Supplementary_Information_1_2Dv3D_Rfolder

Buser T

Date Published: January 3, 2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.2p4k0/1

When using this data, please cite the original publication:

Buser TJ, Sidlauskas BL, Summers AP (2017) 2D or not 2D? testing the utility of 2D vs 3D landmark data in geometric morphometrics of the sculpin subfamily Oligocottinae (Pisces; Cottoidea). The Anatomical Record, online in advance of print. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.23752

Additionally, please cite the Dryad data package:

Buser TJ, Sidlauskas BL, Summers AP (2017) Data from: 2D or not 2D? testing the utility of 2D vs 3D landmark data in geometric morphometrics of the sculpin subfamily Oligocottinae (Pisces; Cottoidea). Dryad Digital Repository. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.2p4k0
Cite | Share
Download the data package citation in the following formats:
   RIS (compatible with EndNote, Reference Manager, ProCite, RefWorks)
   BibTex (compatible with BibDesk, LaTeX)

Files in this item

Content in the Dryad Digital Repository is offered "as is." By downloading files, you agree to the Dryad Terms of Service. To the extent possible under law, the authors have waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this data.   CC0 open data

Search for data

Be part of Dryad

We encourage organizations to: