellow-legged Gull (Larus michahellis) by analysing long-term time series (1976-2022) of breeding pairs in 7 colonies in southern Europe. Overall, Yellow-legged Gull numbers showed a strong pattern of decrease during the study period, due to the recent closure of open-air garbage dumps. However, while the number of pairs in colonies located in human-inaccessible sites (islets with cliffs) declined rapidly, new colonization, together with a monotonic linear population growth, was detected in human-accessible sites, coinciding in time with the departure from refuges. Moreover, we found that the new small Yellow-legged Gull colonies acted as cores for the formation of multispecies waterbird colonies, likely by heterospecific attraction, which provides an added unexpected conservation value to Yellow-legged Gulls, traditionally considered a pest species. To support this refuge abandonment idea, we used GAMS to represent the evolution of breeding pairs of Yellow-legged Gull colonies in inaccessible (Figure 1A), accessible (Figure 1B), and the city of Vigo (Figure 1C) locations. To support the idea that Yellow-legged Gulls act as attractors for other breeding sites, we have used GAMS to represent the evolution of breeding pairs of three seabird species (Haematopus ostralegus, Egretta garceta, and Larus marinus) and, in addition, we have graphically represented the pattern observed in the studied colonies.
Dataset DOI: 10.5061/dryad.brv15dvn3
Description of the data and file structure
All supplementary material data used in this article has been uploaded. The submitted data represent long-term monitoring of breeding pairs of Yellow-legged Gulls (Larus michahellis) in different locations, which have been classified into two types (accessible and non-accessible) according to the accessibility capacity of humans (vertical rocky islets vs. sandy islets with flat dunes or flat islets). To graphically visualize the data and study non-linear relationships, we have used GAMs. Tables S1 and S2 were used for graph construction, and the statistical software R (https://www.r-project.org/) was used.
DRYAD-DATABASE.xls content: All data used in this study are divided into pages. These are annual monitoring results, where the numbers represent breeding pairs of the indicated species.
TableS1(FigA_B).xlsx: Contains data on breeding pairs of Yellow-legged Gulls at different locations. These locations are classified as accessible and inaccessible and are used separately to obtain population trends in accessible locations and inaccessible locations using GAMS.
TableS2(Fig2).xlsx: Contains data on breeding pairs of Yellow-legged Gulls in the city of Vigo. The first row indicates the years in which the sampling was carried out.
S3A.xlsx: Contains data on breeding pairs of Yellow-legged Gulls and Great Black-backed Gulls (Laurs marinus) at the indicated locations. The first row indicates the years in which the sampling was carried out.
S3B.xlsx: Contains data on breeding pairs of Yellow-legged Gulls and Eurasian Oystercatchers (Haematopus ostralegus) at the indicated locations. The first row indicates the years in which the sampling was carried out.
S3C.xlsx: Contains data on breeding pairs of Yellow-legged Gulls and egrets (Egretta garcetta) at the indicated locations. The first row indicates the years in which sampling was carried out.
We confirm that the uploaded data contains all the necessary information to replicate the results. The same conclusions can be reached with the data in the tables.
We are talking about qualitative conclusions without underlying statistical analysis. The graphs presented in the paper can be drawn with the shared data. This is explained in the material and methods section of the article.
Regarding the explanation of the variables, they represent the monitoring of breeding pairs of Yellow-legged Gulls in different locations indicated in the table (Tables 1 and 2). Table 3 represents the same: the monitoring of breeding pairs of different bird species. The first row represents the year in which the count was conducted, and the first column indicates the locations.
The last table (Table 4) was not used in the analyses. It has been added at the request of the editors to increase the information on the locations used in this work.
Empty cells without data have been indicated with an n/a, representing that there is no data for that year.
The data have the potential for long-term monitoring that may lead to various population comparisons elsewhere, population dynamics studies, or conservation actions for other authors.
Access information
Other publicly accessible locations of the data:
Data was derived from the following sources:
Data Larus michahellis:
Cíes 1977: Bárcena 1977
Cíes-Ons-Vionta 1976-1981: Barcena et al., 1987
Cies-Ons 1986: Callejo et al., 1986
Vionta 1990: Munilla, 1997
Cíes-Ons-Vionta 1991: Munilla et al, 1991
Cíes-Ons 1996: Arcea 1996
Cíes-Ons-Vionta-Guidoiros-Beiró 2001: Arcea 2001
Cíes-Ons-Vionta 2006: Arcea 2007
Pedregoso-Vionta 1991-1996: Fernández de la Cigoña & Oujo, 1999
Vigo 1989: Mouriño et al., 1999 (Chioglossa)
Vigo 1992-2013: Arcea, 2013
Pedregoso 2006: unpublished data
Areoso 2007,2016, and 2021: unpublished data
Data Larus marinus: unpublished data - (Xurxo Mouriño)
Data Haematopus ostralegus**:** unpublished data - (Xurxo Mouriño. (Own data provided by the Xunta de Galicia (regional government))
Datas Egretta garzetta**:** unpublished data - (Xurxo Mouriño) (Pedregoso 2022), unpublished data Miguel Lorenzo (*L.michahellis in *Beiró, excepto 2001 e 2022)
References
Arcea 1996. Censo das poboacións de Gaivota Común nidificantes nas illas Cíes e Illas Ons. Servicio Provincial de M.A.N. de Pontevedra, Xunta de Galicia. Informe non publicado.
Arcea 2001. Censo de gaivotas no ámbito do Parque das Illas Atlánticas e provincia de Pontevedra. Servicio Provincial de M.A.N. de Pontevedra, Xunta de Galicia. Informe non publicado.
Arcea 2007. Censo de colonias nidificantes de gaivota patiamarela (Larus michahellis) no Parque Nacional marítimo-terrestre Illas Atlánticas de Galicia. Ano 2006. Organismo Autónomo Parques Nacionales. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente. Informe no publicado.
Arcea 2013. *Censo das colonias nidificantes de gaivota patiamarela *(Larus michahellis) na cidade de Vigo, ano 2013. Estudo temporal da súa evolución e revisión da súa incidencia sanitaria. Concello de Vigo. Informe no publicado
Bárcena F. 1977. Colonias de aves marinas en las islas Cíes. Naturalia hispanica 9. ICONA, Madrid.
Bárcena F., de Souza J.A., Fernández E. & Domínguez J. 1987. Las colonias de aves marinas de la costa occidental de Galicia. Características, censo y evolución de sus poblaciones. Ecología 1: 187-209.
Callejo A., de la Torre F.G., Guitián J., López B., Guitián P. & Bermejo T. 1986. Contribución al conocimiento faunístico de las islas Cíes y Ons. Servicio de M.A.N. de Pontevedra, Xunta de Galicia. Informe non publicado.
Fernández de la Cigoña E. & Oujo J.M. 1999. Fauna das augas galegas: crustáceos, peixes, réptiles, aves e mamíferos. Instituto Galego de Estudos Mariños. Vigo
Mouriño J., Sierra-Abraín F. & Arcos F. 1999. Nidificación urbana de Gaviota Patiamarilla (Larus cachinnans) en Vigo (Galicia). Chioglossa 1: 47-52.
Munilla, I. 1997. *Estudio de la población y la ecología trófica de la Gaviota Patiamarilla en Galicia. *Tese doutoral. Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.
Munilla I., Mouriño J., Alonso P & López B. 1991. Censo de Gaviota Patiamarilla (Larus cachinnans) en las Islas Cíes. Servicio Provincial de M.A.N. de Pontevedra, Xunta de Galicia. Informe non publicado.
