Data from: An empirical comparison of a character-based and a coalescent-based approach to species delimitation in a young avian complex
Data files
Jul 16, 2013 version files 1.57 MB
-
12630 Align Phased.fas
24.47 KB
-
13403 Align Phased.fas
38.72 KB
-
14572 Align Phased.fas
37.27 KB
-
15463 Align Phased.fas
36.07 KB
-
17898 Align Phased.fas
30.67 KB
-
22187 Align Phased.fas
26.67 KB
-
23361 Align Phased.fas
26.17 KB
-
24972 Align Phased.fas
35.47 KB
-
25442 Align Phased.fas
33.12 KB
-
25613 Align Phased.fas
25.17 KB
-
27331 Align Phased.fas
41.27 KB
-
27818 Align Phased.fas
32.67 KB
-
BPP_files.zip
996.95 KB
-
CHBU Plumage.xlsx
57.45 KB
-
MUSK Align Phased.fas
31.07 KB
-
ND2 Align Full.phy
73.92 KB
-
ND2 Align Trimmed.fasta
26.33 KB
Abstract
The process of discovering species is a fundamental responsibility of systematics. Recently, there has been a growing interest in coalescent-based methods of species delimitation aimed at objectively identifying species early in the divergence process. However, few empirical studies have compared these new methods with character-based approaches for discovering species. In this study, we applied both a character-based and a coalescent-based approaches to delimit species in a closely related avian complex, the light-vented/Taiwan bulbul (Pycnonotus sinensis/Pycnonotus taivanus). Population aggregation analyses of plumage, mitochondrial and 13 nuclear intron character data sets produced conflicting species hypotheses with plumage data suggesting three species, mitochondrial data suggesting two species, and nuclear intron data suggesting one species. Such conflict is expected among recently diverged species, and by integrating all sources of data, we delimited three species verified with independently congruent character evidence as well as a more weakly supported fourth species identified by a single character. Attempts to validate species hypothesis using Bayesian Phylogenetics and Phylogeography (BPP), a coalescent-based method of species delimitation, revealed several issues that can seemingly affect statistical support for species recognition. We found that θ priors had a dramatic impact on speciation probabilities, with lower values consistently favouring splitting and higher values consistently favouring lumping. More resolved guide trees also resulted in overall higher speciation probabilities. Finally, we found suggestive evidence that BPP is sensitive to the divergent effects of nonrandom mating caused by intraspecific processes such as isolation-with-distance, and therefore, BPP may not be a conservative method for delimiting independently evolving population lineages. Based on these concerns, we questioned the reliability of BPP results and based our conclusions about species limits exclusively on character data.