Revisiting the burglar-alarm hypothesis: a behavioral cascade mediated by dinoflagellate bioluminescence
Data files
Dec 05, 2023 version files 70.87 KB
-
Huang_et_al.2023.xlsx
69.22 KB
-
README.md
1.65 KB
Abstract
Bioluminescence is widespread among marine organisms and has evolved independently multiple times. While its specific adaptive value is diverse, bioluminescence in most cases mediates fundamental interactions between individuals (predator, prey, mates) and thus impacts ecosystem processes. One hypothesized value of bioluminescence in dinoflagellates is through the ‘burglar alarm’: grazers of phytoplankton will make the ambient water ‘glow’ as they swim, thereby attracting visual predators of the grazer, thus indirectly protecting the dinoflagellates.
However, the most important grazers of dinoflagellates, copepods, are generally too small to elicit dinoflagellates to glow. Only individual cells captured by a copepod will flash, which in turn elicits a powerful escape response in the copepod. Here, we test a variant of this hypothesis that may work for copepods. The behavioral response of the grazer to the flashing of a captured dinoflagellate, rather than the flashing itself, attracts the attention of the grazer’s flow-sensing predators.
We demonstrate that bioluminescence in three dinoflagellates reduces the clearance- and ingestion rate of nauplii of the copepod Temora longicornis. The presence of bioluminescent cells also elicited an increased frequency of high-speed jumps of the grazers. The increased jump frequency elevated the detectability of the grazers to a flow-sensing predator, the copepod Centropages typicus, consequently leading to increased predation mortality of T. longicornis nauplii. The consequent behavioral cascade mediated by bioluminescence works for small grazers that cause only single cells to flash, unlike the traditional description of the burglar alarm.
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.kd51c5bd3
Description of the data and file structure
The excel file contains five sheets, with the variables in each sheet as below:
1) Grazing exp.
- Cell concentrations of dinoflagellates (at flashing and nonflashing phases) at the beginning and end of grazing experiments in the presence and absence of Temora
- Number of Temora in each replicate
- Clearance- and ingestions rates of Temora on dinoflagellates at flashing and nonflashing phases
2) Jump behavior
- Jump-related parameters (including jump frequency, jump duration, jump velocity, jump time proportion and jump distance) in Temora responding to dinoflagellates at flashing and nonflashing phases under three cell concentrations
3) Predation exp.
- Temora number in control groups in predation experiments
- Number and dry weight of Temora at the end of predation experiments
- Number and dry weight of Centropages at the end of predation experiments
- Clearance- and ingestions rates of Centropages on Temora in the presence of dinoflagellates at flashing and nonflashing phases
4) Temora size in grazing exp.
- Body length of Temora feeding on dinoflagellates at flashing and nonflashing phases in the grazing experiments
5) Both size in predation exp.
- Body length of Temora and prosome length of Centropages in the predation experiments
All blank cells are explained in each sheet, separately.
Sharing/Access information
NA.
Code/Software
NA.