Data from: Comparison of capture and storage methods for aqueous macrobial eDNA using an optimized extraction protocol: advantage of enclosed filter

Spens J, Evans AR, Halfmaerten D, Knudsen SW, Sengupta ME, Mak SST, Sigsgaard EE, Hellström M

Date Published: November 23, 2016

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.p2q4r

 

Files in this package

Content in the Dryad Digital Repository is offered "as is." By downloading files, you agree to the Dryad Terms of Service. To the extent possible under law, the authors have waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this data. CC0 (opens a new window) Open Data (opens a new window)

Title Spens_et_al_2016_DATASET
Downloaded 19 times
Description This is the output from the original trial conducted in 2015.
Download Spens_et_al_2016_DATASET.txt (106.9 Kb)
Download README.txt (759 bytes)
Details View File Details

When using this data, please cite the original publication:

Spens J, Evans AR, Halfmaerten D, Knudsen SW, Sengupta ME, Mak SST, Sigsgaard EE, Hellström M (2016) Comparison of capture and storage methods for aqueous macrobial eDNA using an optimized extraction protocol: advantage of enclosed filter. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 8(5): 635–645. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.12683

Additionally, please cite the Dryad data package:

Spens J, Evans AR, Halfmaerten D, Knudsen SW, Sengupta ME, Mak SST, Sigsgaard EE, Hellström M (2016) Data from: Comparison of capture and storage methods for aqueous macrobial eDNA using an optimized extraction protocol: advantage of enclosed filter. Dryad Digital Repository. http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.p2q4r
Cite | Share
Download the data package citation in the following formats:
   RIS (compatible with EndNote, Reference Manager, ProCite, RefWorks)
   BibTex (compatible with BibDesk, LaTeX)

Search for data

Be part of Dryad

We encourage organizations to: