Data from: Suppression of plant resistance may be a common trait among adapted herbivores
Data files
Feb 17, 2025 version files 55.06 KB
-
Figure_1D_E_F___Figure_2B_C_D.txt
37.08 KB
-
Figure1A_B___Figure_2A.txt
9.44 KB
-
Figure1C.txt
4.60 KB
-
README.md
3.93 KB
Abstract
Herbivores have evolved distinct strategies to cope with plant defences prior to becoming a pest. Some evolved resistance to toxic compounds, others suppress host toxin production. These traits seem to co-occur within herbivore species, particularly among spider mites, which are a priority pest in many crops. The intraspecific variation within the spider mites is a model for adaptive pest evolution on crops such as tomato. Empirical data collected from non-solanaceous wild host plants suggests that natural populations predominantly comprise individuals capable of inducing tomato defences, while a small proportion suppress these defences. Additionally, resistant individuals are observed only rarely within these populations. This study aims to investigate the presence of these traits within populations adapted to tomato plants. Here, Tetranychus urticae populations sampled from tomato at three field sites were compared. To discriminate between mites that induce/suppress defences and to assess their degree of resistance, the magnitude of induced defences was measured and aligned with oviposition data. The expression of effector 84 was also assessed, to determine if its magnitude of expression is a good predictor of suppression with the magnitude of suppression. Surprisingly we observed that that suppression is the dominant phenotype in mite populations collected from field-grown tomatoes. Our results suggest that suppression may be rare only at the beginning of an herbivore's adaptive trajectory after colonization of a novel host but may rapidly become common due to natural selection. This suggests the possibility that suppression potentially represent a prevalent phenotype among host-adapted herbivores and, consequently among pests.
Datasets are divided into Figures. For example, "Figure1A_B & Figure 2A.txt" comprises the data used for Figures 1A, 1 B, and 2A.
Description of the Data and file structure
For each data set the column's names will be detailed below.
For all the data sets, NA referees to missing data and:
- C stands for clean plants,
- I stands for plants infested with the benchmark inducer control
- S stands for plants infested with the benchmark suppressor control
- Tu_O for plants infested with the T. urticae outbred population
- DEF for plants infested with the T. urticae DEF population
- ALP for plants infested with the T. urticae ALP population
- MON for plants infested with the T. urticae MON population
"Figure1A_B & Figure 2A.txt"
- block - Experimental block
- qpcrtime - time point of experiment in which gene expression was measured (t4 - four days after first infestation; t6 - six days after first infestation)
- plant - plant number
- variety - Plant variety (CM = WT or def1= def-1)
- Pop - Control: control benchmarks (inducer, suppressor or clean plants); Te: Populations of the species T. evansi; Tu: Populations of the species T. urticae
- treatment - Mite population (T. urticae inducer benchmark, T. evansi suppressor benchmark, T. urticae outbred, ALP, DEF or MON)
- survfemales_1 - females that survived in the end of the first infestation (t4)
- totalfemales_1 - total number of females (alive and dead) in the end of the first infestation (t4)
- eggs_1 - eggs oviposited by the females of the first infestation
- survfemales_2 - females that survived in the end of the second infestation (t6)
- totalfemales_2 - total number of females (alive and dead) in the end of the second infestation (t6)
- eggs_2 - eggs oviposited by the females of the second infestation
- survmean_1 - average female survival; results from: survmean=(survfemales_1+totalfemales)/2
- eggsp - Eggs per female (Fecundity); results from: eggsp=(eggs_1/survmean_1)
- survmean_2 - average female survival; results from: survmean=(survfemales_2+3)/2
- eggsc - Eggs per female (Fecundity) of competitor; results from: (eggs_2/survmean_2)
"Figure1C.txt"
- block - Experimental block
- sample - plant number (equivalent to plant in "Figure1A_B & Figure 2A.txt")
- Pop - Control: control benchmarks (inducer, suppressor or clean plants); Te: Populations of the species T. evansi; Tu: Populations of the species T. urticae
- target - target gene (salivary effector 84 - eff84)
- treatment - Mite population (T. urticae inducer benchmark, T. evansi suppressor benchmark, T. urticae outbred, ALP, DEF or MON)
- mean - expression before normalization
- norm.exp - Normalized expression effectors
- scaled - Normalized expression effectors scaled to the minimum mean
"Figure 1D_E_F & Figure 2B_C_D.txt"
- block - Experimental block
- sample - plant number (equivalent to plant in "Figure1A_B & Figure 2A.txt")
- Pop - Control: control benchmarks (inducer, suppressor or clean plants); Te: Populations of the species T. evansi; Tu: Populations of the species T. urticae
- type - mix or mite, depending if the extraction was perform from a mix of plant and mites ou just from mites. In the paper, only the mix was considered.
- plant - plant number identifier
- gene - target gene (IIc - WIPII_IIc; IIf - WIPI-IIf; PR-1a)
- target - target gene (IIc - WIPII_IIc; IIf - WIPI-IIf; PR-1a)
- qpcrtime - time point of experiment in which gene expression was measured (t4 - four days after first infestation; t6 - six days after first infestation)
- treatment - Mite population (T. urticae inducer benchmark, T. evansi suppressor benchmark, T. urticae outbred, ALP, DEF or MON)
- mean - expression before normalization
- norm.exp - Normalized expression
- scaled - Normalized expression scaled to the minimum mean
