Interspecific aggression may shape species distributions through competitive exclusion, resulting in spatial segregation, or facilitate sympatry as an adaptive mechanism for resource partitioning. Competitive exclusion results from asymmetric aggression of one species towards another, but if the aggressive relationship between species is symmetric, they may persist in sympatry. Interspecific aggression is widely cited as a mechanism for maintaining the distributional limits of tropical birds, but how it shapes the spatial dynamics of competing species that are sympatric over larger geographic areas is less clear. To address this issue, we conducted reciprocal playback experiments on two congeneric Antbirds — Thamnophilus atrinucha and T. doliatus — that occur in sympatry across a habitat matrix in Colombia to characterize their relationship as symmetrically or asymmetrically aggressive and analyzed point count data to assess the degree to which they occur sympatrically. We found weak evidence for competitive exclusion, with the larger T. doliatus responding asymmetrically to T. atrinucha, and the two species having a low co-detection rate during point counts. However, in spite of their 22% difference in body size, T. atrinucha still responded to T. doliatus playback in over half of our trials, and the two species co-occurred on nearly 25% of point counts, indicating that interspecific aggression does not drive complete spatial segregation. Our findings highlight how the degree to which one species can competitively exclude another may vary, especially across a dynamic landscape.

Data collected by locating territorial individual pairs of focal species and conducting playback experiments as described in body of paper. The data has been processed by evaluating each individual behavioral response variable and a principle component analysis to summarize these behaviors using mixed effect models in R. R code for these analyses included here.