Skip to main content
Dryad

Wildfire severity data for Sierra Nevada-Southern Cascades from 1984–2020

Data files

Dec 28, 2022 version files 3.82 MB

Abstract

Although fire is a fundamental ecological process in western North American forests, climate warming and accumulating forest fuels due to fire suppression have led to wildfires that burn at high severity across larger fractions of their footprint than were historically typical. These trends have spiked upwards in recent years and are particularly pronounced in the Sierra Nevada-southern Cascades ecoregion of California, USA and neighboring states. We assessed annual area burned and percentage of area burned at high and low-to-moderate severity for seven major forest types in this region from 1984 to 2020. We compared values for this period against estimates for the pre-Euro-American settlement (EAS) period prior to 1850 and against a previous study of trends from 1984–2009. Our results show that total average annual area burned remained below pre-EAS levels, but that gap is decreasing (i.e., c. 14% of pre-EAS for 19842009, but 39% for 20102020 [including c. 150% in 2020]). Although average annual area burned has remained low compared to pre-EAS, both the average annual area burned at high severity and the percentage of wildfire area burned at high severity have increased rapidly. The percentage of area burned at high severity – which was already above pre-EAS average for the 19842009 period – has continued to rise for five of seven forest types. Notably, between 2010 and 2020, the average annual area burned at high severity exceeded the pre-EAS average for the first time on record. By contrast, percentage of area that burned at low-to-moderate severity decreased, particularly in the lower elevation oak and mixed conifer forest types. These findings underline how forests historically adapted to frequent low-to-moderate-severity fire are being reshaped by novel proportions and extents of high-severity burning. The shift toward a high severity-dominated fire regime is associated with ecological disruptions, including changes in forest structure, species composition, carbon storage, wildlife habitat, ecosystem services, and resilience. Our results underscore the importance of finding a better balance between the current management focus on fire suppression and one that puts greater emphasis on proactive fuel reduction and increased forest resilience to climate change and ecological disturbance.