Data from: Invasive predator management can mitigate the impacts of fire and low rainfall for some herpetofauna
Data files
Jan 06, 2026 version files 20.61 KB
-
EE_Data_Jan_2025.csv
17.32 KB
-
README.md
3.29 KB
Abstract
Effective wildlife conservation relies on understanding how threats and associated management actions can interact to affect biodiversity. However, the impacts of concurrent disturbances on wildlife can be complex and difficult to predict. Altered fire regimes, invasive predators, and reduced rainfall are major threats to herpetofauna, but no research has investigated their interactive effects on any reptile or amphibian species to date. We employed a multi-year, crossed, control-impact design in southern Australia to examine the combined and independent effects of prescribed fire, invasive red fox (Vulpes vulpes) management, and low rainfall on reptile and amphibian richness and abundance. We found negative effects of prescribed fire on reptile species richness and the capture rates of four (out of five) herpetofauna species. Fox management had a positive main effect on one skink species, and there was some evidence for a negative association with a frog species. In addition, our results demonstrate important interactions for some species. For example, low rainfall exacerbated the negative effects of prescribed fire for two species, while fox management mitigated the negative effects of prescribed fire and low rainfall for two species. This is the first study investigating the interactive effects of these three key threats on herpetofauna. Our discoveries demonstrate that investigating interactive effects can help explain why species have spatially and temporally variable responses to disturbances. Our results suggest that it may be beneficial to avoid prescribed fires and increase invasive predator management during climatically stressful periods.
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.x69p8czrs
Files and variables
File: EE_Data_Jan_2025.csv
Description: Amphibian and reptile richness and capture rates for monthly sampling periods at each field site.
Variables
- EVC: ecological vegetation class (LF: Lowland forest, HRF: Herb-rich forest)
- site: name of site
- cluster: identifier for spatial clustering of sites
- baiting: fox management (baited, unbaited)
- F_sev: fire severity of site (unburnt, low severity, moderate severity)
- F_stat: fire status of site (unburnt, burnt)
- month: month of survey
- trap_group: category-based identifying sites surveyed concurrently (A, B, C, D)
- survey_effort: number of nights the site was trapped for during the survey period
- year: field season for site/survey (Year1: 2019/20), Year2: 2021/22)
- rainfall: category based on local average annual rainfall (low rainfall, average rainfall)
- survey_period: identifier for unique sampling periods (month-trap_group-year)
- date_range: date range of survey
- av_temp: mean maximum daily temperatures of survey period (excluding days when traps were closed)
- A_total: amphibian captures
- L_total: lizard captures
- A_rich: number of amphibian species
- R_rich: number of reptile species
- Acritoscincus.duperreyi: number of individuals caught of this species
- Anepischetosia.maccoyi: number of individuals caught of this species
- Eulamprus.tympanum: number of individuals caught of this species
- Lampropholis.guichenoti: number of individuals caught of this species
- Lissolepis.coventryi: number of individuals caught of this species
- Pseudemoia.entrecasteauxii: number of individuals caught of this species
- Tiliqua: number of individuals caught of this species
- Austrelaps.superbus: number of individuals caught of this species
- Drysdalia.coronoides: number of individuals caught of this species
- Notechis.scutatus: number of individuals caught of this species
- Geocrinia.laevis: number of individuals caught of this species
- Limnodynastes.dumerilii: number of individuals caught of this species
- Limnodynastes.peronii: number of individuals caught of this species
- Limnodynastes.tasmaniensis: number of individuals caught of this species
- Litoria.ewingii: number of individuals caught of this species
- Neobatrachus.sudellae: number of individuals caught of this species
- Pseudophryne.bibronii: number of individuals caught of this species
- Crinia.species: number of individuals caught of this species
- Sminthopsis.leucopus: number of individuals caught of this species
- Mus.musculus: number of individuals caught of this species
- Cercartetus.nanus: number of individuals caught of this species
Code/software
EE_Code_Oct_2025.R: This script analyzes how fire, predator baiting, rainfall, and temperature influence reptile and amphibian species richness and capture rates using generalized linear mixed models. It compares null and global models, performs model selection and diagnostics, and uses estimated marginal means to generate statistical summaries and publication-ready plots for multiple species.
- Macdonald, Kristina J.; Hradsky, Bronwyn A.; Doherty, Tim S.; Driscoll, Don A. (2026). Data from: Invasive predator management can mitigate the impacts of fire and low rainfall for some herpetofauna. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10594684
- Macdonald, Kristina J.; Hradsky, Bronwyn A.; Doherty, Tim S.; Driscoll, Don A. (2026). Data from: Invasive predator management can mitigate the impacts of fire and low rainfall for some herpetofauna. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10594683
- Macdonald, Kristina J.; Hradsky, Bronwyn A.; Doherty, Tim S.; Driscoll, Don A. (2025). Invasive Predator Management Can Mitigate the Impacts of Fire and Low Rainfall for Some Herpetofauna. Ecology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.72755
