High-Ti melts from the Taurus-Littrow Valley (TLV). A product of volcanism or impact? An ANGSA investigation using the station 3 double drive tube 73001/73002
Data files
May 13, 2025 version files 20.89 KB
-
Mineral_analyses_Version_for_DRYAD_FINAL.xlsx
18.33 KB
-
README.md
2.56 KB
Abstract
The ANGSA initiative examined an unopened Apollo 17 double drive tube that penetrated a “light mantle” surface feature that represents a landslide deposit originating from the South Massif in the Taurus Littrow Valley. Within this double drive tube are several lunar lithologies not identified in the Apollo, Luna, Chang’e 5 or lunar meteorite collections. One such lithology is lithic fragment 73002,27G. It consists of a fine-grained, high-Ti melt lithology which hosts lithic clasts and mineral fragments derived from a variety of high-Ti basalts. This lithology represents either a quickly cooled mare basalt with xenocrysts produced by thermal erosion of older crystalline high-Ti basalts, or a high-Ti impact melt with remnants of the target lithologies. Both types of lithologies are rare to non-existent, so this new sample has the potential to shed light on either the dynamical near-surface interactions between erupting magmas and previously erupted flows, or impact processes involving high-Ti mare basalt targets.
Although not entirely unambiguous, numerous lines of evidence support an impact origin for this rock type. Based on crystal size distribution, the interclast melt experienced rapid cooling, exceeding rates documented in most high-Ti mare basalts. Mineral and bulk chemistry and preferred orientations of matrix grains indicate that the rapidly-cooled portion of this lithology contains remnants of a variety of mare basalts. It seems unlikely that basalt flow would contain such a variety of xenoliths at its chilled surface. Although the interclast melt falls on an appropriate liquid-line-of-descent, its composition has characteristics distinct from other high-Ti basalts.
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.dr7sqvb63
XCT Video of lithic fragment 73002,27G
Mineral data are presented as an Excel file.
Description of the data and file structure
Mineral data are individual electron microprobe spot analyses of mineral grains. Lithology represents different rock units in the thin section. These units are described in the manuscript. Sample refers to the Apollo double drive tube core collected during the Apollo 17 mission at Station 3 (73002). Mieral analyses refers to individual points on Olivine (Ol), pyroxene (Py), plagioclase (Plag), and ilmenite (Ilm). The oxide totals (SiO2, TiO2, Cr2O3.......) are presented in weight percent. For Olivine (Forsterite Fo, Fayalite Fa), Pyroxene (Enstatite En, Wollastonite Wo, Ferrosilite Fs), and Plagioclase (Albite Ab, Anorthite An, Orthoclase Or) the % of individual components are presented.
Sharing/Access information
Data was derived from the following sources:
- X-ray Computed Tomography (XCT) in the X-FaCT Lab at NASA JSC with a Nikon XTH 320 equipped with a 180 kV nano-focus transmission target source
- The thick section of 27G was examined, imaged, and analyzed by optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) at the University of New Mexico (UNM). Backscattered electron imaging and energy-dispersive analysis (both qualitative and quantitative) were accomplished with a TESCAN Lyra3 scanning electron microscope equipped with an IXRF silicon-drift energy-dispersive X-ray detector running Iridium Ultra software. Broad beam analyses were conducted with this SEM in 100 x 100 µm and 50 x 50 µm areas of two of the larger lithic clasts and the interclast regions to produce major and minor element analyses. CIPW norms, liquid density, liquid viscosity, and liquidus temperatures were calculated using a spreadsheet from K.T. Hollocher (2004; https://view.officeapps.live.com/op /view.aspx? src=https%3A%2F%2Fgeologynet.com%2Fprograms%2Fcipwnormexcel.xls&wdOrigin= BROWSELINK). Quantitative wavelength-dispersive analyses of individual minerals were obtained with a fully automated JEOL 8200 electron microprobe operated at 15kV with a focused beam, a beam current of 20 nA, calibrated with pure oxide and natural mineral standards (Simon et al., 2022).
A variety of lithic fragments were separated from the 73001 and 73002 cores during dissection and preliminary examination (PE). These curation activities were done in a nitrogen glove box at the Pristine Lunar Sample Laboratory Facility at the Johnson Space Center (JSC). In the first two passes of each core, the core was dissected in 0.5 cm sampling intervals, and each segment was sieved into <1 mm and >1 mm size fractions (Fig. 3a,b). The >1 mm lithic fragments were divided into 1-2 mm, 2-4 mm, and >4 mm size fractions (Fig. 3c). Individual >4 mm lithic fragments were triple-sealed in Teflon bags (Fig. 3d), removed from the nitrogen glove box, and scanned by X-ray Computed Tomography in the X-FaCT Lab at NASA JSC with a Nikon XTH 320 equipped with a 180 kV nano-focus transmission target source (Fig. 3e). See Gross et al. (2024) and Zeigler et al. (2024) (both in this special issue but not in the reference list) for detailed descriptions about the PE and XCT scanning, respectively, of 73001 and 73002. The sample identified by XCT imaging and considered in this study was lithic fragment 27G (Fig. 3f). Lithic fragment 27G was recovered from the 1.5-2.0 cm depth interval from the top of drive tube 73002. Its initial sample mass was 0.035g. An XCT video of this lithic fragment is available (presented in supporting information). The XCT data of 27G were used to guide the preparation of a thick section (73002,480) at Johnson Space Center that specifically exposed the two largest high-Ti clasts. Mineral data collected by SEM and EMPA is also available. This data was collected at the University of New Mexico SEM - EPMA lab.
- Shearer, C. K.; Simon, S. B.; Erickson, T. M. et al. (2025). High‐Ti Melts From the Taurus‐Littrow Valley (TLV). A Product of Volcanism or Impact? An ANGSA Investigation Using the Station 3 Double Drive Tube 73001/73002. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024je008437
