Finite element models presented from: Bite force production and the origin of Homo
Data files
Apr 18, 2025 version files 17.52 GB
-
Ledogar_et_al_2025_FEMs.zip
17.52 GB
-
README.md
2.66 KB
Abstract
The divergence of Homo from gracile australopiths has been described as a trend of decreasing dentognathic size and robusticity, precipitated by stone tool use and/or a shift to softer foods, including meat. Yet, mechanical evidence supporting this narrative is sparse, and isotopic and archaeological data have led to the suggestion that a shift away from a gracile australopith-like diet would not have occurred in the most basal members of Homo but rather only with the appearance of H. erectus, implying that the origin of our genus is not rooted in dietary change. Here, we provide mechanical evidence that H. habilis exhibits an australopith-like pattern of facial strain during biting but, unlike most australopiths, was not suited for a diet that required forceful processing by the molar teeth. H. habilis was at elevated risk of distractive jaw joint forces during those bites, constraining muscle recruitment so as to avoid generating uncomfortable/dangerous levels of tension in the joint. Modern humans have similar limitations. This suggests that selection on skeletal traits favouring forceful postcanine processing wereas relaxed by the earliest stages in the evolution of our genus, implying that dietary or food processing changes played an important role in the emergence of Homo. The divergence of Homo from gracile australopiths has been described as a trend of decreasing dentognathic size and robusticity, precipitated by stone tool use and/or a shift to softer foods, including meat. Yet, mechanical evidence supporting this narrative is sparse, and isotopic and archaeological data have led to the suggestion that a shift away from a gracile australopith-like diet would not have occurred in the most basal members of Homo but rather only with the appearance of H. erectus, implying that the origin of our genus is not rooted in dietary change. Here, we provide mechanical evidence that H. habilis exhibits an australopith-like pattern of facial strain during biting but, unlike most australopiths, was not suited for a diet that required forceful processing by the molar teeth. H. habilis was at elevated risk of distractive jaw joint forces during those bites, constraining muscle recruitment so as to avoid generating uncomfortable/dangerous levels of tension in the joint. Modern humans have similar limitations. This suggests that selection on skeletal traits favouring forceful postcanine processing wereas relaxed by the earliest stages in the evolution of our genus, implying that dietary or food processing changes played an important role in the emergence of Homo.
Dataset DOI: 10.5061/dryad.j0zpc86k6
Description of the data and file structure
README file accompanying the Finite Element Models presented in “BITE FORCE PRODUCTION AND THE ORIGIN OF HOMO” by Ledogar et al.
Cranial finite element models are provided for four fossil hominin specimens (KNM-ER 1813, AL 444-2, MH1, OH5, Sts 5), six specimens of Pan troglodytes (PC1-, PC1+, PC2-, PC2+, PC3-, PC3+), and seven specimens of modern Homo sapiens (BERG, GRGL, KSAN1, KSAN2, MALP, TIGA, WAFR).
Each of these 18 models has been subjected to two loading conditions, one simulating a maximal bite on the third premolar (P3), and one on the second molar (M2). For each bite case, we subjected each FEM to isometrically scaled muscle forces derived from a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) simulating a maximal bite (all muscles contracting at peak activity). FEMs of modern humans and Homo habilis were loaded a second time using isometrically scaled muscle forces derived from a modern human (Homo sapiens).
Files and variables
File: Ledogar_et_al_FEMs.zip
Description:
Two files have been uploaded for each loading condition. One file, in .st7 format, consists of the finite element model. The other file, in .LSA format, consists of the results corresponding that loading condition. These files open in Strand7 software. These files can be reformatted for conversion to other file types for use in other finite element analysis software.
The names of the files indicate the specimen, loading condition (P3 or M2 bite), muscle forces (chimpanzee or human), and file type. For example, KNM-ER 1813_P3_chimpanzee forces.st7 is the file containing the finite element model of specimen KNM-ER 1813 that simulates a bite on the P3 using isometrically scaled muscle forces derived from a chimpanzee. To view the results corresponding to this model, open the file in Strand7 software, open the results window and select KNM-ER 1813_P3_chimpanzee forces.LSA.
Additionally, we have provided models as NASTRAN files. These files preserve the geometry of the models and details on loading conditions. They do not preserve the material properties, which as described in our paper change as gradients throughout the model. Additionally, results (.LSA) files cannot be opened when using these files outside of Strand7. However, the models can be imported into non-proprietary software and analyzed by other researchers who don’t have access to Strand7.
Code/software
n/a
Access information
n/a
- Ledogar, Justin A.; Benazzi, Stefano; Smith, Amanda L. et al. (2025). Bite force production and the origin of Homo. Royal Society Open Science. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.241879
