Skip to main content
Dryad

Data from: Non-monotonic temporal-weighting indicates a dynamically modulated evidence-integration mechanism

Cite this dataset

Bronfman, Zohar Z.; Brezis, Noam; Usher, Marius (2016). Data from: Non-monotonic temporal-weighting indicates a dynamically modulated evidence-integration mechanism [Dataset]. Dryad. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.46qm6

Abstract

Perceptual decisions are thought to be mediated by a mechanism of sequential sampling and integration of noisy evidence whose temporal weighting profile affects the decision quality. To examine temporal weighting, participants were presented with two brightness-fluctuating disks for 1, 2 or 3 seconds and were requested to choose the overall brighter disk at the end of each trial. By employing a signal-perturbation method, which deploys across trials a set of systematically controlled temporal dispersions of the same overall signal, we were able to quantify the participants’ temporal weighting profile. Results indicate that, for intervals of 1 or 2 sec, participants exhibit a primacy-bias. However, for longer stimuli (3-sec) the temporal weighting profile is non-monotonic, with concurrent primacy and recency, which is inconsistent with the predictions of previously suggested computational models of perceptual decision-making (drift-diffusion and Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes). We propose a novel, dynamic variant of the leaky-competing accumulator model as a potential account for this finding, and we discuss potential neural mechanisms.

Usage notes