Moving towards a better understanding of iterative evolution: an example from the late Silurian Monograptidae (Graptolithina) of the Baltic Basin
Data files
Feb 12, 2020 version files 158.65 KB
-
Supporting_Material_1.doc
44.03 KB
-
Supporting_Material_1.txt
5.66 KB
-
Supporting_Material_2.csv
9.32 KB
-
Supporting_Material_2.xlsx
22.39 KB
-
Supporting_Material_3.csv
32.10 KB
-
Supporting_Material_3.xlsx
45.15 KB
Abstract
Iterative evolution has proved a difficult evolutionary phenomenon to study and interpret. Inferences of causality vary from study to study and quantitatively based phylogenetic reconstruction has never been attempted. In an effort to better understand iterative evolution we employed stratocladistics, gap analysis and disparity analysis to study the case of the Monograptidae in the aftermath of the late Silurian Cyrtograptus lundgreni extinction event. Our combination of gap analytical and stratocladistic techniques allowed us to elucidate the evolutionary relationships between the studied taxa. Based on our stratocladistic results we recommend the generic reassignment of five monograptid taxa. The stratocladistic results, in conjunction with morphological disparity analysis suggest the presence of a persistent developmental potential for the emergence of iteratively evolving characters. This persistent potential appears to be limited by extrinsic ecological constraints, which would have relaxed in the aftermath of the C. lundgreni extinction event. Our findings indicate that iterative evolution in the late Silurian Monograptidae is a product of the interaction of both intrinsic and extrinsic constraints on the acquisition of the iteratively evolving character, with the exact causality being dependent on the particular character.
- Supporting material 1: The function called ancestor.descendant.gaps which estimates joint gap between ancestor and descendant when we have pessimistic stratigraphical scenario when ancestor is immediately succeeded by the descendant (either by gradualism or punctuation)
- Supporting material 2: Productive graptolite samples from the Viduklė-61 core
- Supporting material 3: Straticladistics Matrix, Disparity Matrix