Data from: Chicks of cavity-nesting birds do not ‘exercise’ prior to fledging
Data files
Oct 30, 2025 version files 688.61 KB
-
Activity_2021_22_220925_revision.csv
8.21 KB
-
Activity_2021_22_220925_revision.R
3.38 KB
-
Activity_2023_220925_revision.csv
643.17 KB
-
Activity_2023_220925_revision.R
7 KB
-
Pooled_development_220925_revision.csv
11.54 KB
-
Pooled_development_220925_revision.R
8.40 KB
-
README.md
6.90 KB
Abstract
Fledging represents a key life-history transition involving a rapid increase in workload associated with a rapid transition from sedentary nestling to volant, active fledgling. Here, we tested the idea that chicks might prepare for fledging through increased voluntary activity (‘exercise’) and whether this would impact somatic and physiological development. European starling (Sturnus vulgaris) chicks, in cavity nests, increased levels of putative exercise (wing flapping) and more general active behaviours (e.g., perching, standing) in the five days up to fledging. However, facultative mass loss and wing growth between days 15 – 20 were independent of time spent wing flapping, standing, or perching, and – counterintuitively – we found a weak negative relationship between hematocrit (a measure of aerobic capacity) and time spent wing flapping or standing. Thus, although exercise is commonly associated with an increase in hematocrit in other species, this does not appear to be a mechanism for increasing pre-fledging hematocrit in chicks. Despite widespread anecdotal observations of flight preparation (e.g., wing flapping) in larger seabirds and raptors, our data suggest that exercise, or increased activity in general, does not contribute to improved development just prior to fledging: starling chicks do not ‘exercise’ enough to show somatic or physiological effects.
Dataset DOI: 10.5061/dryad.ffbg79d7m
Description of the data and file structure
Chicks of cavity-nesting birds do not ‘exercise’ prior to fledging
Kate Earle 1,2, Josh Allen 1,2, Brett Hodinka 1, and Tony D Williams 1
Note: Within spreadsheets, "." values indicate either missing data (e.g., when chicks fledged early, before day 20, so day 20 blood samples and measurements could not be obtained, indicated by “earlyf” column) or b) where data were not collected in all years, e.g. behavioural data on maintenance, perching, sitting, standing and walking were only collected in 2023. These missing data are detailed for specific variables below:
R code and data files
A1) Activity_2021_22_220925_revision.R – R code for analysis of activity*chick age using 2021/22 data
A2) Activity_2021_22_220925_revision.csv – data for Activity 2021_22 analysis
year Year of data collection
box Nest box number
chickid Chick ID
age Chick age (days)
extdur Duration of wing extensions (sec)
extbout Number of wing extension bouts
flapdur Duration of wing flapping (sec)
flapbout Number of wing flapping bouts
totdur Total duration of activity recording (min)
extdur60 Duration of wing extensions (sec) corrected to 60 min
extbout60 Number of wing extension bouts corrected to 60 min
flapdur60 Duration of wing flapping (sec) corrected to 60 min
flapbout60 Number of wing flapping bouts corrected to 60 min
A3) Activity_2023_220925_revision.R - R code for analysis of activity*chick age using 2023 data
A4) Activity_2023_220925_revision.csv – data for Activity_2023 analysis
date Date (day/mon/year)
time Time of day (hours:min)
viddur Duration of activity recording (hours:min:sec)
decdur Duration of activity recording as decimal
box Nest box number
chickid Chick ID
boxchick Combined code for box and chick
age Chick age (days)
state Type of activity: FL = flapping, M = maintenance, P = perching, SI = sitting, ST = standing, WA = walking
statest Start of activity
stateen End of activity
timesp Time spent in activity (sec)
statdur Time spent in activity (sec) as decimal
act Active or inactive behaviour (as described in MS)
bs Brood size or number of chicks
hct Hematocrit (PCV, %) – data missing for chicks that fledged early
hb Hemoglobin (g.dl -1 whole blood) – data missing for chicks that fledged early
adjdur Duration of activity (sec) corrected to 60 min
A5) Pooled_development_220925_revision.R – R code for analysis of year differences in mass loss and wing growth, activity with brood size and metrics or somatic and physiological development, pooling all years (where possible)
A6) Pooled_development_220925_revision.csv – data for pooled development analysis
year Year of data collection
box Nest box number
chickid Chick ID
bs Brood size or number of chicks
obsnum Number of observations
obsdur Duration of observations
earlyf Did chick fledge early (Y/N): some subsequent data NA if “Y”
ht15 Handling time: time from capture to blood sampling, day 15 (min)
ht20 Handling time: time from capture to blood sampling, day 20 (min)
mass15 Body mass (g) day 15
wing15 Wing length (mm) day 15
tars15 Tarsus length (mm) day 15
mass20 Body mass (g) day 20
wing20 Wing length (mm) day 20
tars20 Tarsus length (mm) day 20
hct Hematocrit (PCV, %) – data for 2023 and “earlyf = N” only
hb Hemoglobin (g.dl -1 whole blood) – data for 2023 and “earlyf = N” only
dmass Change in body mass (g) between days 15 and 20
dwing Change in wing length (mm) between days 15 and 20
xflapdur Mean duration wing flapping (sec)
xflapbout Mean number of flapping bouts – 2021/22 only
xextdur Mean duration of wing extensions (sec) = 2021/22 only
xextbout Mean number of wing extension bouts – 2021/22 only
xmaintain Mean duration, maintenance (sec) – 2023 only
xperch Mean duration, perching (sec) – 2023 only
xsit Mean duration, sitting (sec) – 2023 only
xstand Mean duration, standing (sec) – 2023 only
xwalk Mean duration, walking (sec) – 2023 only
20flap Time spent flapping (sec), day 20 only
20perch Time spent perching (sec), day 20 only
who Who led data collection
xage Mean age for days with activity recording
cumage Cumulative age for activity recording, e.g. if activity was recorded at ages 16, 17 and 18, then cumulative age = 51
