Floral resources (nectar and pollen) provide food for insect pollinators but have declined in the countryside due to land use change. Given widespread pollinator loss, it is important that we quantify their food supply to help develop conservation actions. While nectar resources have been measured in rural landscapes, equivalent data are lacking for urban areas, an important knowledge gap as towns and cities often host diverse pollinator populations.

We quantified the nectar supply of urban areas, farmland and nature reserves in the UK by combining floral abundance and nectar sugar production data for 536 flowering plant taxa, allowing us to compare landscape types and assess the spatial distribution of nectar sugar among land uses within cities.

The magnitude of nectar sugar production did not differ significantly among the three landscapes. In urban areas the nectar supply was more diverse in origin and predominantly delivered by non-native flowering plants. Within cities, urban land uses varied greatly in nectar sugar production. Gardens provided the most nectar sugar per unit area and 85% of all nectar at a city scale, while gardens and allotments produced the most diverse supplies of nectar sugar. Floral abundance, commonly used as a proxy for pollinators’ food supply, correlated strongly with nectar resources, but left a substantial proportion of the variation in nectar supply unexplained.

Synthesis. We show that urban areas are hotspots of floral resource diversity rather than quantity and their nectar supply is underpinned by the contribution of residential gardens. Individual gardeners have an important role to play in pollinator conservation as ornamental plants, usually non-native in origin, are a key source of nectar in towns and cities.

Data: nectar sugar production of plant taxa (data available from 01 August 2022)

[N.B. See 'Related Works' for data on floral abundance, and nectar production scaled to site level]

Nectar_sugar_per_taxon.xlsx - nectar sugar values (micrograms of sugars per 24 hours per floral unit) and floral traits used in predictive modelling for each plant taxon.

• Tab 1 = ‘Sugar_values’ - native status, floral unit definition, sugar mass per floral unit & data source/comments for each of the 536 recorded taxa (both empirical and modelled values).
• Tab 2 = ‘Predictive_modelling’ - floral traits (plant family, floral unit type, flower shape, floral unit size) for the 326 taxa with empirical values (‘duplicates’ excluded) and 114 taxa that were subsequently modelled.