Data from: Individual-based networks reveal the importance of bee fly (Bombyliidae) pollination in a diverse co-flowering community
Data files
Oct 14, 2024 version files 49.41 KB
-
dataset01_individual_pollen_loads.csv
3.80 KB
-
dataset02_resource_availability.csv
41.64 KB
-
README.md
3.97 KB
Oct 14, 2024 version files 49.38 KB
-
dataset01_individual_pollen_loads.csv
3.80 KB
-
dataset02_resource_availability.csv
41.64 KB
-
README.md
3.94 KB
Abstract
Co-flowering species are visited by a wide diversity of pollinating insects; however, the structure of individual foraging patterns for non-bee insect pollinators is not well-known even though this is central for the effectiveness of the pollination processes. Pollination by non-syrphid flies, such as bee flies (Bombyliidae, Diptera), has often been underappreciated. Bee flies represent a diverse group of long-tongue nectar-feeding insects that are often reported as generalists that visit flowers indiscriminately. Here, we used individual-based pollen transport networks to assess patterns of individual foraging in bee flies over two flowering seasons in a diverse co-flowering community. Thus, we determined the structure of individual foraging and specialization. We also quantified the abundance of floral resources over time and individual proboscis length and body size to evaluate the role of resource availability and intraspecific trait variation in shaping individual specialization. Although the bee fly population is generalist (20 plant species as resources), individuals partition their niche at the foraging-bout level reflected by a modular pattern of interactions, concentrating their foraging on a few floral resources (2-4 plant species). This indicates that individual foraging in bee flies is nonrandom and can ensure high specificity in pollen transfer among conspecifics in the community. This modular foraging pattern was persistent over the two sampled flowering seasons (2021-2022) and not explained by resource availability. Intraspecific variation in proboscis length, however, was related to the level of individual specialization. An increase in proboscis length was related to an expansion of individual niche, which can be related to broader access to plant species with different floral tube sizes. Furthermore, specialization varied between years as well as the plant composition within interaction modules. Our study suggests that individual foraging patterns can persist over time, although specialization levels and niche partitioning of available resources may be dynamic in response to individual phenotypic variation and other ecological factors.
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.qbzkh18sq
Description of the data and file structure
"dataset01" contains data from 53 individual bee flies (rows) collected in two years (2021 and 2022) in the serpentine seeps. Body size (length, mm) and proboscis length (mm) of each collected individual are provided. The number of pollen grains belonging to different plant species (species acronyms given as columns - 5 to 24 - see species list below) found on each individual pollen load is included. The pollen collected from each individual was directly counted on a single slide under a light microscope.
"dataset02" contains 1401 rows representing within-plot flower counts of the plant species found on individual bee fly pollen loads. Flower counts were conducted in different plots, days and years (see detail descriptions of the variables).
Files and variables
File: dataset01_individual_pollen_loads.csv
Description:
Variables
- Individual ID: ID code for each individual bee fly (n = 53).
- Year: Survey year (2021 or 2022).
- Body size: Body length, in millimeters, of each individual bee fly.
- Proboscis length: Proboscis length, in millimeters, of each individual bee fly.
- 5-24: Columns indicate the quantity of pollen grains of a specific plant species (represented by species code, see plant species names for the corresponding acronym below) within individual bee fly pollen loads.
File: dataset02_resource_availability.csv
Description:
Variables
- Year: Year of data collection (2021 and 2022).
- Plot ID: Id name for each plot used for flower counts across time.
- Date: Day of data collection
- Plant species code: Acronyms for each plant species found within bee fly pollen loads (total of 20 plant species, see list below).
- Number of flowers: Number of flowers of a specific plant species counted within the plots on a specific day and year.
List of plant species found within individual bee fly pollen loads and corresponding code (acronym) and family.
| Plant species acronym | Plant species | Family |
|---|---|---|
| ALAM | Allium amplectens | Amaryllidaceae |
| ALFI | Allium fimbriatum | Amaryllidaceae |
| ANAR | Anagallis arvensis | Primulaceae |
| ANCO | Antirrhinum cornutum | Plantaginaceae |
| ANVE | Antirrhinum vexillocalyculatum | Plantaginaceae |
| CAFO | Castilleja foliolosa | Orobanchaceae |
| CARU | Castilleja rubicundula | Orobanchaceae |
| CETR | Centaurium trichanthum | Gentianaceae |
| CLCO | Clarkia concinna | Onagraceae |
| CLGR | Clarkia gracilis | Onagraceae |
| DEUL | Delphinium uliginosum | Ranunculaceae |
| ERLA | Eriophyllum lanatum | Asteraceae |
| ESCA | Eschscholzia californica | Papaveraceae |
| LAMI | Lagophylla minor | Asteraceae |
| LIBI | Linanthus bicolor | Polemoniaceae |
| LIDI | Linanthus dichotomus | Polemoniaceae |
| MIGU | Mimulus guttatus | Phrymaceae |
| MIDO | Minuartia douglasii | Caryophyllaceae |
| PLST | Plagiobothrys stipitatus | Boraginaceae |
| ZIVE | Zigadenus venenosus | Melanthiaceae |
This dataset is part of the paper titled "Individual-based networks reveal the importance of bee fly (Bombyliidae) pollination in a diverse co-flowering community", considered for publication in the Journal of Applied Entomology. In this study, we used individual bee flies surveyed on a serpentine seep plant community, North California, during two flowering seasons (2021 and 2022) to assess individual specialization and the role of these neglected pollinators in the pollination process in this highly diverse co-flowering community. Individual bee flies were collected in the seeps by 2-3 people simultaneously by walking at a steady pace while observing all flowering species. Specimens were stored in tubes under freezing temperatures from collection to processing in the lab. Their pollen loads were collected from head, dorsal and ventral thorax using fuchsin jelly cubes that were later mounted on a single microscope slide. All pollen grains obtained from bee flies were counted under a microscope and identified based on pollen libraries previously established from anthers collected for each plant species at the study site. We also measured the proboscis and body length of each individual bee fly using a digital caliper (at the nearest 0.01 mm) after collecting their pollen loads. Finally, we provide data describing resource availability over time by quantifying the number of flowers per species across two flowering seasons (2021 and 2022). We set 1×2-meter plots along the seeps in both years totalizing 81 plots (40 plots in 2021 and 41 plots in 2022). Plant identity and number of open flowers per species were recorded within plots during sampling days (every two days within 21-day sampling in 2021 and 27-day sampling in 2022).
