Skip to main content
Dryad

Socio-economic status and non-native species drive bird ecosystem service provision in urban areas

Data files

Jul 04, 2025 version files 632.28 KB

Click names to download individual files

Abstract

Areas of higher socio-economic status within urban areas generally have higher levels of taxonomic diversity than poorer areas, representing a form of environmental injustice. This inequality may result in lower-income areas experiencing both lower cultural (e.g., non-material services provided by bird aesthetics) and regulating (e.g., pest control by insectivorous birds) ecosystem service provision. Furthermore, urban areas are hotspots for the introduction of non-native species, which can potentially alter the functional space of invaded communities, and hence their ecosystem service provision. However, the relationship between socio-economic status and the ecosystem services that both native and non-native urban biodiversity provide has yet to be fully addressed. We tested whether functional diversity associated with avian cultural and regulating ecosystem services varied along the socio-economic gradient of functional urban areas (FUAs) in the Iberian Peninsula. We used bird atlases from Spain and Portugal to characterise the bird communities of all FUAs across each country, calculating both species richness and functional dispersion of traits related to cultural and regulating ecosystem services. We then applied generalized linear mixed models to understand the relationships between these diversity metrics and the socio-economic status of each community, measured as annual median household income. Furthermore, we assessed whether the presence or absence of non-native species moderated community responses along the socio-economic gradient. Both cultural and regulating ecosystem services were negatively affected by socio-economic status, while species richness followed the opposite trend. However, invaded communities showed higher species richness and cultural ecosystem services than non-invaded communities. Our results suggest a negative relationship between socio-economic status and ecosystem service provision, with non-native species playing a major role in shaping this relationship. Our counterintuitive findings highlight the need for targeted management strategies that address both socio-economic and ecological inequalities in urban planning, in addition to non-native species management.