Data from: Comparative patterns of temporal decay and detectability of eDNA and eRNA across molecular markers in connected and isolated freshwater mesocosms using digital PCR
Data files
Aug 15, 2025 version files 70.76 KB
-
datasets.xlsx
66.15 KB
-
README.md
4.61 KB
Abstract
Efficient use of environmental nucleic acids (eNAs) in freshwater biodiversity monitoring requires understanding their degradation and detectability in interconnected ecosystems. Environmental RNA (eRNA), which degrades faster than environmental DNA (eDNA), can enhance the temporal resolution of biological signals. This study employs a novel field-scale assay to investigate decay rates and detectability of eDNA and eRNA across four genetic markers (16S, 18S, COI, and LDHA) in 1000-liter connected and isolated mesocosms containing natural planktonic assemblages, assessing how connectivity influences detectability over time. This design bridges small-scale laboratory assays with more complex, ecologically relevant settings. Using digital PCR (dPCR), we captured fine-scale temporal patterns across mitochondrial and nuclear markers and transcript types (mRNA and rRNA), an approach rarely combined in previous research. Isolated and head mesocosms were spiked with eNAs from cultured Daphnia pulex, absent from the water source. Downstream mesocosms received eNAs via unidirectional water transfers. The experiment spanned 24 days, with water samples collected at nine time points post-spike (0, 1, 6, 8, 24, 48, 72, 168, and 576 hours). From each mesocosm, four replicate water samples were collected at each time point—two for eDNA and two for eRNA analyses. eRNA degraded significantly faster than eDNA across all markers and mesocosm types. Among RNA types, mRNA (COI, LDHA) degraded faster than rRNA (16S, 18S). While decay rates remained consistent across the network, detectability declined with dilution. We found that eRNA followed a uniform monophasic decay pattern, whereas eDNA displayed biphasic decay for nuclear and monophasic decay for mitochondrial markers. eNA decay rates in this field-relevant mesocosm network exceeded those from laboratory scale. Both eNAs were detected in terminal mesocosms despite a 10,000-fold dilution, demonstrating transport. Despite rapid RNA degradation, high detectability was achieved using dPCR across dilutions, highlighting eRNA's utility for detecting active biological communities in freshwater systems.
Dataset DOI: 10.5061/dryad.kprr4xhh4
Description of the data and file structure
This README_file.txt file was generated on 2025-07-22 by Wendy Morgado
GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Title: Data supporting "Comparative patterns of temporal decay and detectability of eDNA and eRNA across molecular markers in connected and isolated freshwater mesocosms using digital PCR"
2. Author Information
Name: Wendy B. Morgado-Gamero
Institution: Stewart Biology Building, McGill University
Address: 1205 Dr Penfield Ave, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1B1
Email: wendy.morgadogamero@mail.mcgill.ca, wbmorgadogamero@gmail.com
Name: Orianne Tournayre
Institution: Stewart Biology Building, McGill University
Address: 1205 Dr Penfield Ave, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1B1
Email: orianne.tournayre@gmail.com
Name: Melania E. Cristescu
Institution: Stewart Biology Building, McGill University
Address: 1205 Dr Penfield Ave, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1B1
Email: melania.cristescu@mcgill.ca
3. Date of data collection (range, approximate date): 2021 - 2023
4. Geographic location of data collection: Mont-Saint Hilaire, Quebec, Canada
5. Keywords: environmental DNA, environmental RNA, biomonitoring, decay rates, aquatic ecosystems, mesocosms, molecular markers, digital PCR.
6. Information about funding sources that supported the collection of the data: NSERC Discovery Grant, the Genome Canada BIOSCAN Canada initiative, as well as the Government of Canada’s New Frontiers in Research Fund (NFRF) T2020, BIOSCAN: Tracing the Patterns of Life on a Changing Planet.
SHARING/ACCESS INFORMATION
This is an original dataset generated using the methods as described in the resulting publication.
DATA & FILE OVERVIEW
1. File List:
This file contains the following data tables generated for this study:
- Data summary table. Average concentration (copies/mL) and standard deviation (SD) between sample replicates for each mesocosm replicate (a, b, c), eNA molecule (eRNA, eDNA), marker (COI, 18S, 16S, LDHA), mesocosm condition (isolated, connected), and sampling point (Hours).
- Filtration blank table. dPCR concentration (copies/µL) quantified in the filtration blanks.
- No template controls table. dPCR concentration (copies/µL) quantified in the no template controls.
- Negative control table. dPCR concentration (copies/µL) quantified in the negative controls.
- Duplex validation table. dPCR concentration (copies/µL) for each singleplex and duplex combination, and their average concentration and standard deviation (SD).
- LOQ table. dPCR concentration (copies/µL) of each duplex combination, their average concentration over dPCR technical replicates (“Average read”), standard deviation, and coefficient of variation. “Expected reads” indicated the concentration calculated from the initial standard concentration and the dilution factor. “dPCR reads” indicated concentration quantified by the instrument (copies/µL).
2. Date that file was created: 2025-01
METHODOLOGICAL INFORMATION
All methods used to generate data are outlined in the resulting publication.
Files and variables
File: datasets.xlsx
Data summary table. Average concentration (copies/mL) and standard deviation (SD) calculated across sample replicates for each mesocosm replicate (a, b, c), eNA molecule (eRNA, eDNA), marker (COI, 18S, 16S, LDHA), mesocosm condition (isolated, connected), and sampling time point (Hours).
Negative control table. dPCR concentration (copies/µL) quantified in the negative controls.
No template controls table. dPCR concentration (copies/µL) quantified in the no template controls.
Filtration blank table. dPCR concentration (copies/µL) quantified in the filtration blanks.
Duplex validation table. dPCR concentration (copies/µL) for each singleplex and duplex combination, and their average concentration and standard deviation (SD) calculated across singleplex and duplex.
Limit of Quantification Table. dPCR concentration (copies/µL) of each duplex combination, their average concentration over dPCR technical replicates (“Average read”), standard deviation, and coefficient of variation. “Expected reads” indicates the concentration calculated from the initial standard concentration and the dilution factor. “dPCR reads” indicates the concentration quantified by the instrument (copies/µL).