Data from: Impacts of management practices on habitat selection during juvenile mountain lion dispersal
Data files
Feb 08, 2025 version files 8.03 MB
-
F206_IWS.csv
167.23 KB
-
F286_IWS.csv
1.26 MB
-
M168_IWS.csv
902.37 KB
-
M176_IWS.csv
185.60 KB
-
M197_IWS.csv
60.62 KB
-
M198_IWS.csv
435.53 KB
-
M200_IWS.csv
735.19 KB
-
M202_IWS.csv
139.45 KB
-
M208_IWS.csv
462.08 KB
-
M280_IWS.csv
941.02 KB
-
M281_IWS.csv
1.08 MB
-
M282_IWS.csv
755.06 KB
-
M341_IWS.csv
895.89 KB
-
README.md
5.58 KB
Abstract
Dispersal is a complex series of movements before an individual establishes a home range. Animals must travel and forage in unfamiliar landscapes that include anthropogenic risks such as road crossings, harvest, and urban landscapes. We compare dispersal behavior of juvenile mountain lions (Puma concolor) from two geographically distinct populations in California and Nevada, USA. These two sites are ecologically similar but have different management practices; hunting is permitted in Nevada, whereas mountain lions are protected in California. We used GPS-collar data and net-squared displacement analysis to identify three dispersal states: exploratory, departure, and transient home range. We then compared each dispersal state of the two mountain lion populations using an integrated step selection analysis (iSSA). The model included explanatory variables hypothesized to influence one or more dispersal states, including distance to forest, shrub, water, hay and crop, developed lands, four-wheel drive roads, elevation, and terrain ruggedness. Results revealed consistent habitat selection between sites across most landscape variables, with one notable exception: anthropogenic covariates, including distance to developed land, distance to hay and crop, and distance to four-wheeled drive roads, were only statistically significant on modeled habitat selection during dispersal in the population subject to hunting. Results indicate avoidance of anthropogenic landscapes in the hunted population, suggesting that hunting and non-lethal pursuit increases avoidance of anthropogenic landscapes during dispersal for juvenile mountain lions. Comparing populations provides valuable insights into the role of management in shaping dispersal behavior.
[https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.70097]
Processed and organized by John F. Randolph on 5/26/24 (Updated 11/15/24), other important contributors were Julie K. Young, David C. Stoner, and David K. Garcelon.
Data:
This is raw data from GPS collared juvenile mountain lions between the ages of 14-22 months in Modoc County California. All data was collected between 2016-2022. Each CSV file corresponds to an individual animal, with the file name representing the individual's identifier. All California mountain lion data was collected by the Institute for Wildlife Studies(IWS).
Data Files
F206_iws.csv - Female juvenile with ID 206
F286_iws.csv - Female juvenile with ID 286
M168_iws.csv - Male juvenile with ID 168
M176_iws.csv - Male juvenile with ID 176
M197_iws.csv - Male juvenile with ID 197
M198_iws.csv - Male juvenile with ID 198
M200_iws.csv - Male juvenile with ID 200
M202_iws.csv - Male juvenile with ID 202
M208_iws.csv - Male juvenile with ID 208
M280_iws.csv - Male juvenile with ID 280
M281_iws.csv - Male juvenile with ID 281
M282_iws.csv - Male juvenile with ID 282
M341_iws.csv - Male juvenile with ID 341
*Due to the use of different collar companies (Vectronic, Lotek, and Sirtrack), the column names do not all match but are similar. Descriptions of column names can be found below. The provided code will edit the column names and make them all the same
The Nevada data and code is not provided because Nevada mountain lions are a protected game species under Nevada Administrative Code (NAC) 502.370).
As such, raw location data of mountain lions are considered proprietary and cannot be released without written permission from the Nevada Department of Wildlife. Data inquiries can be addressed to Patrick Jackson at [pjackson@ndow.org].
Column names and descriptions by collar companies
Lotek and Sirtrack Collars
Collarid: Collar / Animal ID
Device: Collar serial number
animal: Animal ID
Lion&Collar: Lion ID and collar serial number
GMT: Greenwich Mean Time
Localtime: Local time for Northeastern California (Pacific)
Year: Year point was taken
Month: Month point was taken
Day: Day point was taken
Hour: Hour point was taken
Minute: Minute point was taken
Second: Second point was taken
DOP: Dilution of precision (measurement of accuracy of GPS point)
Long: Longitudinal location
Lat: Latitudinal location
UTM-E: UTM easting location in zone 10
UTM-N: UTM northing location in Zone 10
Start: Day collared
End: Day collar dropped or mortality event
Days.after.start: how many days since collared
Days.before.end: how many days till collar dropped off of mortality
Vectronic Collars
No: Number of locations
CollarID: Collar / Animal ID
UTC_Date: UTC date
UTC_Time: UTC time
LMT_Date/Time: Local mean date and local mean time
Origin: Shows where the message originates from
SCTS_Date/Time: the date/time when the message receives the provider
ECEF X, Y, and Z: Coordinates in the Earth Centered Earth Fixed coordinate system
Latitude[°]: Latitudinal location
longitude[°]: longitudinal location
Height[m]: Elevation of location
DOP: Dilution of precision (measurement of accuracy of GPS point)
FixType: quality of fix obtained
3D_Error[m]: Difference(m) between real position and transmitted position
Sats: Number of satellites used for the fix
Sat: channels of the GPS receiver with two columns each containing the received satellite number and the carrier to noise ratio in dBHz
C/N: channels of the GPS receiver with two columns each containing the received satellite number and the carrier to noise ratio in dBHz
Mort.Status: Shows if animal is alive or dead
Activity: Value for internal usage only. Not connected to any kind of activity generated by the VERTEX Plus or GPS Plus collars
Main[V]: Voltage of the main battery
Beacon[V]: Voltage of the beacon battery
Temp[°C]: Ambient temperature
Easting: UTM easting location in zone 10
Northing: UTM northing location in Zone 10
AnimalID: Not Assigned
GroupID: Not Assigned
Collar user manual: [https://www.vectronic-aerospace.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Survey-Collar-Manual-V2.4.pdf]
Code:
All code was written in the program R (version 4.2.2) and is organized in steps from 1 to 11. Starting at 1, the processing and cleaning of raw data begins, and ending with 11, the model output and figures are generated.
Code Descriptions:
01Lion_Processing - Processing raw data to a clean version
02DataResampling - Resampling GPS data fix rates
03ClusterIdentifier - Identify killsite clusters
04ClusterRemoval - Remove identified killsite clusters
05NSD - Identifying different movement states of dispersal with Net-squared displacement
06Behavior&Sex_Columns - Adding a column for sex and a column for movement state
07Combining lions and behaviors - Combining all lions and behaviors into one data frame
08Covariate_correlation - Check correlation of covariates
09Extracting_Covariates - Create movement distributions for movement states and then extract covariates for each location
10ScalingCovariates - Scale and center covariates
11_IssaModel - Running integrated step selection analyses for both California and Nevada, followed by calculating a population average and generating plots to compare the results.
- Young, Julie; Randolph, John; Garcelon, David (2025). Data from: Impacts of management practices on habitat selection during juvenile mountain lion dispersal. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11373398
- Young, Julie; Randolph, John; Garcelon, David (2025). Data from: Impacts of management practices on habitat selection during juvenile mountain lion dispersal. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11373399
- Randolph, John F.; Young, Julie K.; Stoner, David C.; Garcelon, David K. (2024). Impacts of management practices on habitat selection during juvenile mountain lion dispersal. Ecology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.70097
