Data from: Constraints and variation in food web link-species space
Data files
Mar 26, 2021 version files 695.13 KB
-
Afon_Hafren_Adj.txt
1.25 KB
-
Aire_Adj.txt
7.20 KB
-
Allt_aMharcaidh_Adj.txt
3.20 KB
-
Alvarado_Adj.txt
1.80 KB
-
Angola_Adj.txt
1.57 KB
-
Antarctica_Adj.txt
1.57 KB
-
BearIsland_Adj.txt
1.92 KB
-
Benguela_Adj.txt
1.68 KB
-
Bere_Stream_Adj.txt
8.71 KB
-
Berwick_Adj.txt
11.86 KB
-
BlackRock_Adj.txt
14.45 KB
-
BracoMorto_Adj.txt
3.04 KB
-
BridgeBrook_Adj.txt
11.25 KB
-
Broad_Adj.txt
17.67 KB
-
Broadstone_Adj.txt
1.25 KB
-
Cadiz_Adj.txt
3.87 KB
-
Canton_Adj.txt
23.33 KB
-
Carpinteria_Adj.txt
32.77 KB
-
Chesapeake_Adj.txt
2.18 KB
-
Coachella_Adj.txt
1.80 KB
-
CoralReef_Adj.txt
5 KB
-
Corrente_Adj.txt
338 B
-
Coweeta1_Adj.txt
6.73 KB
-
Coweeta17_Adj.txt
10.08 KB
-
DeepCreek_Adj.txt
2.05 KB
-
DempstersAu_Adj.txt
13.78 KB
-
DempstersSp_Adj.txt
17.30 KB
-
DempstersSu_Adj.txt
22.90 KB
-
Duddon_Pike_Beck_Adj.txt
2.45 KB
-
Food_web_metadata_NEW.csv
12.42 KB
-
Hardknott_Gill_Adj.txt
3.87 KB
-
Healy_Adj.txt
18.43 KB
-
Huizache_Adj.txt
1.35 KB
-
Itaipu87_Adj.txt
2.05 KB
-
Itaipu92_Adj.txt
2.18 KB
-
Kyeburn_Adj.txt
19.21 KB
-
LasCuevas_Adj.txt
54.45 KB
-
Martins_Adj.txt
21.63 KB
-
Mill_Stream_Adj.txt
15.14 KB
-
MojavePar_Adj.txt
2.74 KB
-
Mondego_Adj.txt
1.35 KB
-
Monterey_Adj.txt
2.74 KB
-
NorthCali_Adj.txt
12.80 KB
-
NorthCol_Adj.txt
12.17 KB
-
Onca_Adj.txt
3.20 KB
-
OsaScavenger_Adj.txt
5 KB
-
Parana_Adj.txt
3.20 KB
-
Pawnee_Adj.txt
35.38 KB
-
Porteirinho_Adj.txt
28.32 KB
-
Powder_Adj.txt
12.17 KB
-
QuickPond_Adj.txt
25.54 KB
-
README
1.59 KB
-
Saguaro_Adj.txt
4.61 KB
-
Sarracenia_Adj.txt
16.56 KB
-
ScotiaSea_Adj.txt
6.27 KB
-
Skipwith_Adj.txt
2.74 KB
-
StMarks_Adj.txt
4.61 KB
-
StMartin_Adj.txt
3.87 KB
-
Stony_Adj.txt
25.09 KB
-
struct_data_NEW.csv
8.25 KB
-
SuttonAu_Adj.txt
12.80 KB
-
SuttonSp_Adj.txt
10.95 KB
-
SuttonSu_Adj.txt
14.79 KB
-
Troy_Adj.txt
11.55 KB
-
UKGrassland_Adj.txt
15.14 KB
-
Venlaw_Adj.txt
8.45 KB
-
Vilas_Adj.txt
11.86 KB
-
WetTropics_Adj.txt
7.69 KB
Abstract
Predicting food web structure in future climates is a pressing goal of ecology. These predictions may be impossible without a solid understanding of the factors that structure current food webs. The most fundamental aspect of food-web structure—the relationship between the number of links and species—is still poorly understood. Some species interactions may be physically or physiologically ‘forbidden’—like consumption by non-consumer species—with possible consequences for food web structure. We show that accounting for these ‘forbidden interactions’ constrains the feasible link-species space, in tight agreement with empirical data. Rather than following one particular scaling relationship, food webs are distributed throughout this space according to shared biotic and abiotic features. Our study provides new insights into the long-standing question of which factors determine this fundamental aspect of food web structure.
The 65 food webs used are described elsewhere[16, 45] and were taken from the Interaction Web Database (https://www.nceas.ucsb.edu/interactionweb/), the GlobalWeb food web database (https://www.globalwebdb.com/), and the R package cheddar[49]. The data span all continents, encompass terrestrial, marine, estuarine, and freshwater ecosystems, and average 64 species and 427 interactions (details in Appendix 1). All data and code used in this study can be found at https://github.com/JPGibert/FWs_LS_feasibility_space.
Species in columns eat species in rows