FATES projections of forest structure and composition (1830-2098) at a mixed conifer site in the southern Sierra Nevada
Data files
Jul 18, 2025 version files 47.93 MB
-
column_descriptions_for_fates_output.csv
8.17 KB
-
met_driver_wrf_1950_2020.tar.gz
17.52 MB
-
met_driver_wrf_ssp370.tar.gz
21.16 MB
-
processed_fates_output_timeseries_1830-2098.tar.gz
9.16 MB
-
README.md
5.91 KB
-
validated_parameterizations_070224.zip
79.55 KB
Abstract
This data repository contains model source code, parameter sets, driver data, and model output for simulations run with the Functionally Assembled Terrestrial Ecosystem Simulator (FATES) in a mixed conifer forest ~35 miles northeast of Fresno (37.0717, 119.2265) in California’s southern Sierra Nevada. The code and data provided here were used to 1) hindcast historical fire regimes, forest structure and function, including responses to logging and fire suppression and 2), project future changes in fire regimes and vegetation structure, including conifer and oak basal area and shrub cover, under future climate (2015-2098) and forest management scenarios. Model output for five validated parameterizations are provided. The code and data were designed to answer the following research questions: 1) how will projected future climate (2015-2098) affect forest structure, composition, and persistence of a representative mixed conifer forest in the Sierra Nevada; 2) how does management in the form of fuel reduction treatments and thinning influence these outcomes? The manuscript associated with this research is titled: "Will thinning and fuel reduction treatments save dry conifer forests from climate change?"
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.pnvx0k6z1
Description of the data and file structure
The code and data provided here were used to hindcast historical fire regimes, forest structure and function in a mixed conifer forest in California's Sierra Nevada mountains. This included hindcasting responses to logging and fire suppression. These data were also used to project future changes in fire regimes and vegetation structure, including conifer and oak basal area and shrub cover, under future climate (2015-2098) and forest management scenarios.
Files
File: met_driver_wrf_1950_2020.tar.gz
This file contains the hourly meteorological forcing data used for both the pre-industrial and 20th-century (1870–2015) FATES simulations. Key features include:
- Dynamically downscaled WRF meteorology (Rahimi et al., 2022) based on ERA5 reanalysis (Hersbach et al., 2020).
- Covers the time period 1950 to 2020, with 1951–1980 used as a repeating proxy for pre-industrial climate due to its matching mean pre-industrial temperature in the southern Sierra Nevada.
- Coordinates: 37.0717, -119.2265 (approx. 1730 m elevation), representative of yellow pine and mixed conifer (YPMC) forests.
- Used in both pre-1870 initialization runs (with pre-industrial CO₂ at 280 ppm) and the historical transient simulations through 2015.
File: met_driver_wrf_ssp370.tar.gz
This file contains the future meteorological forcing data for FATES simulations under the SSP3-7.0 emissions scenario:
- Source: FGOALS-g3 climate model projections (Li et al., 2020), dynamically downscaled via Rahimi et al. (2022).
- Time span: 2015 to 2098.
- Used to drive simulations under three forest management scenarios:
- No treatment,
- Single treatment in 2015,
- Continuous treatments every 14 years.
- All scenarios assume continued wildfire suppression, with fire spread modeled only above a 1700 kW m⁻¹ threshold (Andrews et al., 2011).
File: validated_parameterizations_070224.zip
This archive contains five validated parameter files (M1–M5) used to configure FATES simulations.
- Parameter sets were pre-validated and are used to explore structural and functional variation in simulated forest dynamics.
- All simulation ensembles (historical and future) use these parameterizations to capture a range of ecosystem responses.
File: column_descriptions_for_fates_output.csv
This CSV file provides descriptive metadata for the variables included in the processed FATES output timeseries:
- Corresponds to the data in
processed_fates_output_timeseries_1830-2098.tar.gz
. - Each column includes variable name, units, and brief description to facilitate interpretation and downstream analysis.
File: processed_fates_output_timeseries_1830-2098.tar.gz
This archive contains time series output data from FATES simulations spanning 1830 to 2098, representing the full temporal evolution of YPMC forest dynamics under historical and future climate and management scenarios.
Time Span
- 1830–1869: Spin-up phase using recycled 1951–1980 meteorology to simulate pre-industrial climate conditions with CO₂ fixed at 280 ppm.
- 1870–2015: Historical simulations incorporating:
- Forest logging in 1870 following early Euro-American operations (Knapp et al., 2013; Stephens, 2000).
- Transient 20th century meteorology and CO₂ concentrations (Hersbach et al., 2020; Meinshausen et al., 2017).
- Wildfire suppression mechanisms calibrated to match observed burn rates in the early 21st century (Williams et al., 2023).
- 2015–2098: Future projections under SSP3-7.0 using downscaled FGOALS-g3 climate data (Rahimi et al., 2022).
Simulation Scenarios
Each simulation uses one of five validated parameterizations (M1–M5) from validated_parameterizations_070224.zip
.
Three distinct forest management treatments are included:
- No Treatment
- Single Treatment (2015): Forest thinned once using North et al. (2007, 2022) protocols.
- Continuous Treatment: Repeated thinning every 14 years through 2098.
Data Structure
- The archive contains time series outputs organized by scenario and parameterization.
- Key ecosystem variables include biomass pools, fluxes, stand structure, fire occurrence, and carbon cycling metrics.
- Variable definitions and units are documented in
column_descriptions_for_fates_output.csv
.
Usage Notes
- The output data is suitable for long-term analysis of forest structure, fire dynamics, climate sensitivity, and management outcomes.
- It supports comparative studies across treatments and parameter sets to evaluate forest resilience, carbon sequestration, and disturbance response.
Software: fates-ca_ahb.zip
Description: FATES source code used for all simulations. For technical information about the FATES model please see the FATES wiki. This version of the FATES source code has three important modifications compared to the FATES main branch:
- Inter-patch dispersal to capture conifer dispersal limitation into large burned areas
- Plant functional type-specific resprouting to capture observed post-fire resprouting in YPMC oaks and shrubs
- Fire-sensitive germination rates to capture observed behavior in Ceanothus spp. and Manzanita spp.
Code/software for viewing files
Any open source software capable of reading netCDF files can be used to view the data in the parameter files and meteorological driver data.
Any open source software capable of reading text and csv files can be used to view the model source code and model output.
FATES was run with 5 different validated parameter files (M1-M5) available in “validated_parameterizations_070224.zip”. All simulations were forced with hourly meteorology from the midpoint of the elevation range of yellow pine and mixed conifer (YPMC) forests in the southern Sierra Nevada (1730 m; Safford & Stevens, 2017) at a point approximately 35 miles northeast of Fresno (37.0717, -119.2265). Pre-1870 simulations were initialized from bare ground and forced with pre-industrial CO2 (280 ppm) and dynamically downscaled (Rahimi et al., 2022) ERA5 reanalysis meteorology (Hersbach et al., 2020) for 700 simulation years. Pre-industrial meteorology was represented by recycling 1951-1980 meteorology because this time period had the same mean temperature in the southern Sierra Nevada as the pre-industrial period. The meteorological driver data are available in “met_driver_wrf_1950_2020.tar.gz”.
To recreate present-day forest conditions we used our pre-industrial simulations to represent the year 1870 and then logged the forest in accordance with early logging operations (Knapp et al., 2013; Stephens, 2000) by removing 95% of all large (> 75 cm dbh) conifers and varying fractions of medium-sized (45-75 cm dbh) pines, cedars, and firs (73%, 13%, and 33% respectively). We then forced the model with 20th century transient climate and CO2 (1870-2015; (Hersbach et al., 2020; Meinshausen et al., 2017; Rahimi et al., 2022). Transient climate (1951 to 2015) is in the “met_driver_wrf_1950_2020.tar.gz” file. We represented fire suppression during this period by only allowing fires to spread if fire intensity exceeded the threshold required to escape suppression efforts (1700 kW m-1) where a “hand line cannot be relied on to hold a fire” (Andrews et al., 2011). We calibrated the ignition rate so that annual burned area in the early 21st century aligned with observations (Williams et al., 2023).
To simulate future climate we forced FATES with dynamically downscaled (Rahimi et al., 2022) FGOALS-g3 climate model projections (Li et al., 2020) under the SSP3-7.0 emissions scenario (2015-2098). Future meteorological data are provided in “met_driver_wrf_ssp370.tar.gz”. We used three forest treatment scenarios: 1) “no treatment” 2) a “single treatment” in 2015 and 3) “continuous treatment” where the forest was treated every 14 years. Based on recommended intensive thinning protocols (North et al., 2007, 2022), our treatments removed small trees (< 50 cm dbh) until relative stand density index (rSDI) was below 25%. If rSDI was still above 25% after removing small trees we thinned larger trees (50-75 cm dbh). Trees larger than 75 cm dbh were not removed and pines larger than 50 cm were not removed. Based on prior analyses of the effects of prescribed fire on fuel loads (Knapp et al., 2017; Stephens and Moghaddas, 2005; Vaillant et al., 2009) we removed 64% of surface fuels in each treatment. All future scenarios assumed that wildfire suppression would continue in the future. All model output is available as a timeseries (1870-2098) in “processed_fates_output_timeseries_1830-2098.tar.gz”
References
Andrews, P., Heinsch, F., Schelvan, L., 2011. How to generate and interpret fire characteristics charts for surface and crown fire behavior. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Fort Collins, CO.
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D., Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R.J., Hólm, E., Janisková, M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., de Rosnay, P., Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., Thépaut, J.-N., 2020. The ERA5 global reanalysis. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 146, 1999–2049. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803
Knapp, E.E., Lydersen, J.M., North, M.P., Collins, B.M., 2017. Efficacy of variable density thinning and prescribed fire for restoring forest heterogeneity to mixed-conifer forest in the central Sierra Nevada, CA. Forest Ecology and Management 406, 228–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.08.028
Knapp, E.E., Skinner, C.N., North, M.P., Estes, B.L., 2013. Long-term overstory and understory change following logging and fire exclusion in a Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forest. Forest Ecology and Management 310, 903–914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.09.041
Li, L., Yu, Y., Tang, Y., Lin, P., Xie, J., Song, M., Dong, L., Zhou, T., Liu, L., Wang, Lu, Pu, Y., Chen, X., Chen, L., Xie, Z., Liu, Hongbo, Zhang, L., Huang, X., Feng, T., Zheng, W., Xia, K., Liu, Hailong, Liu, J., Wang, Y., Wang, Longhuan, Jia, B., Xie, F., Wang, B., Zhao, S., Yu, Z., Zhao, B., Wei, J., 2020. The Flexible Global Ocean-Atmosphere-Land System Model Grid-Point Version 3 (FGOALS-g3): Description and Evaluation. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems 12, e2019MS002012. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS002012
Meinshausen, M., Vogel, E., Nauels, A., Lorbacher, K., Meinshausen, N., Etheridge, D.M., Fraser, P.J., Montzka, S.A., Rayner, P.J., Trudinger, C.M., Krummel, P.B., Beyerle, U., Canadell, J.G., Daniel, J.S., Enting, I.G., Law, R.M., Lunder, C.R., O’Doherty, S., Prinn, R.G., Reimann, S., Rubino, M., Velders, G.J.M., Vollmer, M.K., Wang, R.H.J., Weiss, R., 2017. Historical greenhouse gas concentrations for climate modelling (CMIP6). Geoscientific Model Development 10, 2057–2116. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2057-2017
North, M., Innes, J., Zald, H., 2007. Comparison of thinning and prescribed fire restoration treatments to Sierran mixed-conifer historic conditions. Can. J. For. Res. 37, 331–342. https://doi.org/10.1139/X06-236
North, M.P., Tompkins, R.E., Bernal, A.A., Collins, B.M., Stephens, S.L., York, R.A., 2022. Operational resilience in western US frequent-fire forests. Forest Ecology and Management 507, 120004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2021.120004
Rahimi, S., Krantz, W., Lin, Y.-H., Bass, B., Goldenson, N., Hall, A., Lebo, Z.J., Norris, J., 2022. Evaluation of a Reanalysis-Driven Configuration of WRF4 Over the Western United States From 1980 to 2020. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 127, e2021JD035699. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035699
Stephens, S.L., 2000. MIXED CONIFER AND RED FIR FOREST STRUCTURE AND USES IN 1899 FROM THE CENTRAL AND NORTHERN SIERRA NEVADA, CALIFORNIA. Madroño 47, 43–52.
Stephens, S.L., Moghaddas, J.J., 2005. Experimental fuel treatment impacts on forest structure, potential fire behavior, and predicted tree mortality in a California mixed conifer forest. Forest Ecology and Management 215, 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.03.070
Vaillant, N.M., Fites-Kaufman, J.A., Stephens, S.L., 2009. Effectiveness of prescribed fire as a fuel treatment in Californian coniferous forests. Int. J. Wildland Fire 18, 165–175.
Williams, J.N., Safford, H.D., Enstice, N., Steel, Z.L., Paulson, A.K., 2023. High-severity burned area and proportion exceed historic conditions in Sierra Nevada, California, and adjacent ranges. Ecosphere 14, e4397. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4397