Data from: Phylogenetic relationships and morphological evolution in the carnivorous genus Philcoxia (Plantaginaceae, Gratioleae)
Data files
May 30, 2019 version files 794.67 KB
-
ITS1_46tx_467ch_BI_tree.tre
20.59 KB
-
ITS1_46tx_467ch_BS_output.tre
2.89 KB
-
ITS1_46tx_467ch_matrix
22.73 KB
-
ITS1_46tx_467ch_MP_consensus.tre
1.84 KB
-
morpho_50tx_10ch_22_03_2018.nex
17.05 KB
-
names_dryad.xls
23.04 KB
-
PC_50tx_3357ch_BI_tree.tre
25.20 KB
-
PC_50tx_3357ch_BS_output.tre
3.17 KB
-
PC_50tx_3357ch_matrix
169.16 KB
-
PC_50tx_3357ch_MP_consensus.tre
1.90 KB
-
rpl16_48tx_1090ch_BI_tree.tre
22.40 KB
-
rpl16_48tx_1090ch_BS_output.tre
3.04 KB
-
rpl16_48tx_1090ch_matrix
53.60 KB
-
rpl16_48tx_1090ch_MP_consensus.tre
1.87 KB
-
rps16_50tx_1073ch_BI_tree.tre
23.45 KB
-
rps16_50tx_1073ch_BS_output.tre
3.07 KB
-
rps16_50tx_1073ch_matrix
54.96 KB
-
rps16_50tx_1073ch_MP_consensus.tre
1.88 KB
-
TC_50tx_3824ch_BI_tree.tree
33.30 KB
-
TC_50tx_3824ch_BS_output.tre
3.18 KB
-
TC_50tx_3824ch_matrix
192.76 KB
-
TC_50tx_3824ch_MP_consensus.tre
1.90 KB
-
trnL_49tx_646ch_BI_tree.tre
21.42 KB
-
trnL_49tx_646ch_BS_output.tre
2.99 KB
-
trnL_49tx_646ch_matrix
32.95 KB
-
trnL_49tx_646ch_MP_consensus.tre
1.86 KB
-
trnLF_47tx_548ch_BI_tree.tre
20.63 KB
-
trnLF_47tx_548ch_BS_output.tre
2.94 KB
-
trnLF_47tx_548ch_matrix
27.02 KB
-
trnLF_47tx_548ch_MP_consensus.tre
1.84 KB
Abstract
Philcoxia (Plantaginaceae, Gratioleae) is a genus with seven species of small herbs endemic to Brazil. It is characterized by underground stems and petioles, peltate leaves, and zigzag racemose inflorescences, in addition to a remarkable carnivorous syndrome. The phylogenetic placement of Philcoxia within tribe Gratioleae has been uncertain since its discovery due to its unique morphology and limited data from phylogenetic studies. We tested the phylogenetic placement of Philcoxia within Gratioleae, increasing the number of species sampled within both the genus and the rest of the tribe, and sequencing four regions from cpDNA (rpl16, rps16, and trnL introns and the trnL-trnF intergenic spacer) and one from nrDNA (ITS1 spacer); we used both parsimony and Bayesian inference to reconstruct the phylogeny. Moreover, we assessed both the monophyly of the genus and interspecific relationships. Finally, we performed ancestral character state reconstructions of 10 morphological characters to infer synapomorphies for the genus and specific clades within it. Philcoxia was recovered as monophyletic, with maximum support values, as sister to Stemodia stellata. Five morphological character states were reconstructed as potential synapomorphies for the Philcoxia clade (rosetted herb habit, underground stems and petioles, floral resupination, number of stamens reduced to two, and number of fertile thecae per anther reduced to one), whereas fourwere reconstructed as potential synapomorphies for specific clades within the genus (peltate leaves, irregular rosettes, vegetative propagation by rhizomes, and presence of tubers). Further anatomical studies, in association with ecological data, would provide insight into the structure of the underground systems and its adaptive significance, and would further elucidate the evolution of carnivory in Philcoxia. Our study highlights the need to reassess the concepts and circumscriptions of some currently accepted genera of the Gratioleae such as Bacopa, Conobea, and Stemodia, and for the tribe Angelonieae.