Cranial kinesis facilitates quick retraction of stuck woodpecker beaks
Data files
Feb 22, 2022 version files 505.34 MB
-
README.txt
568 B
-
scale_factors.txt
209 B
-
Seq1_IND2_1500FPS.zip
38.91 MB
-
Seq1.csv
24.58 KB
-
Seq10_IND2_1500FPS.zip
60.54 MB
-
Seq10.csv
31.69 KB
-
Seq2_IND1_500FPS.zip
31.01 MB
-
Seq2.csv
7.30 KB
-
Seq3_IND2_1500FPS.zip
32.95 MB
-
Seq3.csv
19.89 KB
-
Seq4_IND2_1533FPS.zip
33.50 MB
-
Seq4.csv
23.29 KB
-
Seq5_IND2_1533FPS.zip
40.10 MB
-
Seq5.csv
27.32 KB
-
Seq6_IND1_500FPS.zip
26.42 MB
-
Seq6.csv
6.05 KB
-
Seq7_IND1_500FPS.zip
91.13 MB
-
Seq7.csv
14.45 KB
-
Seq8_IND1_500FPS.zip
80.96 MB
-
Seq8.csv
13.17 KB
-
Seq9_IND1_500FPS.zip
69.63 MB
-
Seq9.csv
11.84 KB
Abstract
Much like nails that are hammered into wood, the beaks of woodpeckers regularly get stuck upon impact. A kinematic video analysis of pecking by black woodpeckers shows how they manage to quickly withdraw their beaks, revealing a two-phase pattern: first a few degrees of nose-down rotation about the nasofrontal hinge causes the tip of the upper beak to be retruded while its proximal end is lifted. Next, the head is lifted, causing nose-up rotation about the nasofrontal hinge while the lower beak starts retruding and initiates the final freeing. We hypothesise that these consecutive actions, taking place in about 0.05 s, facilitate beak retraction by exploiting the presumably low frictional resistance between the upper and lower beak keratin surfaces, allowing them to slide past each other. It also demonstrates the counter-intuitive value of maintaining cranial kinesis in a species adapted to deliver forceful impacts.
See publication.
See README file.