Skip to main content
Dryad

Data from: Cost effectiveness analysis of hormone therapy for breast cancer in Japan

Nakagawa, Naoto1; Chiba, Yuta1; Lai, Leanne2

Published Feb 25, 2026 on Dryad. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.zs7h44jkg

Data files

Feb 25, 2026 version files 22.44 KB

Click names to download individual files

Abstract

Breast cancer is one of the deadliest diseases in the world. It accounts for 22.2 % of all cancers and is the most common site of cancer in women in Japan. Although hormone therapy with aromatase inhibitors or tamoxifen has been widely used, it is unclear which agent is more cost-effective. This study examined the cost-effectiveness of anastrozole as an aromatase inhibitor from a healthcare payer's perspective compared to tamoxifen in Japan. A Markov model, for comparison, of anastrozole with tamoxifen as a reference agent, was developed using data from a randomized clinical trial conducted in Japan. The costs were derived from the Japanese Health Care Fee Index for 2022. Based on the results of a questionnaire on the general health-related quality of life associated with cancer (FACT-G), utilities were converted to EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level. The time horizon was set to 10 years. In addition, deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. Anastrozole was dominated by tamoxifen. One-way sensitivity analysis showed the expected value (EV) of incremental net monetary benefit for anastrozole was the most sensitive to the pharmaceutical "drug price of anastrozole in FY2022," where the generic drug price was applied. The EV remained negative across the other parameters. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed that anastrozole dominance over tamoxifen was 47.2 %. Anastrozole was less cost-effective than tamoxifen in Japan. Our findings support clinical practice and suggest payers and policymakers promote cost-effective therapies.