Data from: Indigenous versus exotic understorey plantings: Contrasting impacts on urban bee diversity
Data files
Oct 21, 2025 version files 13.49 KB
-
bee_species_plant_host_abundance_final.csv
7.13 KB
-
bee_species_site_abundance_site_type.csv
3.18 KB
-
README.md
1.62 KB
-
site_species_richness_final.csv
1.55 KB
Abstract
Urban environments pose a threat to biodiversity through processes such as habitat degradation and biotic homogenisation. Despite this, cities are increasingly recognised for their potential to conserve bees and other pollinators. Planting understorey vegetation is one way of providing more floral resources to support urban bee communities and the ecosystem services they provide. However, the influence of vegetation origin and landscape context on urban bee communities is unclear, particularly in the Southern Hemisphere. We sampled the bee communities at 32 understorey plantings dominated by exotic or indigenous (native to the local bioregion) vegetation around inner Melbourne, Australia. For each site, we recorded the amount of impervious surface and irrigated turf in 200 m buffers. Indigenous plantings were found to promote significantly greater alpha and beta diversity in bee communities compared to exotic plantings. Particular plant taxa were highly effective at attracting a variety of bees, with a maximum of 19 bee species (including specialists) hosted by indigenous Wahlenbergia capillaris (Campanulaceae). Apis mellifera was highly dominant and strongly associated with exotic plantings, whereas many indigenous bee species were positively associated with indigenous plantings. This study shows indigenous understorey plants have a positive influence on indigenous bee communities relative to exotic plantings which tend to attract only A. mellifera. Planting indigenous plants in cities is therefore recommended as a conservation action for local bee species.
Dataset DOI: 10.5061/dryad.fttdz091k
Description of the data and file structure
Supplementary data files for study “Indigenous versus exotic understorey plantings: contrasting impacts on urban bee diversity”, Burns et al. Contact Monique Burns (moniqueburns20@gmail.com) with any questions.
All files are in .csv format.
- bee_species_plant_host_abundance_final.csv: A matrix of bee (columns) and plant (rows) species observed interacting in this study. Numbers indicate the number of times a bee species was observed visiting the corresponding plant species. Used to develop a bee-plant interaction network.
- site_species_richness_final.csv: A table showing the number of bee and plant species identified at each surveyed site (beespp and plantspp, respectively), the area of the site (m2), the proportion of impervious surface and irrigated turf in 200 m buffers around each site (prop_impturf), the site type (indigenous plants or exotic plants) and the time spent surveying each site (mins). Used to calculate alpha diversity of surveyed sites while accounting for other variables.
- bee_species_site_abundance_site_type.csv: A table showing the number of observations made for each bee species (column 3-28) at each surveyed site, including the site type (indigenous plants or exotic plants). Used to calculate a Bray-Curtis dissimilarity matrix that could be analysed to determine beta diversity of surveyed sites.
- Burns, Monique; Williams, Nicholas S. G.; Brown, Julian (2025). Indigenous versus exotic understory plantings: Contrasting impacts on urban bee diversity. Ecological Applications. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.70159
