Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kuebbing, Sara E.
dc.contributor.author Maynard, Daniel S.
dc.contributor.author Bradford, Mark A.
dc.coverage.spatial North Brandford
dc.coverage.spatial Connecticut
dc.coverage.spatial United States of America
dc.coverage.spatial 41.336439 N
dc.coverage.spatial -72.783104W
dc.coverage.temporal Holocene
dc.date.accessioned 2017-07-14T19:30:46Z
dc.date.available 2017-07-14T19:30:46Z
dc.date.issued 2017-07-07
dc.identifier doi:10.5061/dryad.cb2f5
dc.identifier.citation Kuebbing SE, Maynard DS, Bradford MA (2017) Linking functional diversity and ecosystem processes: a framework for using functional diversity metrics to predict the ecosystem impact of functionally unique species. Journal of Ecology, online in advance of print.
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.150564
dc.description 1.Functional diversity (FD) metrics are widely used to assess invasion ecosystem impacts, but we have limited theory to predict how FD should respond to invasion. A key challenge to effectively using FD metrics is the complexity of conceptualizing alterations to multi-dimensional trait space, making it difficult to select a priori the most appropriate metric for specific ecological questions. 2.Here, we provide expectations on how invasion should change four commonly used FD metrics—functional richness (FRic), evenness (FEve), divergence (FDiv), and dispersion (FDis)—and then test these expectations in a lab decomposition experiment. We simulate invasion of a forest by understory plants by adding leaf litter from 18 natives and nonnatives to a representative canopy tree litter mixture to test changes in FD and decomposition. 3.All four metrics changed predictably with invasion. Species that were more functionally unique or when added at greater proportions had larger impacts on FD. Overall, FRic, FEve, and FDiv were poor choices for understanding impacts of nonnative species. FDis was the only metric that both changed predictably with addition of understory litter and correlated intuitively with changes in carbon mineralization. Furthermore, ranking species based upon how much they changed FDis of the litter mixture provided a fair assessment of which species had the largest impact on decomposition. As such, functional dispersion may be a key tool for predicting a priori which nonnatives will have the greatest impact on ecosystem processes. 4.Synthesis: We highlight the need to assess the suitability of each FD metric for the specific ecological question at hand. Our work reveals the pitfalls of considering multiple metrics or randomly choosing a single metric without suitability assessments. At the same time, it suggests a framework for metric assessment that should help lead to selection of a metric or metrics that provide robust a priori insights into how invasion by nonnative species can impact ecosystem processes.
dc.relation.haspart doi:10.5061/dryad.cb2f5/1
dc.relation.isreferencedby doi:10.1111/1365-2745.12835
dc.subject alien
dc.subject exotic
dc.subject decomposition
dc.subject invasive ecology
dc.subject functional dispersion
dc.subject functional divergence
dc.subject functional evenness
dc.subject functional richness
dc.title Data from: Linking functional diversity and ecosystem processes: a framework for using functional diversity metrics to predict the ecosystem impact of functionally unique species
dc.type Article
dwc.ScientificName Carya ovata
dwc.ScientificName Quercus alba
dwc.ScientificName Quercus rubra
dwc.ScientificName Carex debilis
dwc.ScientificName Microstegium vimineum
dwc.ScientificName Cynanchum louiseae
dwc.ScientificName Symphyotrichum cordifolium
dwc.ScientificName Berberis thunbergii
dwc.ScientificName Elaeagnus umbellata
dwc.ScientificName Euonymus alatus
dwc.ScientificName Lindera benzoin
dwc.ScientificName Rosa multiflora
dwc.ScientificName Rubus idaeus
dwc.ScientificName Rubus occidentalis
dwc.ScientificName Rubus phoenicolasius
dwc.ScientificName Carpinus caroliniana
dwc.ScientificName Hamamelis virginiana
dwc.ScientificName Ostrya virginiana
dwc.ScientificName Celastrus orbiculatus
dwc.ScientificName Lonicera japonica
dwc.ScientificName Parthenocissus quinquefolia
dc.contributor.correspondingAuthor Kuebbing, Sara
prism.publicationName Journal of Ecology

Files in this package

Content in the Dryad Digital Repository is offered "as is." By downloading files, you agree to the Dryad Terms of Service. To the extent possible under law, the authors have waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this data. CC0 (opens a new window) Open Data (opens a new window)

Title Kuebbing et al. 2017, Journal of Ecology, Functional Diversity and Invasion Impacts
Downloaded 14 times
Description A full description of this data set can be found in Kuebbing, SE, DS Maynard, and MA Bradford (2017) Linking functional diversity and ecosystem processes: a framework for using functional diversity metrics to predict the ecosystem impact of functionally unique species. Journal of Ecology. DATA SET 1: Brief Methods (for full methods see Kuebbing et al. 2017, Journal of Ecology). We used laboratory microcosm experiments to assess litter decomposition dynamics of litter mixtures. Each microcosm consisted of 1 g of 2 mm-milled leaf litter and 0.25 g of mineral soil in 50-mL centrifuge tubes. Each microcosm contained in equal proportion litter from each of the three dominant canopy trees (Carya cordiformis, Quercus alba, and Q. rubra), in addition to one of the 18 understory plants. The latter were added at three relative abundances (1%, 5%, and 25%). There were 216 microcosms (18 understory plants × 3 proportions [1%, 5%, and 25%] × 4 replicates) and 4 tree-canopy litter control replicates, bringing the total number of microcosms to 220. DATA SET 2: Brief Methods (for full methods see Kuebbing et al. 2017, Journal of Ecology). To assess green leaf traits, we collected 5 green leaves from a minimum of 5 individuals per species in summer 2014. For canopy trees, we “sling-shot sampled” canopy branches to collect full-sun leaves. For understory species, we randomly sampled leaves from individuals. We selected leaves that appeared free of herbivory as well as fungal or bacterial infection. We scanned fully-hydrated leaves on a flatbed scanner within 24 h of collection and then dried them at 60°C for 72 h before measuring mass. To estimate specific leaf area, we measured scanned leaf surface area with digital software (ImageJ v.1.51f) and divided area by dry mass. To assess the green leaf chemical traits, we ball milled the material (Spex CertiPrep 8000-D Mixer Mill, Metuchen, New Jersey, USA) and determined C and N concentrations using Micro-Dumas combustion analysis. To assess leaf litter traits, we collected litter in fall 2014 from senescing plants. We collected freshly-fallen leaves from the ground or shook senesced leaves free from branches. Litter was air-dried and leaves were selected that had no evidence of fungal colonization or herbivory. We milled all litter to pass a 2-mm mesh (Wiley® Cutting Mill, Model 2, Thomas Scientific, Swedesboro, New Jersey, USA), creating a consistent size class across species (Strickland et al. 2009; Keiser et al. 2011; 2013). We used the same method as for green leaves to determine litter total N and C. To assess litter P we used acid digestion and colorimetric analysis of milled litter. To measure lignin we used the ANKOM acid detergent lignin method (ANKOM Technology, Macedon NY; protocol at www.ankom.com). We report total C, N and P on a percent mass basis and acid detergent lignin (ADL) on a per gram dry mass basis.
Download Kuebbing, Sara_Data for Dryad.xlsx (77.94 Kb)
Details View File Details

Search for data

Be part of Dryad

We encourage organizations to: