Data from: Factoring economic costs into conservation planning may not improve agreement over priorities for protection

Armsworth PR, Jackson HB, Cho S, Clark M, Fargione JE, Iacona GD, Kim T, Larson ER, Minney T, Sutton NA

Date Published: December 22, 2017

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.415kb

Files in this package

Content in the Dryad Digital Repository is offered "as is." By downloading files, you agree to the Dryad Terms of Service. To the extent possible under law, the authors have waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this data. CC0 (opens a new window) Open Data (opens a new window)

Title Appalachian Ecological Benefits
Downloaded 5 times
Description Ecological benefits data measured for up to 96 parcels in Central Appalachia
Download Armsworth_ecologicaldata.xlsx (22.99 Kb)
Download README.txt (7.67 Kb)
Details View File Details

When using this data, please cite the original publication:

Armsworth PR, Jackson HB, Cho S, Clark M, Fargione JE, Iacona GD, Kim T, Larson ER, Minney T, Sutton NA (2017) Factoring economic costs into conservation planning may not improve agreement over priorities for protection. Nature Communications 8(1): 2253. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02399-y

Additionally, please cite the Dryad data package:

Armsworth PR, Jackson HB, Cho S, Clark M, Fargione JE, Iacona GD, Kim T, Larson ER, Minney T, Sutton NA (2017) Data from: Factoring economic costs into conservation planning may not improve agreement over priorities for protection. Dryad Digital Repository. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.415kb
Cite | Share
Download the data package citation in the following formats:
   RIS (compatible with EndNote, Reference Manager, ProCite, RefWorks)
   BibTex (compatible with BibDesk, LaTeX)

Search for data

Be part of Dryad

We encourage organizations to: