Data from: Should scientists be required to use a model-based solution to adjust for possible distance-based detectability bias?

Hutto RL

Date Published: April 25, 2016

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.46tp6

 

Files in this package

Content in the Dryad Digital Repository is offered "as is." By downloading files, you agree to the Dryad Terms of Service. To the extent possible under law, the authors have waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this data. CC0 (opens a new window) Open Data (opens a new window)

Title Hutto 2016_Ecological Applications_data for Figures 2 and 3
Downloaded 14 times
Description Black-backed Woodpecker detection information from 7903 individual point count surveys conducted across western Montana. File includes abundance, fire severity surrounding the point, and distance information (if a bird was detected).
Download ECOAPPS2016_data for figures 2 and 3.csv (252.3 Kb)
Details View File Details

When using this data, please cite the original publication:

Hutto RL (2016) Should scientists be required to use a model-based solution to adjust for possible distance-based detectability bias?. Ecological Applications 26(5): 1287-1294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eap.1385

Additionally, please cite the Dryad data package:

Hutto RL (2016) Data from: Should scientists be required to use a model-based solution to adjust for possible distance-based detectability bias? Dryad Digital Repository. http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.46tp6
Cite | Share
Download the data package citation in the following formats:
   RIS (compatible with EndNote, Reference Manager, ProCite, RefWorks)
   BibTex (compatible with BibDesk, LaTeX)

Search for data

Be part of Dryad

We encourage organizations to: