Resource gradients create energy trade-offs in the inducible defense response of Paramecium aurelia
Data files
Nov 16, 2025 version files 394.20 KB
-
DataforMcClureandHammill2025.csv
389.46 KB
-
README.md
4.73 KB
Abstract
Ecological communities are structured by inter- and intraspecific interactions. The stability of communities is governed by the strength and number of species interactions. Therefore, mechanisms that act to decrease the interaction strength between species are thought to stabilize communities. One proposed stabilizing mechanism is the inducible defenses of prey. Inducible defenses are morphological and behavioral traits only expressed in the presence of a predator or under perceived predation threat. By creating a population of prey that is less susceptible to predation, inducible defenses reduce interaction strength between predators and prey. In this study, we evaluated the expression of an inducible defense in the protozoan, Paramecium aurelia, along two environmental gradients (perceived predation threat and basal nutrients) and for three clonal populations of P. aurelia. The three clonal populations display a range in expression of one morphological defense (i.e., increase in body width), with one population expected to display an inducible defense, one expected to remain in a permanently defended state, and one expected to remain in a permanently undefended state. We found that for the clone that displays an inducible defense, there was a tradeoff in energy expenditure that occurred at around 30 predators, in which protists in high nutrient concentrations were narrower than protists in low nutrient conditions, despite additional resources. These results indicate either that there are potential costs to inducible defenses or that energy gained from increased nutrients was being diverted elsewhere, such as for reproduction or maintenance. Additionally, for all three clonal populations, protist width approached an asymptote of max width at the highest nutrient concentrations, suggesting a diminishing or maximal benefit of protist width even if a tradeoff did not occur. In all, the results from our study provide information on the potential limits to the benefits of inducible defenses along two environmental gradients, and both bottom-up and top-down pressures interact to significantly affect the response of prey in predator-prey interactions. With an increased understanding of how bottom-up and top-down pressures are affecting species interactions, we can better predict changes in community composition and stability under changing environmental conditions.
Dataset DOI: 10.5061/dryad.xksn02vw0
Description of the data and file structure
In this study, we evaluated the expression of an inducible defense in the protozoan, Paramecium aurelia, along two environmental gradients (perceived predation threat and basal nutrients) and for three clonal populations of P. aurelia. The three clonal populations display a range in expression of one morphological defense (i.e., increase in body width), with one population expected to display an inducible defense, one expected to remain in a permanently defended state, and one expected to remain in a permanently undefended state. The study included a 6x8 full factorial design with six nutrient treatments and eight predator treatments that was replicated 10 times. We measured the length and width of 3-4 randomly chosen protists within each treatment combination. Data include the treatment combinations (i.e., Predator and Nutrient), data structure (i.e., Plate, Well, Replicate), protist ID (i.e., A, B, or C), protist length and width (measured in micrometers), and the length:width ratio.
Files and variables
File: DataforMcClureandHammill2025.csv
Description: Data on the length and widths of protists under varying nutrient and predator treatments. The study included a 6x8 full factorial design with 10 complete replicates. Experiments lasted 24 hours.
NOTE: NAs in the csv file are stand-in values for protists that were not measured for a given treatment combination. Additional photos of protists were taken if the photo quality was not clear (due to growth in the treatment media); however, given that some treatment combinations had a 4th protist measurement and some did not, we included the 'NA' to indicate this lack of 4th protist photo. These are indicated by the letter 'D' in the Protist column. The NA values are there to demonstrate that the 4th photo was not needed for that treatment.
Blank values in the width, length, and L:W columns are for replicate #6. The microscope settings for this replicate were not set correctly for several of the treatment combinations, and therefore, this replicate was removed from the study but remains in the attached data. These blanks are true NA values.
Variables
- Full ID: Name of the image file for each protist photo that was taken.
- Predator: This is the predator treatment. Values include 1, 3, 5, 10, 15, 20, 40, and 60 predators.
- Nutrient: This is the basal nutrient treatment. Values include 0.03, 0.07, 0.15, 0.30, 0.60, and 0.80 g (grams of protist pellet)
- Plate: This is the 24-well plate identifier (1 or 2). Because the treatments were randomly assigned to a well on one of two 24-well plates, and for statistical structure in our analysis, we needed to include this column in the data.
- Well: This is the well number across two 24-well plates (i.e., 48 total) randomly assigned to the treatment combination. Because the treatments were randomly assigned to a well on one of two 24-well plates, and for statistical structure in our analysis, we needed to include this column in the data.
- Rep: This is the replicate number. Values include 1-10. Two additional replicates were included (11 and 12) but not used for the analysis in the accompanying paper.
- Protist: This is the protist identification value (e.g., A, B, C, or D). Three or four protists were randomly selected from the treatment well and measured based on photos. Some treatments include a fourth protist due to the poor photo quality in these wells. The fourth protist was included for these wells to ensure an accurate representation of the populations within that treatment.
- Width: Width of the protist measured in micrometers.
- Length: Length of the protist measured in micrometers.
- L:W_Ratio: The length:width ratio of the protist calculated using the length and width values above.
- Clone: This is the clonal line of the protist. Clone ‘AUR’ is expected to display a morphological inducible response under predation threat (i.e., changes width based on the level of predation threat). Clone ‘FD4’ is ‘permanently expressed’ in that it is expected to remain in a wide physical state regardless of the level of predation threat. Clone ‘EV2’ does not display a morphological inducible defense (i.e., it is expected to remain in a narrower physical state regardless of predation threat).
Code/software
R-4.5.2 and R Studio
Access information
Other publicly accessible locations of the data:
- None
Data was derived from the following sources:
- None
