Data from: Ecological restoration success is higher for natural regeneration than for active restoration in tropical forests

Crouzeilles R, Ferreira MS, Chazdon RL, Lindenmayer DB, Sansevero JBB, Monteiro L, Iribarrem A, Latawiec AE, Strassburg BBN

Date Published: December 5, 2017

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.5428h

Files in this package

Content in the Dryad Digital Repository is offered "as is." By downloading files, you agree to the Dryad Terms of Service. To the extent possible under law, the authors have waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this data. CC0 (opens a new window) Open Data (opens a new window)

Title Data
Downloaded 2 times
Download Data.txt (368.0 Kb)
Details View File Details
Title Meta_analysis_controlled
Downloaded 2 times
Download Meta_analysis_controlled.R (23.57 Kb)
Details View File Details
Title Meta_analysis_uncontrolled
Downloaded 2 times
Download Meta_analysis_uncontrolled.R (19.37 Kb)
Details View File Details

When using this data, please cite the original publication:

Crouzeilles R, Ferreira MS, Chazdon RL, Lindenmayer DB, Sansevero JBB, Monteiro L, Iribarrem A, Latawiec AE, Strassburg BBN (2017) Ecological restoration success is higher for natural regeneration than for active restoration in tropical forests. Science Advances 3(11): e1701345. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1701345

Additionally, please cite the Dryad data package:

Crouzeilles R, Ferreira MS, Chazdon RL, Lindenmayer DB, Sansevero JBB, Monteiro L, Iribarrem A, Latawiec AE, Strassburg BBN (2017) Data from: Ecological restoration success is higher for natural regeneration than for active restoration in tropical forests. Dryad Digital Repository. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.5428h
Cite | Share
Download the data package citation in the following formats:
   RIS (compatible with EndNote, Reference Manager, ProCite, RefWorks)
   BibTex (compatible with BibDesk, LaTeX)

Search for data

Be part of Dryad

We encourage organizations to: