Skip to main content
Dryad

Data from: Individual-based networks reveal the importance of bee fly (Bombyliidae) pollination in a diverse co-flowering community

Data files

Oct 14, 2024 version files 49.41 KB
Oct 14, 2024 version files 49.38 KB

Click names to download individual files

Abstract

Co-flowering species are visited by a wide diversity of pollinating insects; however, the structure of individual foraging patterns for non-bee insect pollinators is not well-known even though this is central for the effectiveness of the pollination processes. Pollination by non-syrphid flies, such as bee flies (Bombyliidae, Diptera), has often been underappreciated. Bee flies represent a diverse group of long-tongue nectar-feeding insects that are often reported as generalists that visit flowers indiscriminately. Here, we used individual-based pollen transport networks to assess patterns of individual foraging in bee flies over two flowering seasons in a diverse co-flowering community. Thus, we determined the structure of individual foraging and specialization. We also quantified the abundance of floral resources over time and individual proboscis length and body size to evaluate the role of resource availability and intraspecific trait variation in shaping individual specialization. Although the bee fly population is generalist (20 plant species as resources), individuals partition their niche at the foraging-bout level reflected by a modular pattern of interactions, concentrating their foraging on a few floral resources (2-4 plant species). This indicates that individual foraging in bee flies is nonrandom and can ensure high specificity in pollen transfer among conspecifics in the community. This modular foraging pattern was persistent over the two sampled flowering seasons (2021-2022) and not explained by resource availability. Intraspecific variation in proboscis length, however, was related to the level of individual specialization. An increase in proboscis length was related to an expansion of individual niche, which can be related to broader access to plant species with different floral tube sizes. Furthermore, specialization varied between years as well as the plant composition within interaction modules. Our study suggests that individual foraging patterns can persist over time, although specialization levels and niche partitioning of available resources may be dynamic in response to individual phenotypic variation and other ecological factors.