Supplementary material from: Burden of Shigella among children with diarrhea in the Americas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Data files
Mar 26, 2025 version files 9.74 KB
-
README.md
2.40 KB
-
ShigellaLatinAmerica_IncludedStudies.csv
7.34 KB
Abstract
Introduction: Shigella infection is a leading cause of diarrhea worldwide. While the burden of Shigella has been shown to be highest in Africa and Asia, recent studies have also shown considerable burden in the Americas. With several pediatric Shigella vaccines in clinical development, policymakers in the region will eventually consider whether a Shigella vaccine is appropriate for their setting.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analyses to summarize the burden (characterized by prevalence, incidence, and attributable fraction estimates) of Shigella diarrhea among children under 72 months in the Americas, excluding the U.S., Canada, and Greenland. We searched published and pre-print articles available in six databases from January 1, 2000 through July 23, 2024. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted for subgroups of interest when relevant data from at least two studies were present.
Results: This review included 34 studies conducted across 14 countries in the region. Prevalence was most frequently reported, followed by incidence, then attributable fraction. Across all prevalence studies that used a culture detection method (n=23), the pooled prevalence of Shigella among diarrhea cases was 3.1% (95% CI: 1.6- 5.8). The pooled prevalence among 12 studies that used PCR/qPCR detection methods was 16.5% (95% CI: 11.1-24.0). Among culture-based results, the pooled prevalence estimate for children <12 months was 1.0% (95% CI: 0.1 – 7.7) compared to 4.6% (95% CI: 1.2 – 15.4) for children ≥12 months.
Conclusion: Despite varying reporting practices, we found Shigella to be an important contributor to diarrhea in many settings in the Americas with substantial heterogeneity. Limited geographic representation and variable reporting of age group specific estimates were the major gaps in data. Investment in Shigella surveillance in the Americas using a standardized methodology can contribute to accelerating Shigella vaccine development in consideration of regional preferences and optimal age of introduction.
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.nvx0k6f38
Description of the data and file structure
This file contains supplementary material for a systematic review titled Burden of Shigella among Children with Diarrhea in the Americas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analyses to summarize the burden (characterized by prevalence, incidence, and attributable fraction estimates) of Shigella diarrhea among children under 72 months in the Americas, excluding the U.S., Canada, and Greenland. We searched published and pre-print articles available in six databases from January 1, 2000 through July 23, 2024. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted for subgroups of interest when relevant data from at least two studies were present.
Files and variables
The figures file contains all tables and figures mentioned in the manuscript.
The appendices file contains the following information:
- Appendix 1: PRISMA 2020 Checklist for Systematic Reviews
- Appendix 2: Database Search Strings
- Appendix 3: Adapted Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Quality Assessment Tool
- Appendix 4: Quality Assessment of Included Studies
- Appendix 5: Additional forest plots of Shigella burden
- Appendix 6: Burden Estimates from Study Sites in the Amazon Region
- Appendix 7: Reference List of Studies Included in this Review
The included studies data file contains the following information regarding all studies included in the review:
- DOI/Link - The digital location where the included study was accessed
- Publication Language - The language of the original publication
- Title (English) - The title of the study (translated to English, when relevant)
- Lead author last name - The last name of only the first author
- Year of publication - Year in which the study was published
- Data collection start - The date (month then year) when the study commenced data collection
- Data collection end - The date (month then year) when the study finished data collection
- Study site (country) - The country/countries where the study took place, if >2 listed as “multiple countries”
Access information
Data was derived from the following sources: See Appendix 7 for reference list