Data from: Stability and gene strand bias of lambda prophages and chromosome organization in Escherichia coli
Data files
May 27, 2024 version files 28.09 MB
-
Distributions_of_cI_and_gal_transcripts_in_Figs._2_and_S1_measured_in_different_genetic_backgrounds..opju
488.79 KB
-
Flow_cytometry_of_labelled_lysogenic_E._coli_strains_with_lambda_prophage_integrated_at_the_wild‐type_attB_site_(17.4’)_in_Fig._3.opju
56.48 KB
-
Range_expansions_data_and_analysis_in_Fig._4.opju
77.10 KB
-
README.md
1.98 KB
-
XTL855.txt
4.77 MB
-
XTL856.txt
4.77 MB
-
XTL862.txt
4.77 MB
-
XTL863.txt
3.62 MB
-
XTL893.txt
4.77 MB
-
XTL894.txt
4.77 MB
Abstract
Temperate phage-mediated horizontal gene transfer is a potent driver of genetic diversity in the evolution of bacteria. Most lambdoid prophages in E. coli are integrated into the chromosome with the same orientation with respect to the direction of chromosomal replication, and their location on the chromosome is far from homogeneous. To understand better these features, we studied the interplay between lysogenic and lytic states of phage lambda in both native and inverted integration orientations, at the wild-type integration site, as well as at other sites on the bacterial chromosome. Measurements of free phage released by spontaneous induction showed that the stability of lysogenic states is affected by location and orientation along the chromosome, with stronger effects near the origin of replication. Competition experiments and range expansions between lysogenic strains with opposite orientations and insertion loci indicated that there are no major differences in growth. Using single-molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization we quantified the level of transcriptional bursts of the cI gene coding for the lambda phage repressor. These measurements indicate that the stability of the lysogenic states at native and inverted orientations are different. We postulate that the preference for a given orientation and location is a result of a balance between the maintenance of lysogeny and the ability to lyse. Together, our findings shed light on key mechanisms that determine the genomic architecture in the bacterial chromosome.
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.zgmsbcck8
Deposited data includes the following data files used to generate different figures in the main text, with their respective description. Files of .opju type can be opened with OriginPro software (OriginLab Corporation).
Distributions of cI and gal transcripts in Figs. 2 and S1 measured in different genetic backgrounds. Origin file containing the smFISH data used to generate the histograms in Figs. 2 and S1 for the indicated experiments. The name of the workbooks denotes the figure of the respective normalized histograms. For each strain, the calculated mean and standard error (SE) per bin are given.
Flow cytometry of labelled lysogenic E. coli strains with lambda prophage integrated at the wild‐type attB site (17.4’) in Fig. 3. The data used to plot Fig. 3, in the workbook Flowcytometry, gives bar heights (columns B and D, sheet Figure3) and standard deviation (sd) (columns C and E). The calculation of means and SD for YFP and CFP labeled strains are given in the indicated sheets in the same workbook.
Range expansions data and analysis in Fig. 4. Origin file containing the ratios of areas of CFP- and YFP-labelled sectors in the range expansion assays shown in Fig. 4, corresponding to bacterial lysogenic strains bearing prophages integrated at the wild-type site. The raw data and its analysis are given in workbook Baredata. The data of weighted mean and standard errors from four independent experiments in workbook Statistics are given (columns I and J respectively).
Sequencing of the lambda phage in different strains and backgrounds. Text files (.txt) of nanopore sequencing of the indicated strains: XTL856 (MG1655), XTL855 (MG1655), XTL894 (MG1655), XTL893 (MG1655), and the recA-deleted strains: XTL862 and XTL863.
- Li, Xintian; Gallardo, Oscar; August, Elias et al. (2024). Stability and gene strand bias of lambda prophages and chromosome organization in Escherichia coli. mBio. https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.02078-23
