Photosynthetic induction and sunfleck responses of three shade-tolerant temperate saplings
Data files
Mar 06, 2025 version files 3.32 MB
-
Hemispherical_photograph_data_2020.xlsx
9.92 KB
-
Induction_trace_data_2020.csv
932.82 KB
-
Leaf_data_2020.csv
4.15 KB
-
README.md
8.94 KB
-
Sunfleck_30s_trace_data_2020.csv
1.09 MB
-
Sunfleck_60s_trace_data_2020.csv
1.27 MB
Abstract
Novel understory tree species composition has arisen throughout forests of the eastern U.S. as various, often human-caused, pressures have led to regeneration mismatch between trees in the forest canopy and understory. Physiological attributes supporting the relative success of these novel understory tree communities are poorly characterized. We sought to examine photosynthetic induction and sunfleck responses in three shade-tolerant understory tree species now common in the U.S.’s Mid-Atlantic region. Focal species included the non-native Acer platanoides, as well as the natives Acer rubrum and Fagus grandifolia. Three experiments were performed on three individuals of each species at three independent study sites in the broadleaf forests of southeastern Pennsylvania, USA. The experiments were: (1) a photosynthetic induction experiment where uninduced leaves were first exposed to low light, followed by saturating light and measured until photosynthesis and stomatal conductance stabilized, (2) 30 second sunfleck experiments in which uninduced leaves were exposed to low light followed by a series of five 30 second saturating sunflecks, with two minutes of low light provided between each sunfleck, (3) 60 second sunfleck experiments in which uninduced leaves were exposed to low light followed by a series of five 60 second saturating sunflecks, with two minutes of low light provided between each sunfleck. Findings show fairly similar and rapid photosynthetic induction responses among species, consistent with expectations for shade-tolerant tree species. However, we observed a divergence in responses to applied sunflecks, where the two Acer species became induced more quickly than F. grandifolia and exhibited higher cumulative carbon assimilation when compared to conditions of constant saturating light. This suggests the Acer species are well positioned to persist in the variable light environments of the forest understory.
- Title of Dataset: Photosynthetic induction and sunfleck responses of three shade-tolerant temperate saplings
- Author Information
A. Principal Investigator Contact Information
Name: Jessica L. Schedlbauer
Institution: West Chester University of Pennsylvania
Address: Department of Biology, 730 S. Church St., West Chester, PA 19383, USA
Email: jschedlbauer@wcupa.edu - Date of data collection: 2020-06-29 through 2020-07-28
- Geographic location of data collection: Four sites in Chester County, PA, USA (Binky Lee Preserve (BLP): 40°05'42" N, 75°36'00" W; Gordon Natural Area (GNA): 39°56'08" N, 75°35'55" W; Mount Bradford Preserve (MBP): 39°56'33" N, 75°37'26" W, Miller Farm (MF): 40°01'54" N, 75°43'29" W)
- Information about funding sources that supported the collection of the data: West Chester Univerisity's Department of Biology
SHARING/ACCESS INFORMATION
- Links to publications that cite or use the data: Schedlbauer, J.L. and S. Paynter. In review. Photosynthetic induction and sunfleck responses of three understory tree species in forests of the Mid-Atlantic U.S. Trees: Structure and Function (link will be added, pending article acceptance)
- Recommended citation for this dataset: Schedlbauer, J.L. 2024. Photosynthetic induction and sunfleck responses of three shade-tolerant temperate saplings. (link will be added when available)
DATA & FILE OVERVIEW
- File List:
- Hemispherical_photograph_data_2020.csv - file includes global site factor and percent canopy cover data for each tree used in the study
- Leaf_data_2020.csv - file includes all measurements of leaf properties for each of the three experiments
- Induction_trace_data_2020.csv - file includes all measurements of photosynthetic induction responses during exposure to constant saturating light
- Sunfleck_30s_trace_data_2020.csv - file includes all measurements of leaf photosynthetic responses during exposure to artifically applied 30 second sunflecks
- Sunfleck_60s_trace_data_2020.csv - file includes all measurements of leaf photosynthetic responses during exposure to artifically applied 60 second sunflecks
- Relationship between files: All measurements were made at the same study sites in 2020.
- Date of file creation: 2024-09-02
METHODOLOGICAL INFORMATION
- Description of methods used for collection/generation of data: See Schedlbauer and Paynter (In press) for detailed methodological information. In brief: Three experiments were performed on three individuals of three tree species at each of three different study sites. The experiments were (1) a photosynthetic induction experiment where uninduced leaves were first exposed to low light, followed by saturating light and measured until photosynthesis and stomatal conductance stabilized, (2) 30 second sunfleck experiments in which uninduced leaves were exposed to low light followed by a series of five 30 second saturating sunflecks, where 2 minutes of low light were provided between each sunfleck, (3) 60 second sunfleck experiments in which uninduced leaves were exposed to low light followed by a series of five 60 second saturating sunflecks, where 2 minutes of low light were provided between each sunfleck. Unique leaves were measured for each experiment and collected after measurment to determine leaf mass per unit area and leaf nitrogen content. Understory light conditions experienced by each tree were also measured via hemispherical photography.
- Methods for processing the data: See the manuscript referenced above for details.
DATA-SPECIFIC INFORMATION FOR: Hemispherical_photograph_data_2020.csv
- Number of variables: 5
- Number of cases/rows: 27
- Variable List:
- Site: Study site codes where BLP = Binky Lee Preserve, GNA = Gordon Natural Area, MBP = Mount Bradford Preserve, MF = Miller Farm
- Species: Tree species codes where AB = American beech, NM = Norway maple, RM = red maple
- Tree ID: unique identifier for each tree measured in the study
- Global site factor: proportion of global radiation (direct plus diffuse radiation) reaching a given location, relative to a site with no obstructions
- Percent canopy cover: calculated percent canopy cover, measured on the south side of each tree ~1 m from the edge of the tree's canopy and 1.5 m above the soil surface
DATA-SPECIFIC INFORMATION FOR: Leaf_data_2020.csv
- Number of variables: 7
- Number of cases/rows: 82
- Variable List:
- Experiment type: individual leaves from each tree were measured for each of the study's three experiments: Ind = induction experiment, SF30 = 30 second sunfleck experiment, SF60 = 60 second sunfleck experiment
- Site: Study site codes where BLP = Binky Lee Preserve, GNA = Gordon Natural Area, MBP = Mount Bradford Preserve, MF = Miller Farm
- Species: Tree species codes where AB = American beech, NM = Norway maple, RM = red maple
- Tree ID: unique identifier for each tree measured in the study
- LMA g/m2 (g/m2): grams of dry leaf mass per square meter of fresh leaf area
- Percent nitrogen: percent nitrogen in each leaf, determined via elemental analysis
- Narea g/m2 (g/m2): grams of nitrogen per square meter of fresh leaf area
DATA-SPECIFIC INFORMATION FOR: Induction_trace_data_2020.csv
- Number of variables: 11
- Number of cases/rows: 10,258
- Variable List:
- Site: Study site codes where BLP = Binky Lee Preserve, GNA = Gordon Natural Area, MBP = Mount Bradford Preserve, MF = Miller Farm
- Species: Tree species codes where AB = American beech, NM = Norway maple, RM = red maple
- Tree ID: unique identifier for each tree measured in the study
- Time elapsed (s): seconds elapsed after each induction experiment was initiated on an individual leaf
- Photosynthesis (µmol CO2/m2/s): photosynthetic rate Ci (µmol CO2/mol air): leaf intercellular CO2 concentration
- Stomatal conductance to water vapor (mol H2O/m2/s): rate of stomatal conductance to water vapor
- Stomatal conductance to CO2 (µmol CO2/m2/s): rate of stomatal conductance to CO2
- Tleaf (degrees C): leaf temperature
- VPD (kPa): leaf-to-air vapor pressure deficit
- PAR (µmol photons/m2/s): applied photosynthetically active radiation
- Missing data: Lines of data are missing from this file (blank) when the LI-6800 infrared analyzer indicated the presence of (1) a leak in the system, or when (2) the instrument recorded physically impossible Ci values. Also note, while data for Tree ID = 4 are included in this data file, they were excluded from the analysis presented in the published paper, as described therein.
DATA-SPECIFIC INFORMATION FOR: Sunfleck_30s_trace_data_2020.csv
- Number of variables: 11
- Number of cases/rows: 11,772
- Variable List:
- Site: Study site codes where BLP = Binky Lee Preserve, GNA = Gordon Natural Area, MBP = Mount Bradford Preserve, MF = Miller Farm
- Species: Tree species codes where AB = American beech, NM = Norway maple, RM = red maple
- Tree ID: unique identifier for each tree measured in the study
- Time elapsed (s): seconds elapsed after each sunfleck experiment was initiated on an individual leaf
- Photosynthesis (µmol CO2/m2/s): photosynthetic rate
- Ci (µmol CO2/mol air): leaf intercellular CO2 concentration
- Stomatal conductance to water vapor (mol H2O/m2/s): rate of stomatal conductance to water vapor
- Stomatal conductance to CO2 (µmol CO2/m2/s): rate of stomatal conductance to CO2
- Tleaf (degrees C): leaf temperature
- VPD (kPa): leaf-to-air vapor pressure deficit
- PAR (µmol photons/m2/s): applied photosynthetically active radiation
DATA-SPECIFIC INFORMATION FOR: Sunfleck_60s_trace_data_2020.csv
- Number of variables: 11
- Number of cases/rows: 13,799
- Variable List:
- Site: Study site codes where BLP = Binky Lee Preserve, GNA = Gordon Natural Area, MBP = Mount Bradford Preserve, MF = Miller Farm
- Species: Tree species codes where AB = American beech, NM = Norway maple, RM = red maple
- Tree ID: unique identifier for each tree measured in the study
- Time elapsed (s): seconds elapsed after each sunfleck experiment was initiated on an individual leaf
- Photosynthesis (µmol CO2/m2/s): photosynthetic rate
- Ci (µmol CO2/mol air): leaf intercellular CO2 concentration
- Stomatal conductance to water vapor (mol H2O/m2/s): rate of stomatal conductance to water vapor
- Stomatal conductance to CO2 (µmol CO2/m2/s): rate of stomatal conductance to CO2
- Tleaf (degrees C): leaf temperature
- VPD (kPa): leaf-to-air vapor pressure deficit
- PAR (µmol photons/m2/s): applied photosynthetically active radiation
A full description of the research methods is available in the associated published manuscript. Three understory tree species, Acer platanoides (Norway maple), Acer rubrum (red maple), and Fagus grandifolia (American beech) were the focus of this study. Three saplings per species at three southeastern Pennsylvania broadleaf forest study sites were measured. Experiments were performed on different individual leaves per tree: (1) The first experiment was designed to measure the process of photosynthetic induction when leaves were uninduced (i.e., covered in light-blocking nylon bags), then exposed to low light (10 µmol m-2 s-1) followed by saturating light (1000 µmol m-2 s-1). (2) Thirty second sunfleck experiments were also performed, in which uninduced leaves were exposed to low light followed by a series of five 30 second saturating sunflecks, with two minutes of low light provided between each sunfleck. (3) Finally, a 60 second sunfleck experiments was carried out, in which uninduced leaves were exposed to low light followed by a series of five 60 second saturating sunflecks, with two minutes of low light provided between each sunfleck. Nine different attached leaves per species, spread evenly across three study sites were measured in each experiment. In each experiment, leaves were measured with the LI-6800 infrared gas analyzer (LI-COR, Lincoln, NE), and measurements of photosynthesis, as well as stomatal conductance were recorded. All leaves were collected following completion of measurements, scanned to determine fresh leaf area, dried to determine leaf dry mass, and analyzed to determine percent leaf nitrogen content. In addition to leaf-level measurements, hemispherical photographs were taken adjacent to each sapling measured to determine global site factor (GSF) and percent canopy cover experienced by each study tree.
