Data from: Effectiveness of novel hybrid mangrove living shorelines is context dependent
Data files
Mar 07, 2025 version files 263.84 KB
-
2020_raw2.csv
50.60 KB
-
a2y_data.csv
83.55 KB
-
g2y_data.csv
62.03 KB
-
l2y_data.csv
63.79 KB
-
README.md
3.87 KB
Abstract
Novel designs of hard structures can address challenges to mangrove survival and serve as effective hybrid nature-based coastal protection. However, a limited understanding of how structures affect mangrove survival may lead to ineffective applications of techniques across diverse environments, potentially resulting in mangrove planting failures. To test how ecologically engineered planting pods may enhance mangrove survival and facilitate natural recruitment, we deployed them at three sites experiencing erosion in Victoria, Australia. We then planted propagules and seedlings inside the pods and on the onshore side, and monitored their survival and growth over time. Mangrove pods were effective in Altona (bare mudflats with sparse mangroves naturally present) when Avicennia marina were planted in pods and on the onshore side of pods and in the short-term for those planted in the pods at Lang Lang (bare mudflats without historical mangrove presence). However, they were ineffective for A. marina planted at Grantville (bare mudflats that previously supported mangroves), although they may facilitate natural propagule accumulation. Synthesis and applications: Our study highlights that the effectiveness of hybrid planting techniques is highly context dependent. The absence of mangroves and other vegetative species may result in increased erosional processes that challenge mangrove survival, which the planting pods may not be able to overcome. These findings underscore the need for better understanding of mangrove survival thresholds at different life stages and the ecological factors that influence them, such as historical mangrove presence. Refining the design of hybrid structures to account for site-specific factors will be key to improving their effectiveness. Rather than a standalone solution, these techniques should be considered as part of a broader range of interventions, integrated alongside other restoration and coastal protection strategies to maximise ecological and protective benefits across diverse coastal settings.
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.7wm37pw36
Description of the data and file structure
Year 1 (2020) data:
Mangrove survival was monitored and number of leaves was counted for 9 months at Altona and Lang Lang, and for 10 months at Grantville.
Year 2 (2021) data:
Mangrove survival was monitored across the three sites, 35 months for Altona and Grantville, and 12 months for Lang Lang.
Files and variables
File: 2020_raw2.csv
Description:
Variables
- site: site name
- days: number of days from planting
- month: number of months from planting
- pod: type of pod or control
- treatment: position relative to pod (array: inside; inland: onshore)
- location: the pod row (either front or back)
- rep: array number
- no.stake: pods with missing stakes
- dead: number of dead mangroves
- seed: number of propagules
- stem: number of propagules with stems
- two: number of seedlings with 2 leaves
- four: number of seedlings with 4 leaves
- six: number of seedlings with 6 leaves
- eight: number of seedlings with 8 leaves
- ten: number of seedlings with 10 leaves
- twelve: number of seedlings with 12 leaves
- total: total number of mangroves in the array
File: g2y_data.csv
Description:
Variables
- location: site name
- treatment: type of pod or control
- site: array number
- type: the pod row (either front or back)
- pod: position relative to pod (array: inside; inland: onshore)
- trt: treatment
- planting: type of mangrove (old: survivor from 2020, seed: propagule planted, seedling: nursery-reared seedling planted)
- 2: number alive 2 months after planting
- 4: number alive 4 months after planting
- 8: number alive 8 months after planting
- 12: number alive 12 months after planting
- 15: number alive 15 months after planting
- 19: number alive 19 months after planting
- 22: number alive 22 months after planting
- 28: number alive 28 months after planting
- 35: number alive 35 months after planting
- count: number of monitoring months
- month: last month monitored alive
- status: status of last monitoring (1: dead, 0: alive)
File: a2y_data.csv
Description:
Variables
- location: site name
- treatment: type of pod or control
- site: array number
- type: the pod row (either front or back)
- pod: position relative to pod (array: inside; inland: onshore)
- trt: treatment
- planting: type of mangrove (old: survivor from 2020, seed: propagule planted, seedling: nursery-reared seedling planted)
- 2: number alive 2 months after planting
- 5: number alive 5 months after planting
- 8: number alive 8 months after planting
- 11: number alive 11 months after planting
- 15: number alive 15 months after planting
- 19: number alive 19 months after planting
- 23: number alive 23 months after planting
- 28: number alive 28 months after planting
- 35: number alive 35 months after planting
- count: number of monitoring months
- month: last month monitored alive
- status: status of last monitoring (1: dead, 0: alive)
File: l2y_data.csv
Description:
Variables
- location: site name
- treatment: type of pod or control
- site: array number
- type: the pod row (either front or back)
- pod: position relative to pod (array: inside; inland: onshore)
- trt: treatment
- planting: type of mangrove (old: survivor from 2020, seed: propagule planted, seedling: nursery-reared seedling planted)
- 2: number alive 2 months after planting
- 8: number alive 8 months after planting
- 12: number alive 12 months after planting
- count: number of monitoring months
- month: last month monitored alive
- status: status of last monitoring (1: dead, 0: alive)
Code/software
R was used to analyse the data as outlined in the manuscript